Advertisement

Motor Control pp 195-215 | Cite as

Muscle Stiffness and Motor Control - Forces in the Ankle During Locomotion and Standing

  • Sten Grillner

Abstract

In order to have any idea of how CNS controls movements, we must know the general properties of the motor, it is set to control and what is required from this motor under normal as well as extreme conditions. We must know how sluggish the muscles are and what forces they can and must develop at different joint angles. We must further know the time course of the movement we are studying under normal and extreme conditions to be able to evaluate if the time available permits reflex adjustments or correcting signals from higher structures during the course of the movement. This kind of data is relatively simple to obtain, without them any discussion of results related to the neural control of movement can only end up in rather loose speculations.

Keywords

Motor Unit Joint Angle Soleus Muscle Stance Phase Mechanical Axis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AHLMAN H., GRILLNER S. and UDO M. (1971). The effect of 5HTP on the static fusimotor activity and the tonic stretch reflex of an extensor muscle. Brain Res. 27: 393–396.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BERGEL D.H, BROWN M.C., BUTLER R.G. and ZACKS R.M.(1972) The effect of stretching a contracting muscle on its subsequent performance during shortening. J.Physiol. (Lond.). 225: 21–22 P.Google Scholar
  3. BROWN M.C., ENGBERG I. and MATTHEWS P.B.C. (1967) The relative sensitivity to vibration of muscle receptors of the cat. J.Physiol. (Lond.). 192: 773–800.Google Scholar
  4. BROWN M.C., LAWRENCE D.G. and MATTHEWS P.B.C. (1968) Reflex inhibition by la afferent input of spontaneously discharging y-motoneurones in the decerebrate cat. J.Physiol. (Lond.). 198: 5–7 P.Google Scholar
  5. CANGIANO A. and LUTZEMBERGER L. (1972). The action of selectively activated group II muscle afferent fibers on extensor motoneurones. Brain Res. 41: 475–478.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. CAVAGNA G.A., DUSMAN B. and MARGARIA R. (1968). Positive work done by a previously stretched muscle. J.appl.Physiol. 24: 21 -32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. COOK W.A.Jr. and DUNCAN C.C.Jr. (1971).Contribution of group I afferents to the tonic stretch reflex of the decerebrate cat. Brain Res. 33: 509–513.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ELDRED E., GRANIT R. and MERTON P.A. (1953). Supraspinal control of the muscle spindles and its significance. J.Physiol. (Lond.). 122: 498–523.Google Scholar
  9. EMONET-DENAND F.f JAMI L., JOFFROY M. and LAPORTE Y. (1972). Absence de réflex myotatic après blockage de la conduction dans les fibres du group I. C.R.Acad.Sci. (Paris). 274D: 1542–1545.Google Scholar
  10. ENGBERG I. and LUNDBERG A. (1969). An electromyographic analysis of muscular activity in the hindlimb of the cat during unrestrained locomotion. Acta physiol.scand. 75: 614–630.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. GAMBARIAN P.P., ORLOVSKI G.N., PROTOPOPOVA T.Y., SEVERIN F.V. and SHIK M.L. (1971). The activity of muscles during different gaits and adaptive changes of moving organs in family Felidae. Morphology and ecology of vertebrates. Proc.Inst.Zoo 1.Acad.Sci. USSR. 48: 220–239.Google Scholar
  12. GOSLOW G.E.Jr., REINKING R.M. and STUART D.G. (1972). The cat step cycle: hindlimb joint angles and muscle lengths during unrestrained locomotion. J.Morphology (in press).Google Scholar
  13. GRANIT R. (1970). The Basis of Motor Control. Academic Press,London and New York.Google Scholar
  14. GRILLNER S. (1969). The influence of DOPA on the static and the dynamic fusimotor activity to the triceps surae of the spinal cat. Acta physiol.scand. 77: 490–509.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. GRILLNER S. (1970). Is the tonic stretch reflex dependent upon group II excitation? Acta physiol.scand. 78: 431–432.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. GRILLNER S. (1972). The role of muscle stiffness in meeting the changing postural and locomotor requirements for force development by the ankle extensors. Acta physiol.scand. (in press).Google Scholar
  17. GRILLNER S. and UDO M. (1970). Is the tonic stretch reflex dependent on suppression of autogenetic inhibitory reflexes? Acta physiol scand. 79: 13–14 A.Google Scholar
  18. GRILLNER S. and UDO M. (1971). Motor unit activity and stiffness of the contracting muscle fibres in the tonic stretch reflex. Acta.physiol.scand. 81: 422–424.Google Scholar
  19. GRILLNER S. and UDO M. (1971).Recruitment in the tonic stretch reflex. Acta physiol.scand. 81: 571–573.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. HAMMOND P.H. (1960). An experimental study of servoaction in human muscular control. Proc.Third Intern.Conf.Med. Electr. (London). Part 2: 190–199.Google Scholar
  21. LAPORTE Y. and BESSOU P. (1959). Modifications d’excitabilité de motoneurones homonymes provoquées par l’activation physiologique de fibres afférentes d’origine musculaire du group II. J.Physiol. (Paris). 51: 897–908.Google Scholar
  22. MANTER J.T. (1938). The dynamics of quadrupedal walking. J.exp.Biol. 15: 522–540.Google Scholar
  23. MATTHEWS P.B.C. (1959). A study of certain factors influencing the stretch reflex of the decerebrate cat. J.Physiol. (Lond). 147: 547–564.Google Scholar
  24. MATTHEWS P.B.C. (1969). Evidence that the secondary as well as the primary endings of the muscle spindles may be responsible for the tonic stretch reflex of the decerebrate cat. J.Physiol. (Lond.).204: 365–393.Google Scholar
  25. MATTHEWS P.B.C. (1970). A reply to criticism of the hypothesis that the group II afferents contribute excitation to the stretch reflex. Acta physiol.scand. 79: 431–433.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. MATTHEWS P.B.C. (1972). Mammalian muscle receptors and their central actions. London, Edward Arnold (Publishers) Ltd.Google Scholar
  27. McGRATH G.Y. and MATTHEWS P.B.C. (1970). Support for an autogenetic excitatory reflex action of the spindle secondaries from the effect of gamma blocade bv era caine. J.Physiol. (Lond.). 210: 176–177 p.Google Scholar
  28. MELVILLE JONES G. and WATT D.G.D. (1971). Observations on the control of stepping and hopping movements in man. J.Physiol. (Lond.). 21 9: 709–727.Google Scholar
  29. RACK P.M.H. (1966). The behaviour of a mammalian muscle during sinusoidal stretching. J.Physiol. (Lond.). 183: 1–14.Google Scholar
  30. RACK P.M.H. (1970). The significance of mechanical properties of muscle in the reflex control of posture, pp. 317–322. In Excitatory Synaptic Mechanisms. Oslo. Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  31. RACK P.M.H. and WESTBURY D.R. (1969). The effects of length and stimulus rate on tension in the isometric cat soleus muscle. J.Physiol.(Lond.) 204: 443–460.Google Scholar
  32. SEVERIN F.V., SHIK M.L. and ORLOVSKI G.N. (1967). Work of muscles and single motoneurones during controlled locomotion. Biofizika. (eng.translation). 12: 762–772.Google Scholar
  33. SHICK M.L., DILOVSKY G.N., SEVERIN F.V. (1966). Organiza tion of locomotive synergy. Biofizika (in Russian). 11: 879–887.Google Scholar
  34. TAUB E. and BERMAN A.J. (1968). Movement and learning in the absence of sensory feedback, pp.173–192. In: The Neurophysiology of Spatially Oriented Behaviour, Ed. S.J.Freedman.The Dorsey Press, Homewood, Illinois Irwing–Dorsey Ltd., Nobleton, Ontario.Google Scholar
  35. WESTBURY D.R. (1971). A comparison of stretch and vibration reflexes at the motoneurone. J.Physiol (Lond.). 213: 25–26Google Scholar
  36. WETZEL M.C., GERLACH R.L., STERN L.Z. and HANNAPEL L.K. (1972). Behaviour and histochemistry of functionally isolated cat ankle extensors. Experimental Neurology. (in press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sten Grillner
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysiologyUniversity of GöteborgGöteborgSweden

Personalised recommendations