In Favor of Some Uncommon Approaches to the Study of Speech
It is no secret that phonetics and phonology are two very different cultures, despite the close logical connection between their nominal aims. In education, in terminology, in research methods, in styles of argument, and in scientific journal and professional society allegiance, the divergence is striking.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Liberman, M. The intonation system of English. Ph.D. dissertation, M.I.T. New York: Garland Press, 1979.Google Scholar
- Liberman, M., & Pierrehumbert, J. Intonational invariance under changes in pitch range and length.(to appear).Google Scholar
- Liberman, M., & Prince, A. On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry, 1977, 8, 249–336.Google Scholar
- Liberman, M., & Sag, I. Prosodic form and discourse function. CLS, 1974, 10, 416–426.Google Scholar
- Pierrehumbert, J. The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Ph.D. dissertation, M.I.T., 1979 (forthcoming from MIT Press).Google Scholar
- Pierrehumbert, J., & Liberman, M. Modeling the fundamental frequency of the voice. Contemporary Psychology, 1982, 27(9), 690–692.Google Scholar
- Sag, I., & Liberman, M. The intonational disambiguation of indirect speech acts. CLS, 1975, 11, 487–498.Google Scholar