Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in the History of Mathematics and Physical Sciences ((HISTORY,volume 5))

  • 962 Accesses

Abstract

Fermat wrote nine interesting and important papers on the method of maxima and minima which are grouped together in his collected works. The last two in this set were sent by him in 1662 as attachments to a letter to a colleague, Marin Cureau de la Chambre.1 As their titles, “The analysis of refractions” and “The synthesis of refractions,” imply, they are companion derivations of the law of refraction, now usually known as Snell’s law. These papers are fundamental for us because Fermat enunciates in them his principle that “nature operates by means and ways that are ‘easiest and fastest.’” He goes on to state that it is not generally true that “nature always acts along shortest paths” (this was the assumption of de la Chambre). Indeed, he cites the example of Galileo that when particles move under the action of gravity they proceed along paths that take the least time to traverse, and not along ones that are of the least length.2 This enunciation by Fermat is, as far as I am aware, the first one to appear in correct form and to be used properly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fermat, OP Vol. I, pp. 132–179. The last papers appear on pp. 170ff. They were appended to a letter of 1 January 1662.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Newton, APP 2 VI, p. 479. It is of interest to note a paper by Armanini ([1900], pp. 134–135), who formulated the variable end-point problem posed above and discussed aspects of its solution without knowing of Newton’s work.

    Google Scholar 

  3. John Bernoulli, LB and PN pp. 165–169. This appears in German translation by P. Stickel in Ostwald’s Klassiker No. 46, Leipzig, 1894.

    Google Scholar 

  4. It is fortunate that most of the text of both John’s and James’s papers appears in English translation by D. J. Struik, Source,pp. 391–399. (Struik has an omission on p. 395 that makes his footnote 5 meaningless. I give the material correctly below.) In German translation they appear fully in Ostwald, Klassiker No. 46, pp. 1–20. The originals are in John Bernoulli, CR and James Bernoulli, JB. There are two enjoyable and excellent essays on the period by Carathéodory [1937], [1945].

    Google Scholar 

  5. John Bernoulli, RE. His argument on pp. 267–269, however, breaks new ground and in part gave Carathéodory ([1904], pp. 71–79) the insight for his elegant approach to the calculus of variations.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Goldstine, H.H. (1980). Fermat, Newton, Leibniz, and the Bernoullis. In: A History of the Calculus of Variations from the 17th through the 19th Century. Studies in the History of Mathematics and Physical Sciences, vol 5. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8106-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8106-8_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-8108-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-8106-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics