Skip to main content

Insect—Host-plant Relationship — Co-evolution or Sequential Evolution?

  • Chapter
The Host-Plant in Relation to Insect Behaviour and Reproduction

Abstract

Co-evolution is the generally accepted theory for the evolution of insect—host-plant relationships, however, it can be shown that its main premisses are inadequate: (1) most phytophagous insects have very low population densities compared to the biomass of their host-plants, therefore, they can hardly be important selection factors for the plant; (2) insect—host-plant interactions are not necessarily antagonistic: mono- and oligophagous insects, if their number is fairly high, may ideally regulate the abundance of their host-plants (mutual advantage); consequently, (3) resistance to insects is not a general necessity in plants and it cannot explain the presence of secondary plant substances; (4) parallel evolutionary lines of plants and insects which should result from co-evolutionary interactions are rare, while many closely related insects feed on botanically very distant plant taxa — a relationship which cannot be related to co-evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • BATES, M. (1958): Food-getting behavior. In: Roe, A. and Simpson, G. G. (eds.):Behavior and evolution. New Haven, 206–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • EHRLICH P. R. and RAVEN P. H. (1964): Butterflies and plants: a study in revolution. Evolution 18, 586–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FRAENKEL, G. S. (1959): The raison d’etre of secondary plant substances. Science 129 1466–1470.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • KENNEDY, J. S. (1953): Host plant selection in Aphididae. Trans. IXth Int. Congr. Ent. 2, 106–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • LUBISCHEW, A. A. (1969): Philosophical aspects of taxonomy. Ann. Rev. Ent. 14, 19–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MÜLLER, F. P. (1975): Hosts and non-hosts in subspecies of Aulacorthum solani (Kaltenbach) and intraspecific hybridizations (Homoptera: Aphididae). Symp. Biol. Hung. 16, 187–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Google Scholar 

  • WHITTAKER, R. H. and FEENY, P. P. (1971): Allelochemics: chemical interactions between species. Science 171, 757–770.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WILSON, F. (1950): Biological control of weeds. New Biology 8, 51–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZENK, M. H. (1968): Biochemie und Physiologie sekundärer Pflanzenstoffe. Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges 80, 573–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZWÖLFER, H. (1973): Possibilities and limitations in biological control of weeds. Bull. OEPP 3 (3), 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1976 Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jermy, T. (1976). Insect—Host-plant Relationship — Co-evolution or Sequential Evolution?. In: Jermy, T. (eds) The Host-Plant in Relation to Insect Behaviour and Reproduction. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4274-8_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4274-8_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4276-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-4274-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics