Relative Initial Populations of Foil-Excited He I States

  • H. H. Bukow
  • H. v. Buttlar
  • G. Heine
  • M. Reinke


Among the different aspects of the beam-foil interaction three questions will be considered here from the experimental point of view:
  1. (1)

    What is the dependence of the excitation on the principal quantum number n, if all states with same n but different l are summed?

  2. (2)

    What is the dependence of the excitation on the azimuthal quantum number l, if n is fixed?

  3. (3)

    What are the probabilities for the formation of corresponding states (i. e. same (n, l)) for systems with different total spin S?



Triplet State Initial Population Principal Quantum Number Quantum Beat Polarization Filter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J. R. Oppenheimer, Phys. Rev. 31, 349 (1928)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. J. D. Jackson, H. Schiff, Phys Rev. 89, 359 (1953)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. D. R. Bates, A. Dalgarno, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) A 66, 972 (1953).ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. J. R. Hiskes, Phys. Rev. 180,146 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. K. H. Berkner, I. Bornstein, R/T7 Pyle, J. W. Stearns, Phys. Rev. A 6, 278 (1972)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 2.
    B. A. Trubnikov, Y. N. Yavlinski, Soviet Physics JETP 25, 1089 (1967)ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 3.
    W. S. Bickel, H. G. Berry, J. Desesquelles, S. Bashkin, J. Quant Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer. 9, 1145 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. L. Barette, E. J. Knystautas, B. Neveu, R. Drouin, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 90, 59 (1970)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 4.
    N. Andersen, W. S. Bickel, R. Boleu, K. Jensen, E. Veje, Phys. Scripta 3, 255 (1971)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 5.
    A.S. Goodman, D. J. Donahue, Phys. Rev. 141, 1 (1966)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. J. A. Jordan, G. S. Bakken, R. E. Yager, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 530 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. W. S. Bickel, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 58, 213 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. P. H. Heckmann, H. H. Bukow, R. TTelert, Z. Physik 264, 109 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. R. Tielert, H. H. Bukow, P. H. Heckmann, R. Woodruff, H. v. Buttlar, Z. Physik 264, 129 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. M. J. Alguard, C. W. Drake, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 110, 311 (1973)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 6.
    J. D. Garcia, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 110, 245 (1973)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 7.
    D. J. Burns, W. H. Hancock, J.. Opt. Soc. Am. 63, 241 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 8.
    P. D. Dumont, A. E. Livingston, Y. Baudinet-Robinet, G. Weber, L. Quaglia, to be publ. in Phys. ScriptaGoogle Scholar
  19. 9.
    D. J. Burns, W. H. Hancock, Phys. Rev. Lett. 27, 370 (1971)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 10.
    D. J. G. Irwin, A. E. Livingston, Comp. Phys. Comm. 7, 95 (1974)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 11.
    W. L. Wiese, M. W. Smith, B. M. Glennon, Atomic Transition Probabilities, Vol. I, NSRDS-NBS 4, Washington 1966Google Scholar
  22. 12.
    N. Andersen, K. Jensen, J. Jepsen, J. Melskens, E. Ve, je, Appl. Opt. 13, 1965 (1974)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 13.
    P. Dobberstein, H. J. Andrä, W. Wittmann, H. H. Bukow, Z. Physik 257, 272 (1972)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 14.
    H. Winter, H. H. Bukow, to be publishedGoogle Scholar
  25. 15.
    see e.g. D. G. Ellis, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 63, 1232 (1973)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. H. Bukow
    • 1
  • H. v. Buttlar
    • 1
  • G. Heine
    • 1
  • M. Reinke
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Experimentalphysik (III)Ruhr-UniversitätBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations