The Role of Filter Feeders in Stabilizing Phytoplankton Communities with Some Considerations for Aquaculture
Looking at the hydrosphere globally, there is little doubt that most primary production is carried out by phytoplankton. It follows logically that most of the animals in the sea are fine particle feeders, either directly on the phytoplankton itself or on detrital particles largely derived from plant sources following death and partial decomposition of the primary producer. The fine particle feeders that concern us in planning marine propagation experiments will be primarily of two types: free-swimming planktonic animals and attached benthic forms. While there is considerable diversity of feeding mechanisms among the groups, they too can be broadly classified into two types: cirral feeding mechanisms and ciliary-mucous systems. To be able to predict something about the effects of fine particle feeding on suspensions of phytoplankton, we should first consider how these systems work.
KeywordsBiomass Clay Graphite fIltering Phytoplankton
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Barraclough, W. E., and D. Robinson. 1972. The fertilization of Great Central Lake. II. Effect on juvenile sockeye salmon. Fish. Bull 70: 37–48.Google Scholar
- Cannon, H. G. 1928. On the feeding mechanism of the copepods Calanus finmarchicus and Diaptomusgracilis. J. Exp. Biol. 6: 131–144.Google Scholar
- Ivlev, V. S. 1945. The biological production of waters. Uspekhi Sovrem. Biol. 19(1): 98–120.Google Scholar
- Jørgensen, C. B. 1966. Biology of suspension feeding. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Knips, F. 1973. Field observations of filter feeding in Mytilus edulis populations in Pet- peswick Inlet, Nova Scotia. Masters dissertation, McGill University, Montreal.Google Scholar
- Monakov, A. V., and Yu. I. Sorokin. 1961. Experimental investigation of Daphnia nutrition using C14.Doklady (Biol. Sciences) 135: 925–926.Google Scholar
- Parsons, T. R., R. J. LeBrasseur, and J. D. Fulton. 1967. Some observation on the dependence of zooplankton grazing on the cell size and concentration of phytoplankton. J. Oceanogr. Soc. Japan 23: 10–17.Google Scholar
- Pavlova, Ye. V. 1959. On grazing by Penilia avirostris Dana. Tr. Sevast. Biol. Sta. 11: 63–71. (Fish. Res. Bd. Can., Trans. No. 967).Google Scholar
- Rasmont, R. 1968. Nutrition and digestion. Pages 43–51 in: M. Florkin and B. T. Scheer, eds. Chemical Zoology, 2. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Reeve, M. R. 1963. The filter-feeding of Artemia. I. In pure cultures of plant cells. J. Exp. Biol. 40: 195–205.Google Scholar
- Vahl, O. 1972a. Efficiency of particle retention in Mytilus edulis L. Ophelia 10:17–25.Google Scholar
- Vahl, O. 1972b. Particle retention and relation between water transport and oxygen uptake in Chlamys opercular is (L.) (Bivalvia). Ophelia 10: 67–74.Google Scholar