Ultrahigh Resolution Saturated Absorption Spectroscopy



In this paper we report our progress in the search for super narrow lines, our present state of the art in the line shrinking business and what looks like the way towards still higher resolution based on our current knowledge of the broadening mechanisms.


Frequency Stability Reference Laser Natural Linewidth Total Nuclear Spin Methane Line 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R. B. Armstrong and H. L. Welsh, quoted by C. B. Moore, J. Chem. Phys. 49, 1111 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. J. Gerritsen and M. E. Heller, Appl. Opt. Suppl. #2, 73 (1965). See also K. Sakurai and K. Shimoda, Japan J. Appl. Phys. 5, 744 (1966).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. L. Hall and Ch. Bordé, Phys. Rev. Letters 30, 1101 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    In their June, 1973, Paris meeting, the Comité Consultatif pour la Définition du Mètre recommended a wavelength value for the methane P(7) F component, λ = 3392231.4 x 10-12 m. They also recommended a value for a certain iodine transition at.633 µm and for the speed of light, c = 299,792,458 m/sec. The assigned fractional uncertainties of these quantities is ±4 x 10-9.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. L. Hall, IEEE J. Quant. Electron. QE4, 638 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. L. Barger and J. L. Hall, Phys. Rev. Letters 22, 4 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Spectrum from L. Henry, N. Husson, R. Andia, and A. Valentin, J. Mol. Spectry. 36, 511 (1970).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. A. Magyar and J. L. Hall, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 17, 67 (1972); and J. A. Magyar, to be published.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Moret-Bailly, J. Mol. Spectry 15, 344 (1965).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. T. Hecht, J. Mol. Spectry. 5, 355 and 390 (1960).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. Herzberg, Electronic Spectra of Polyatomic Molecules (Van Nostrand, Princeton, N.J., 1967), p. 102.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. T. Hougen, J. Chem. Phys. 39, 358 (1963).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. T. Hougen, private communication.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. T. Hougen, 28th Symposium on MOlecular Structure and Spectroscopy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, June, 1973; and to be published.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    P. N. Yi, I. Ozier, and N. F. Ramsey, J. Chem. Phys. 55, 5215 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. N. Bagaev and V. P. Chebotayev, ZhETF Pis. Red. 16, 614 (1972) [JETP Lett. 16, 433 (1972)].ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    The recoil splitting quoted in Ref. 3, 2.4 kHz, is unfortunately in error. The proper splitting is 2.44 x 10-11 fractional shift, which is 2.16 kHz.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. P. Kol’chenko, S. G. Rautian, and R. I. Sokolovskii, ZhETF 55, 1864 (1968) [Sov. Phys. — JETP 28, 986 (1969)].Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. L. Smith, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 61, 1015 (1971); also H. Wahlquist, J. Chem. Phys. 35, 1708 (1961).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    J. L. Hall, in Atomic Physics 3 edited by S. J. Smith and G. K. Walters (Plenum, New York, 1973), pp. 615–646.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    J. L. Hall and Ch. Bordé, Proceedings of the 27th Annual Symposium on Frequency Control, Cherry Hill, N. J. (June 1973).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Joint Institute for Laboratory Astrophysics, National Bureau of StandardsUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA
  2. 2.National Bureau of StandardsBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations