Advertisement

Prospects for the Detection of Higher Order Weak Processes and the Study of Weak Interactions at High Energy

  • David Cline
Part of the Studies in the Natural Sciences book series (SNS, volume 3)

Abstract

The first observation of weak interactions is now over 75 years old.1 An impressive array of understanding of a vast number of phenomena has been achieved for low energy processes, and yet some of the simplest questions that can be asked about the basic nature of the weak interaction can not presently be answered. In many ways we know less about this interaction than we do about the strong interaction. Apparently Heisenberg was the first to recognize the significance of the dimensionality of the coupling constant of the lowest order currentcurrent interaction,2 the lowest order interaction being
$$\textup{H}_{\textup{eff}}=\frac{\textup{G}}{\sqrt{2}}\ \textup{j}_{\lambda}\textup{j}_{\lambda}^{+}$$
, where \(\textup{j}_{\lambda},\ \textup{j}_{\lambda}^{+}\) are appropriate currents and G is the coupling constant. G has the dimensions of (length) 2 or (1/m)2 with a numerical value
$$\textup{G}=\left (1.01 \times 10^{-5} \right)/\left ( \textup{m}_{\textup{P}} \right)^{2}$$
.

Keywords

Weak Interaction Selection Rule Neutral Current High Order Process Weak Inter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    H. Becquerel, Compt. rend. 122, 420 (1896).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W. Heisenberg, Physik 101, 533 (1936).MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    See, for example, L. B. Okun, “Weak Interactions of Elementary Particles”, (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc. 1965), Chapter 18.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Yukawa, Proc. Phys-Math Soc., Japan 17, 48 (1935).MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    See, for example, W. Kummer and G. Segré, Nucl. Phys. 64, 585 (1965) and N. Christ, Phys. Rev. 176, 2086 (1968).MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    I. Ya Pomeranchuk, Soviet Journal of Nuclear Physics 11, 477 (1970).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. Appelquist and J. D. Bjorken, “On Weak Interactions at High Energies”, SLAC preprint.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. D. Dolgov, L. B. Okun and V. I. Zakharov, “Weak Interactions of Colliding Lepton Beams with Energy (102-103) GeV”, preprint from the Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics of the USSR State Committee on Utilization of Atomic Energy, Moscow 1971.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. Feinberg and A. Pais, Phys. Rev. 131, 2724 (1963).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    B. A. Arbuzov, “Weak Interactions” and references herein, Proceedings of the 1970 CERN School of Physics, CERN 71-7.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Gell-Mann, M. Goldberger, N. Kroll and F. E. Low, Phys. Rev. 179, 1518 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    T. D. Lee and C. G. Wick, Nuclear Phys. B9, 209 (1969) B10, 1 (1969) and Phys. Rev. D2, 1033 (1970).MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Letts, 19, 1264 (1967); see also G. T. Hooft, “Predictions for Neutrino-Electron Cross Sections in Weinberg’s Model of Weak Interactions”, University of Utrecht preprint (1971) and B. W. Lee, “Experimental Tests of Weinberg’s Theory of Leptons,“Stony Brook preprint (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Shabalin, Soviet Journal of Nuclear Physics 9, 615 (1969).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    B. L. Ioffe and E. P. Shabalin, Soviet J. of Nucl. Phys. 6, 6031 (1968).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. Mahapatra, J. Rao and R. E. Marshak, Phys. Rev. 171, 1502 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    B. L. Ioffe, Soviet Physics JETP 11, 1158 (1960).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. S. Willey and J. M. Tarter, “Higher Order Terms in the Current-Current Theory of Weak Interactions”, University of Pittsburgh Preprint NYO-3829-47 (1970).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    H. Primakoff, “Weak Interactions”, Proceedings of the 1970 Brandeis Summer School, MIT Press, Cambridge (1970).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    J. D. Bjorken, Phys. Rev. 148, 1467 (1966).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    J. D. Bjorken, Phys. Rev. 179, 1547 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    R. P. Feynman, Phys. Rev. Letts, 23, 1415 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    J. D. Bjorken and E. A. Paschos, Phys. Rev. 185, 1975 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    E. Bloom, et al., Phys. Rev. Letts. 23, 930 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    T. D. Lee, “Scaling Properties in Inelastic Electron Scattering with a Fixed Final Multiplicity”, Columbia University preprint.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    A. Pais and S. Treiman, Phys. Rev. 176, 1974 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    S. K. Singh and L. Wolfenstein, Nucl. Phys. B24, 77 (1970).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    D. Cline, “The Experimental Search for Weak Neutral Currents”, Proceedings of the 1967 Herceg Novi Summer School.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    A. R. Clark, et al., Phys. Rev. Letts. 26, 1667 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    B. V. Geshkenbein and B. L. Ioffe, Soviet J. of Nucl. Phys. 12, 552 (1971).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    S. Glashow, H. J. Schnitzler and S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Letts. 19, 205 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    There are presently at least 15 proposals for experiments at NAL to search for charged intermediate vector bosons.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    See, for example, NAL proposal E1A.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    D. Cline, A. K. Mann and C. Rubbia, Phys. Rev. Letts. 25, 1309 (1970).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    L. Lederman and Pope, Columbia University preprint.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    T. D. Lee, Phys. Rev. Letts. 25, 1144 (1970); see also M. S. Turner and B. C. Barish, California Tech. preprint 68–331.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    R. Gatto, “Theoretical Aspects of Colliding Beam Experiments”, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Electron and photon Interactions at High Energy held at Hamburg, 1965, Vol. I, p. 106.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    D. Cline, A. K. Mann and D. D. Reeder, “Search for Forbidden Angular Configurations in the Reaction \(\textup{e}^{+}\textup{e}^{-}\rightarrow \mu^{+}\mu^{-1}\), proposal submitted to SLAC for SPEAR, SPEAR proposal #7.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    For example in the Wisconsin-CERN NAL experiment E28.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    W. Czyz, G. C. Sheppey and J. D. Walecka, Nuovo Cimento 34, 404 (1964); K. Fujikawa, Thesis at Princeton, 1970 and LøVeth and Radomski, Stanford preprint, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    This is my best guess based on the expected ratio of \(\nu_{\mu}\) to \(\nu_{\textup{e}}\) and the cross section for \(\nu_{\textup{e}}+\textup{N}\rightarrow \textup{e}^{-} +\textup{N}\) which will provide a serious background.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    C. H. Albright, Phys. Rev. D2, 1271 (1970).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    B. Ya Zel’dovich and M. V. Terent’ev, Soviet J. of Nucl. Phys. 7, 650 (1968).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    J. D. Bjorken, private communication.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    D. Ljung, “Experimental Search for Rare K+ Decay Modes”, thesis, University of Wisconsin (1972).Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    J. Bernstein and T. D. Lee, Phys. Rev. 136, B1787 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    This process is currently being searched for down to the level of \(\sim\ 2\ \times\ 10^{-7}\) by the Hawaii-Wisconsin Collaboration. The best limit from this experiment so far is \(7.5\ \times\ 10^{-7}\) at the 90% confidence level, D. Clarke, private communication.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    L. Lederman, “Large Q2 Experiments at Isabelle”, BNL report CRISP 71-29, Isabelle project (1971).Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    E8 — Wisconsin — Michigan Collaboration on a Neutral Hyperon Beam.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    R. H. March, “How to Find (or Unfind) \(\equiv^{\textup{o}} \rightarrow \textup{p}\pi^{-1}\), private communication.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    T. D. Lee and C. N. Yang, Phys. Rev. 126, 2239 (1962).MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    J. H. Klems, R. W. Hildebrand and R. Stiening, Phys. Rev. Letters 24, 1086 (1970).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    A. Pais, Annals of Physics 63, 361 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Cline
    • 1
  1. 1.University of WisconsinMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations