Advertisement

Effect of Ice Contamination on Liquid-Nitrogen Drops in Film Boiling

  • G. J. Schoessow
  • C. E. Chmielewski
  • K. J. Baumeister
Part of the Advances in Cryogenic Engineering book series (ACRE, volume 23)

Abstract

Leidenfrost film boiling data of discrete masses of a cryogenic fluid were first reported by Keshock and Bell [1,2]. These authors attempted to correlate their cryogenic data using the equations developed by Baumeister et al. [3] from standard laminar film boiling theory. This theory had been found to successfully correlate data for conventional fluids such as water, ethanol, benzene, and carbon tetrachloride. However, Keshock and Bell found the measured drop vaporization times were as much as 30% shorter than predicted by the equations developed by Baumeister et al. [3] even after the contributions of heat transfer by radiation and free convection to the droplet’s upper surface were considered. To account for this discrepancy, the effects of ice contamination and mass transfer from the upper surface of the drop were experimentally investigated in this study. In particular, ice formation in the drop from contamination was found to significantly affect the vaporization times of liquid nitrogen drops.

Keywords

Free Convection Heat Transfer Surface Vaporization Time Drop Shape Cryogenic Fluid 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    E. G. Keshock, Ph.D. Dissertation, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma (1968).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. G. Keshock and K. J. Bell, in: Advances in Cryogenic Engineering, Vol. 15, Plenum Press, New York (1970), p. 271.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. J. Baumeister, T. D. Hamill, and G. J. Schoessow, in: Proceedings of 3rd Intern. Heat Transfer Conference, Vol. 4, AIChE, New York (1966), p. 66.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. J. Baumeister, E. G, Keshock, and D. A. Pucci, in: Advances in Cryogenic Engineering, Vol. 16, Plenum Press, New York (1971), p. 445.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. J. Schoessow and K. J. Baumeister, in: Proceedings of 4th Intern. Heat transfer Conference, Vol. 5, Boiling, A. Grigull and E. Hohne, eds., Elsevier, New York (1970), p. B3. 11. 1.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    C. E. Chmielewski, M. S. Thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida (1974).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. J. Schoessow and K. J. Baumeister, Chem. Eng. Progr. Symp. Ser 118 68: 156 (1972).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    K. J. Baumeister and G. J. Schoessow, Chem. Eng. Progr. Symp. Ser. 92 65: 167 (1969).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press · New York and London 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. J. Schoessow
    • 1
  • C. E. Chmielewski
    • 1
  • K. J. Baumeister
    • 1
  1. 1.NASA Lewis Research CenterClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations