Observation of Lamb-Dip and Transient Nutation at Microwave Frequency

  • Tadao Shimizu


Several nonlinear effects at microwave frequency have been observed in interaction of molecules with a coherent radiation field. From the klystron, a microwave oscillator, a coherent radiation is available, which is as good as the laser radiation in spectral purity, photon flux density, directivity and so on. In the microwave frequency region may be found the counterparts of the various nonlinear phenomena which have been observed in the infrared and visible wavelength regions by laser spectroscopic methods. Those effects might be very usefully employed for an investigation of the fast process of rotational relaxation in molecules. In the first part of the present article an observation of saturation dip in the microwave absorption line is described. In the second part a transient change in the intensity of molecular absorption line caused by a fast switching of microwave field, will be discussed.


Microwave Frequency Decay Time Constant Rotational Quantum Number Inversion Transition Microwave Transition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1).
    T. Shimizu and C. C. Costain, “Observation of Saturation Dip in the Microwave Spectral Line”, to be submitted.Google Scholar
  2. 2).
    C. C. Costain, Can. J. Phys. 47, 2431 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3).
    T. Amano and T. Shimizu, “Observation of Transient Nutation Effect in Microwave Transitions of Ammonia Molecules”, to be published in J. Phys. Soc. Japan.Google Scholar
  4. 4).
    R. G. Brewer and R. L. Shoemaker, Phys. Rev. Letters 27, 631 (1971), Phys. Rev. A6 2001 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5).
    J. M. Levy, J. H.-S. Wang, S. G. Kukolich and J. I. Steinfeld, Phys. Rev. Letters 29, 395 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6).
    R. H. Dicke and R. H. Romer, Rev. Sci. Instr. 26, 915 (1955).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7).
    R. M. Hill, D. E. Kaplan, G. F. Herrmann and S. K. Ichiki. Phys. Rev. Letters 18, 105 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8).
    D. C. Lainé, D. Kakati, G. S. Uppal, G. D. S. Smart, and W. S. Bardo, Phys. Letters 29A. 376 (1969).ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9).
    R. H. Schwendeman and H. M. Pickett, J. Chem. Phys. 57, 3511 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10).
    R. L. Legan, J. A. Roberts, E. A. Rinehart, and C. C. Lin, J. Chem. Phys. 43, 4337 (1965).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11).
    A. Battaglia, M. Cattani, and O. Tarrini, Nuovo Cimento 61B, 193 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tadao Shimizu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsUniversity of TokyoTokyo 113Japan

Personalised recommendations