Motoneurone Properties and Motor Control

  • D. Kernell
Part of the Advances in Behavioral Biology book series (ABBI, volume 7)


Firing rate modulation of motor unit contraction is discussed in relation to recent experiments concerning the properties and activation patterns of motor units in the first deep lumbrical muscle of the cat’s foot (Ducati, Kernell and Sjöholm; Kernell and Sjöholm; in preparation). Results from these studies showed that firing rate modulation of motor unit tension was of great importance for gradation of the strength of contractions elicited in the lumbrical muscle by cortical stimulation or by pinching the foot pad. It is pointed out that the extent of firing rate modulation that is produced in a motoneurone by maintained synaptic activity will partly depend on the sensitivity of the firing motoneurone to changes in synaptic current intensity. Studies of neurone models suggest that this sensitivity (i. e. the slope for the relation between impulse frequency and the intensity of activating current) would depend markedly on: (i) the size, time course, and ‘summing ability’ of the permeability changes underlying the after-hyperpolarization of the neurone, and (ii) the difference between the threshold potential for spike initiation and the equilibrium potential for potassium (Kernell, 1968, 1971; Kernell and Sjöholm, 1973).


Firing Rate Motor Unit Spinal Motoneurones Repetitive Firing Motor Unit Firing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adal, M.N. and Barker, D., 1965. Intramuscular branching of fusi-motor fibres. J. Physiol. 177 288–299.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Adrian, E.D. and Bronk, D.W., 1929. The discharge of impulses in motor nerve fibres. Part II. The frequency of discharge in reflex and voluntary contractions. J. Physiol. 67, 119–151.Google Scholar
  3. Appelberg, B. and Emonet-Dénand, F., 1967. Motor units of the first superficial lumbrical muscle of the cat, J. Neurophysiol. 30, 154–160.Google Scholar
  4. Baldissera, F. and Gustafsson, B., 1971. Regulation of repetitive firing in motoneurones by the afterhyperpolarization conductance. Brain Res. 30, 431–434.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baldissera, F., Gustafsson, B. and Parmiggiani, F., 1973. Adaptation in a simple neurone model compared to that of spinal motoneurones. Brain Res. 52, 382–384.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bessou, P., Emonet-Dénand, F. and Laporte, Y., 1963. Relation entre la vitesse de conduction des fibres nerveuses motrices et le temps de contraction de leurs unités motrices. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. (Paris) 256, 5625–5627.Google Scholar
  7. Bigland, B. and Lippold, O.C.J., 1954. Motor unit activity in the voluntary contraction of human muscle. J. Physiol. 125, 322–335.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bracchi, F., Decandia, M. and Gualtierotti, T., 1966. Frequency stabilization in the motor centers of spinal cord and caudal brain stem. Amer. J. Physiol. 210, 1170–1177.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Burke, R.E., 1968. Firing patterns of gastrocnemius motor units in the decerebrate cat. J. Physiol. 196, 631–654.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Calvin, W.H. and Schwindt, P.C., 1972. Steps in production of motoneuron spikes during rhythmic firing. J. Neurophysiol. 35, 297–310.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Coombs, J.S., Eccles, J.C. and Fatt, P., 1955. The electrical properties of the motoneurone membrane. J. Physiol. 130, 291–325.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Denny-Brown, D., 1929. On the nature of postural reflexes. Proc. Roy. Soc. B. 104, 252–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Engberg, I., 1964. Reflexes to foot muscles in the cat. Acta Physiol. Scand. 62, Suppl. 235, 1–64.Google Scholar
  14. Eccles, J.C., 1953. The neurophysiological basis of mind. The Principles of Neurophysiology. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  15. Frankenhaeuser, B. and Huxley, A.F., 1964. The action potential in the myelinated nerve fibre of Xenopus laevis as computed on the basis of voltage clamp data. J. Physiol. 171, 302–315.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Granit, R., 1958. Neuromuscular interaction in postural tone of the cat’s isometric soleus muscle. J. Physiol. 143, 387–402.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Granit, R., Kernell, D. and Shortess, G.K., 1963a. Quantitative aspects of repetitive firing of mammalian motoneurones, caused by injected currents. J. Physiol. 168, 911–931.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Granit, R., Kernell, D. and Shortess, G.K., 1963b. The behavior of mammalian motoneurones during long-lasting orthodromic, antidromic and trans-membrane stimulation. J. Physiol. 169, 743–754.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Grillner, S. and Udo, M., 1971a. Motor unit activity and stiffness of the contracting muscle fibres in the tonic stretch reflex. Acta Physiol. Scand. 81, 422–424.Google Scholar
  20. Grillner, S. and Udo, M., 1971b. Recruitment in the tonic stretch reflex. Acta Physiol. Scand. 81, 571–573.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Henneman, E., Somjen, G. and Carpenter, D.O., 1965. Functional significance of cell size in spinal motoneurons. J. Neurophysiol. 28, 560–580.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ito, M. and Oshima, T., 1962. Temporal summation of afterhyperpolarization following a motoneurone spike. Nature 195, 910–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kernell, D., 1965a. The adaptation and the relation between discharge frequency and current strength of cat lumbosacral motoneurones stimulated by long-lasting injected currents. Acta Physiol. Scand. 65, 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kernell, D., 1965b. High-frequency repetitive firing of cat lumbosacral motoneurones stimulated by long-lasting injected currents. Acta Physiol. Scand. 65, 74–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kernell, D., 1966a. Input resistance, electrical excitability, and size of ventral horn cells in cat spinal cord. Science 152, 1637–1640.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kernell, D., 1966b. The repetitive discharge of motoneurones. In Muscular Afferents and Motor Control. Nobel Symposium I. (Ed. Granit, R.). Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm, pp. 351–362.Google Scholar
  27. Kernell, D., 1968. The repetitive discharge of a simple neurone model compared to that of spinal motoneurones. Brain Res. 11, 685–687.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kernell, D., 1969. Synaptic conductance changes and the repetitive impulse discharge of spinal motoneurones. Brain Res. 15, 291–294.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kernell, D., 1971. Effects of synapses of dendrites and soma on the repetitive impulse firing of a compartmental neurone model. Brain Res. 35, 551–555.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kernell, D., 1972. The early phase of adaptation in repetitive impulse discharges of cat spinal motoneurones. Brain Res. 41, 184–186.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kernell, D. and Sjöholm, H., 1972. Motoneurone models based on ‘voltage clamp equations1 for peripheral nerve. Acta Physiol. Scand. 86, 546–562.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kernell, D. and Sjöholm, H., 1973. Repetitive impulse firing: comparisons between neurone models based on ‘voltage clamp equations’ and spinal motoneurones. Acta Physiol. Scand. 87, 40–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McPhedran, A.M., Wuerker, R.B. and Henneman, E., 1965. Properties of motor units in a homogenous red muscle (soleus) of the cat. J. Neurophysiol. 28, 71–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Milner-Brown, H.S., Stein, R.B. and Yemm, R., 1973. Changes in firing rate of human motor units during linearly changing voluntary contractions. J. Physiol. 230, 371–390.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Rack, P.M.H. and Westbury, D.R., 1969. The effects of length and stimulus rate on tension in the isometric cat soleus muscle. J. Physiol. 204, 443–460.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Kernell
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Nobel Institute for NeurophysiologyKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Department of NeurophysiologyUniversity of AmsterdamHolland

Personalised recommendations