Abstract
The mechanism whereby the central nervous system (CNS) controls, simultaneously, the large number of degrees of freedom of the multijoint musculoskeletal system has long been one of the major questions in motor physiology. This incredibly complex task must be dependent upon “rules” which permit original and creative motor solutions to problems such as reaching for objects in a structured space. As a step toward understanding these rules, a number of investigators have studied relatively simple motions involving a limited number of joints (Asatryan & Feldman, 1965; Bizzi, Polit, & Morasso, 1976; Cooke, 1979; Kelso & Holt, 1980). The results have indicated some of the processes that subserve these movements and have given us a picture of the elementary building blocks from which more complex movements may be constructed. Several points have emerged from these investigations. First, it has become apparent that the forces that control the muscles result from “commands” that are, to a great extent, precomputed in some part of the CNS. These observations are based on studies made in deafferented animals that have demonstrated open-loop reaching (Bizzi et al., 1976; Polit & Bizzi, 1979; Taub, Goldberg, & Taub, 1975). Second, recent investigations have convincingly demonstrated that muscles, to a first approximation, can be thought of as behaving like tunable springs (Rack & Westbury, 1974).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allum, J. H. J. Responses to load disturbances in human shoulder muscles: The hypothesis that one component is a pulse test information signal. Experimental Brain Research, 1975, 22, 307–326.
Asatryan, D. G., & Feldman, A. G. Biophysics of complex systems and mathematical models. Functional tuning of nervous system with control of movement or maintenance of a steady posture. I. Mechanographic analysis of the work of the joint on execution of a postural task. Biophysics, 1965, 10, 925–935.
Bizzi, E. The coordination of eye-head movement. Scientific American, 1914, 231, 100–106.
Bizzi, E., Accornero, N., Chappie, W., & Hogan, N. Arm trajectory formation in monkeys. Experimental Brain Research, 1982, 46, 139–143.
Bizzi, E., Dev, P., Morasso, P., & Polit, A. The effect of load disturbances during centrally initiated movements. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1978, 41, 542–556.
Bizzi, E., Kalil, R. E., & Tagliasco, V. Eye-head coordination in monkeys: Evidence for centrally patterned organization. Science, 1971, 173, 452–454.
Bizzi, E., Polit, A., & Morasso, P. Mechanisms underlying achievement of final head position. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1976, 39, 435–444.
Conrad, B., Matsunami, C., Meyer-Lohmann, J., Wiesendanger, M., & Brooks, V. B. Cortical load compensation during voluntary elbow movements. Brain Research, 1974, 81, 507–514.
Cooke, J. D. Dependence of human arm movements on limb mechanical properties. Brain Research, 1979, 165, 366–369.
Feldman, A. G. Functional tuning of the nervous system during control of movement or maintenance of a steady posture. III. Mechanographic analysis of the execution by man of the simplest motor tasks. Biophysics, 1966, 11, 766–775.
Kelso, J. A. S., & Holt, K. G. Exploring a vibratory system’s analysis of human movement production. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1980, 43, 1183–1196.
Marsden, C. D., Merton, P. A., & Morton, H. B. Servo action in the human thumb. Journal of Physiology, London, 1976, 257, 1–44. (a)
Marsden, C.D., Merton, P. A., & Morton, H. B. Stretch reflexes and servo actions in a variety of human muscles. Journal of Physiology, London, 1976, 257, 531–560.(b)
Nichols, T. R. & Houk, J. C. Reflex compensation for variations in the mechanical properties of a muscle. Science, 1973, 181, 182–184.
Nichols, T. R., & Houk, J. C. The improvement in linearity and the regulation of stiffness that results from the actions of the stretch reflex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1976, 39, 119–142.
Partridge, L. D. Muscle properties: A problem for the motor controller physiologist. In R. E. Talbott & D. R. Humphrey (Eds.), Posture and movement. New York: Raven Press, 1979.
Polit, A., & Bizzi, E. Characteristics of motor programs underlying arm movements in monkeys. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1979, 42, 183–194.
Rack, P. M. H., & Westbury, D. R. The short range stiffness of active mammalian muscle and its effect on mechanical properties. Journal of Physiology, London, 1974, 240, 331–350.
Taub, E., Goldberg, I. A., & Taub, P. Deafferentation in monkeys: Pointing at a target without visual feedback. Experimental Neurology, 1975, 46, 178–186.
Vallbo, Å. B. The significance of intramuscular receptors in load compensation during voluntary contractions in man. In R. B. Stein, K. G. Pearson, R. S. Smith, & J. B. Redford, (Eds.), Control of posture and locomotion. New York: Plenum, 1973.
Wilson, D. M. The central nervous control of flight in a locust. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1961, 38, 471–490.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1983 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bizzi, E. (1983). Central Processes Involved in Arm Movement Control. In: MacNeilage, P.F. (eds) The Production of Speech. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8202-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8202-7_1
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-8204-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-8202-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive