Abstract
Medawar’s Induction and Intuition in Scientific Thoughtis an extraordinary book. First of all, it is well printed in black ink with a plain, legible type on good white paper, with running heads and page numbers where they belong, decent margins, paragraphs properly indented, a centered and dignified title page, and a sober yet clearly stamped binding. Such bookmaking is nearly extinct. It deserves a laurel wreath.
A Scientist who writes on philosophy faces conflicts of conscience from which he will seldom extricate himself whole and unscathed; the open horizon and depth of philosophical thoughts are not easily reconciled with that objective clarity and determinacy for which he has been trained in the school of science.
H. Weyl, Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Science
I felt that the philosophers moving in the realm of infinity without the precautions and experiences of the mathematicians were like ships in a dense fog in a sea full of dangerous rocks, yet blissfully unaware of the dangers.
M. Born, My Life
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
J. C. Maxwell, “On the dynamical evidence of the molecular constitution of bodies”, Nature 11 (1875): 352–359, 374–377.
Cf. P. R. Halmos “Mathematics as a creative art”, American Scientist 36 (1968): 375–389.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1984 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Truesdell, C. (1984). Is There a Philosophy of Science? (1973). In: An Idiot’s Fugitive Essays on Science. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8185-3_38
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8185-3_38
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-8187-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-8185-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive