Abstract
The economic consequences of monopolies have always been evident. For a long time competition policy was regarded as identical with antitrust policy. Not quite so clear was the situation regarding collective monopolies or cartels respectively U.S. policy was right in not distinguishing between the various types of monopoly. Every monopoly was regarded as ‘unreasonable.’ This was not the case in West-European countries. Even the Federal Republic of West Germany, which of all western countries pursues the strictest competition policy, has not applied a general ban on cartels, as exceptions have been admitted.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1976 H. E. Stenfert Kroese B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Heusz, E. (1976). Concerted Action as an Aspect of Oligopolistic Behaviour and Its Treatment in Competition Policy. In: Jacquemin, A.P., de Jong, H.W. (eds) Markets, corporate behaviour and the state. Nijenrode Studies in Economics, vol 1. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4376-9_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4376-9_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4378-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-4376-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive