Skip to main content

Electron-Positron Annihilation and the Structure of Hadrons

  • Chapter
Theories and Experiments in High-Energy Physics

Part of the book series: Studies in the Natural Sciences ((SNS))

Abstract

The last two months have been very exciting ones in elementary particle physics. They have been filled with the most rapid and unexpected discoveries that I can recall. The highlight of this period is undoubtedly the finding of very narrow boson resonances, 1–4 the ψ’s at 3.1 and 3.7 GeV.

Work supported by Energy Research and Development Administration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J.-E. Augustin et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 33, 1406 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J.J. Aubert et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 33, 1404 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. C. Bacci et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 33, 1408 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Erratum, Phys. Rev. Letters 33, 1649 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. G.S. Abrams et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 33, 1453 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Gell-Mann, Phys. Letters 8, 214 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. G. Zweig, CERN preprints TH.401 and TH.412, unpublished (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  8. M.Y. Han and Y. Nambu, Phys. Rev. 139, B1006 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D. Benaksas et al., Phys. Letters 39B, 289 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. D. Benaksas et al., ibid., 42B, 507 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Benaksas et al., ibid., 48B, 155 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Benaksas et al., ibid., 48B, 159 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Benaksas et al., ibid., 40B, 685 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. Cosme et al., paper submitted to the Bonn Conference, August 1973 (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. Salvini, talk presented at the Italian Society of Physics, October 28 - November 2, 1974 (unpublished). The total cross sections used are “grand average” values from Frascati experiments.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J.-E. Augustin et al., SLAC-PUB-1520, 1975 (unpublished). A 10% uncertainty in overall normalization is not included in Fig. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See, for example, J.D. Bjorken in Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Electron and Photon Interactions at High Energies, H. Rollnik and W. Pfeil, eds. ( North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1974 ), p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  18. The possibility of a step and/or bump in R at charm threshold and asymptotic approach to 10/3 was stressed before the recent experimental data by K. Wilson, ref. 14, J. Kogut, ref. 15, and T. Appelquist and H.D. Politzer, ref. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  19. K. Wilson, remarks at the London Conference, July 1974 (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Kogut, invited talk at the American Physical Society meeting, William and Mary College, September 5–7, 1974, and Cornell preprint CLNS-285, 1974 (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  21. T. Appelquist and H.D. Politzer, Phys. Rev. Letters 34, 43 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. B. Richter, in Proceedings of the XVII International Conference on High Energy Physics, J.R. Smith, ed. ( Science Research Council, Chilton, Didcot, 1974 ), p. IV - 37.

    Google Scholar 

  23. B.A. Barnett, invited talk at this conference.

    Google Scholar 

  24. G.K. O’Neill, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc., Series II, 20, 95 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  25. See, for example, F.J. Gilman, invited talk at the Irvine Conference, December 1973, and SLAC-PUB1396, 1974 (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  26. H. Lynch, invited talk at this conference.

    Google Scholar 

  27. R.F. Schwitters, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc., Series II, 20, 95 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  28. W. Braunschweig et al., DESY preprints DESY 74/59, 1974 (unpublished) and DESY 74/62, 1974 (unpublished) and DESY 74/62, 1974 (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  29. R. Hofstadter, invited talk at this conference, and R.L. Ford et al., Stanford University preprint HEPL 748, 1975 (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  30. We are assuming that J = 1 and all decay modes are detected in evaluating widths. See the discussion of widths and radiative corrections in J. Bjorken et al., SLAC-PUB-1515, 1974 (unpublished), and also K. Geer et al., Ohio State preprint, COO-1545–147, 1974 (unpublished), and D.R. Yennie, Phys. Rev. Letters 34, 239 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  31. G. Wolf, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc., Series II, 20, 95 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  32. A.M. Boyarski et al., SLAC-PUB-1523, 1975 (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  33. This has been particularly pointed out by H. Harari, SLAC-PUB-1514, 1974 (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  34. D.E. Andrews et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 34, 233 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. E.H. Thorndike, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc., Series II, 20, 95 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  36. J.F. Martin et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 34, 288 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. University of Massachusetts - SLAC experiment as quoted at the Anaheim meeting, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc., Series II, 20, 95 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  38. SLAC - University of Wisconsin experiment as quoted at the Anaheim meeting, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc., Series II, 20, 95 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Columbia University, University of Hawaii, Cornell University, University of Illinois, FNAL experiment as quoted at the Anaheim meeting, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc., Series II, 20, 95 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  40. See, for example, the arguments of I. Bars and R. D. Peccei, Stanford University preprint ITP-480, 1974 (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  41. See, for example, the review of K. Gottfried, Proc. of the 1971 Int. Symposium on Electron and Photon Interactions at High Energies, N.B. Mistry, ed. ( Cornell University, Ithaca, 1972 ), p. 221.

    Google Scholar 

  42. C.E. Carlson and P.G.O. Freund, University of Chicago preprint EFI 74–60, 1974 (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Also relevant to the nature of the tp’s is their production in nucleon-nucleon collisions and other purely hadronic reactions. This has been treated by J.F. Gunion, University of Pittsburgh preprint, 1974 (unpublished)

    Google Scholar 

  44. R. Blankenbecler et al., SLAC-PUB-1531, 1975 (unpublished)

    Google Scholar 

  45. R.M. Barnett and D. Silverman, Harvard University preprint, 1975 (unpublished)

    Google Scholar 

  46. J. Kripfganz and J. Ranft, Leipzig preprint, 1975 (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  47. General reviews of the theoretical possibilities have been given in print by H. Harari, ref. 28; I. Bars et al., SLAC-PUB-1522, 1974 (unpublished); and by the CERN Boson Theory Workshop, CERN preprint TH. 1964, 1974 (unpublished). See also ref. 41. Much of the material in this section covers the same ground as the above and other quoted references. My apologies are offered to the many people who have made the same analysis and arguments, whether in or out of print, who are not referenced here.

    Google Scholar 

  48. O.W. Greenberg, invited talk at this conference.

    Google Scholar 

  49. The case for charm has been particularly argued for by T. Appelquist and H.D. Politzer, ref. 16

    Google Scholar 

  50. A. De Rujula and S.L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. Letters 34, 46 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  51. T. Appelquist et al., Harvard preprint, 1974 (unpublished); and by M.K. Gaillard, B.W. Lee, and J.L. Rosner, FNAL preprint Pub-74/86-THY, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  52. T. Appelquist et al., Harvard preprint, 1974 (unpublished); and by M.K. Gaillard, B.W. Lee, and J.L. Rosner, FNAL preprint Pub-74/86-THY, 1974(unpublished)

    Google Scholar 

  53. S. Borchardt et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 34, 38 (1975) and Rochester preprint UR-505, 1974 (unpublished). Reviews of aspects of the charm option can be found in ref. 39 and in C. G. Callan et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 34, 52 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  54. S. Kitakado et al., DESY preprint, 1971(unpublished)

    Google Scholar 

  55. L. Clavelli and T.C. Yang, Maryland preprint, 1974 (unpublished)

    Google Scholar 

  56. E. Takasugi and S. Oneda, Maryland preprints, 1974(unpublished)

    Google Scholar 

  57. P. Marcolungo, Padova preprint, 1974 (unpublished)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Y. Hara, Tokyo preprint, 1975 (unpublished)

    Google Scholar 

  59. K. Kajantie et al., Helsinki preprint, 1975 (unpublished)

    Google Scholar 

  60. J. Pasupathy, Tata Institute preprint, 1974 (unpublished). See also refs. 43 and 48.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Nothing prevents one from adding more than one new quark: see R.M. Barnett, Harvard preprint, 1974 (unpublished)

    Google Scholar 

  62. M. Suzuki, Berkeley preprint, 1974 (unpublished); and many unpublished schemes.

    Google Scholar 

  63. J.D. Bjorken and S.L. Glashow, Phys. Letters 11, 255 (1964)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. S.L. Glashow, J. Illiopoulos, and L. Maiani, Phys. Rev. D 2, 1285 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. See also S. L. Glashow in Experimental Meson Spectroscopy -1974, D. Garelick, ed., AIP Conference Proceedings No. 21, Subseries on Particles and Fields No. 8 ( American Institute of Physics, New York, 1974 ), p. 387.

    Google Scholar 

  66. See in particular the asymptotically free gauge theory calculations of T. Appelquist and H.D. Politzer, ref. 16, and of A. De Rujula and S.L. Glashow, ref. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Inasmuch as the recent partial wave analysis of the rrp system by F. Wagner, M. Tabak, and D.M. Chew, Berkeley preprint LBL-3395, 1974 (unpublished) shows that the w(1675) definitely has JP = 3 and is therefore the partner of the g(1680), none of the partners of the p’(1600) can be claimed to have been seen. Establishment of the w’ and 4’ is obviously of some interest.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Estimates of charmed particle masses are to be found in refs. 39 and 41. A lower bound of 1.84 GeV is provided by the narrow ψ(3.7) width.

    Google Scholar 

  69. See, for example, the review of the quark model states in F.J. Gilman, Proceedings of the Summer Institute on Particle Physics, M. Zipf, ed., SLAC Report No. SLAC-179, Vol. I, 307 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Such calculations are reported in the first three papers of ref. 41 and by E. Eichten et al., Cornell preprint, 1971 (unpublished); B.J. Harrington et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 34, 168 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  71. H.J. Schnitzer, Harvard preprint, 1971 (unpublished)

    Google Scholar 

  72. T.P. Cheng and P.B. James, Missouri preprint, 1975 (unpublished)

    Google Scholar 

  73. J. Kogut and L. Susskind, Cornell preprint, 1975 (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  74. M. Gell-Mann, D. Sharp, and W. Wagner, Phys. Rev. Letters 8, 261 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. See, for example, F.J. Gilman and M. Kugler, Phys. Rev. Letters 30, 518 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  76. N. Barash-Schmidt et al., “Review of Particle Properties,” Phys. Letters 50B, No. 1 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Such mixing and a model for the violations of Zweig’s rule through the three-gluon channel in asymptotically free gauge theories have been discussed in detail by A. De Rujula and S.L. Glashow,ref. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  78. See also T. Appelquist and H.D. Politzer, ref. 16; and T. Appelquist et al., ref. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  79. These transitions are discussed in detail by T. Appelquist et al., ref. 41

    Google Scholar 

  80. E. Eichten et al., ref. 48

    Google Scholar 

  81. J. Borenstein and R. Shankar, Harvard preprint, 1974 (unpublished)

    Google Scholar 

  82. S. Rudaz, Cornell preprint, 1974 (unpublished). They have also been treated with varying thoroughness in many of the papers in refs. 39 and 41.

    Google Scholar 

  83. We use the notation Tlc for the pseudoscalar state (associated with the x(3.1)) following M.K. Gaillard, B.W. Lee, and J.L. Rosner, ref. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  84. See for example M.K. Gaillard, B.W. Lee, and J.L. Rosner, ref. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  85. G. Altarelli, N. Cabibbo, and L. Maiani, Ecole Normale Superieure preprint, 1974 (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  86. See also R.L. Kingsley et al., Princeton preprint, 1975 (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  87. If one assumes that the piece of the weak nonleptonic Hamiltonian transforming like the regular, 15-dimensional representation of SU(4) dominates, this is no longer true, as noted by J.D. Bjorken and H. Harari (private communication), and by A. Pais and V. Rittenberg, Rockefeller preprint, C00–2232B-69, 1975 (unpublished). Also H. Fritzsch (private communication).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1975 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gilman, F.J. (1975). Electron-Positron Annihilation and the Structure of Hadrons. In: Perlmutter, A., Widmayer, S.M. (eds) Theories and Experiments in High-Energy Physics. Studies in the Natural Sciences. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4464-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4464-3_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4466-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-4464-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics