Advertisement

Parity Violation Effects Induced by Neutral Currents in Atoms

  • C. Bouchiat
  • M. A. Bouchiat
  • L. Pottier

Abstract

The problem of space reflexion symmetry in atomic physics is a long story which began with the Wigner explanation of the Laporte rule. The symmetry was not questioned until the discovery of parity violation in weak interactions, following the brilliant analysis of Lee and Yang (1). In 1958, Zel’dovich (2) gave the first discussion of the possible effects in Atomic Physics of a weak electron-nucleon interaction induced by neutral currents. In particular, he estimated the rotation of the plane of polarization of visible light propagating in optically inactive matter to be of the order of 10−13 radian/meter, and, at that time, his conclusion was that such an effect, obviously, could not be observed. A similar investigation, somewhat more detailed, was performed later by F.C. Michel (3); the predicted effects concerning mainly the Hydrogen atom, were also not very encouraging.

Keywords

Neutral Current Atomic Physic Parity Violation Radial Wave Function Magnetic Dipole Transition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (1).
    T.D. LEE and C.N. YANG, Phys. Rev. 104, 254 (1956)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    Ya. B. ZEL’DOVICH, Zh. Eksperim. i. Theor. Fiz. 36, 964 (1959) (transl. Soviet Phys. JETP, 9, 682 (1959))Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    F.C. MICHEL, Phys. Rev. B 138, 408 (1965)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    G. T HOOFT, Nucl. Phys. B 33, 173 (1971); ibid. B 35, 167 (1971)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    S. WEINBERG, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 1264 (1967)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    A. SALAM, ‘Elementary ParticlePhysics’, ed. by N. Svartholm, p. 367 (1968)Google Scholar
  7. (7).
    F.J. HASERT et al., Phys. Letters, 46B, 138 (1973)ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    A. BENVENUTI et al., Phys. Rev. Letters, 32, 800 (1974)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    S.J. BARISH et al., Phys. Rev. Letters, 32, 448 (1974)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    M.A. BOUCHIAT and C.C. BOUCHIAT, Phys. Letters 48B, 111 (1974); ibid., J. de Phys. 35, 899 (1974); ibid., J. de Phys. 36, 493 (1975)ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. (11).
    G. FEINBERG and M.Y. CHEN, Phys. Rev. D 10, 190 (1974)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    J. BERNABEU et al., Phys. Letters, 50B, 467 (1974)ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    A.N. MOSKALEV, Zh. E.T.F. Pis. Red. 19, 229, 394 (1974) (JETP Lett. 19,141,216 (1974)ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    I.B. KHRIPLOVICH, Zh. Eksperim. i. Theor. Fiz. pis. Red. 20, 689 (1974) (Transl. Sov. Phys. JETP Lett. 20, 315 (1974))Google Scholar
  15. (15).
    F.G.H. SANDARS in Atomic Physics IV, ed. G. Zu Putlitz, E.M. Weber, A. WINNACKER, Plenum Press, New York (1975)Google Scholar
  16. (16).
    R.R. LEWIS and W.L. WILLIAMS, Phys. Letters, 59B, 70 (1975)ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. (17).
    V. BRISSON, Communication at the XIe Rencontre de Moriond, March 1976Google Scholar
  18. (18).
    C. BOUCHIAT, Proceedings of Neutrino 75 Conference, Balaton (June 1975)Google Scholar
  19. (19).
    H.G. KUHN, Atomic Spectra, p. 342–346 (Longman), 1969Google Scholar
  20. (20).
    C. BOUCHIAT, Phys. Letters, 57B, 284 (1975)ADSGoogle Scholar
  21. (21).
    E.A. HINDS et al., Phys. Letters, 62B, 97 (1976)ADSGoogle Scholar
  22. (22).
    G.E. HARRISON et al., Phys. Rev. Letters, 22, 1263 (1969)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. (23).
    M. BRINICOMBE, C.E. LOVING and P.G.H. SANDARS, J. Phys. B, Atom. Mol. Phys. 9L, 237 (1976)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. (24).
    E.M. HENLEY and L. WILETS, University of Washington, Preprint RLO 1388713Google Scholar
  25. (25).
    C.E. LOVING and P.G. SANDARS, J. Phys. B, Atom. Mol. Phys. 8L, 336 (1975)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. (26).
    D.C. SOREIDE and E.N. FORTSON, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 20, 491 (1975)Google Scholar
  27. (27).
    D.C. SOREIDE et al., Phys. Rev. Letters, 36, 352 (1976)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. (28).
    P.G.H. SANDARS, Invited paper to the FICAP Conference (this book)Google Scholar
  29. (29).
    E.N. FORTSON, Invited paper to the FICAP Conference (this book)Google Scholar
  30. (30).
    M.A. BOUCHIAT and L. POTTIER, J. Phys. Lettres 37 L–79 (1976)Google Scholar
  31. (31).
    M.A. BOUCHIAT and L. POTTIER, J. Phys. Lettres 36 L–189 (1975)Google Scholar
  32. (32).
    M.A. BOUCHIAT and L. POTTIER, Preprint E.N.S., March 1976, to be published in Phys. Letters B, 62B, 327 (1976)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Bouchiat
    • 1
  • M. A. Bouchiat
    • 1
  • L. Pottier
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Physique de l’Ecole Normale SupérieureParis Cedex 05France

Personalised recommendations