Parietooccipital Symptomology: The Split-Brain Perspective

  • Joseph E. LeDoux
Part of the Handbook of Behavioral Neurobiology book series (HBNE, volume 2)

Abstract

During the period in which Lashley was promoting the view that cortical functions in the rat defied localization, clinical observations of humans with focal brain lesions were painting quite a different picture of cerebral organization. Localized damage to specific cortical regions was found to result in specific behavioral disturbances. Moreover, the behavioral disorders that emerged seemed to be dependent on the hemisphere damaged as well as on the intrahemispheric location of the pathology. This approach to brain and behavior caught on, and the field of neuropsychology was the result.

Keywords

Stein Weinstein Aphasia Lewin Apraxia 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arrigoni, G., and DeRenzi, E. Constructional apraxia and hemispheric focus of lesion. Cortex (Milano), 1964, 1, 170–197.Google Scholar
  2. Azulay, A., and Schwartz, A. S. The role of the dorsal funiculus in tactile discrimination. Experimental Neurology, 1975, 46, 315–332.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Battersby, N. S., Bender, M. B., Pollack, M., and Kahn, R. L. Unilateral spatial agnosia. Brain, 1956, 79, 68–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benton, A. L. Right-Left Discrimination and Finger Localization:Devebpment and Pathology. New York: Hoeber-Harper, 1959.Google Scholar
  5. Berlucchi, G. Cerebral dominance and interhemispheric communication in normal man. In F. O. Schmitt (ed.). The Neurosciences: Third Study Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  6. Berlucchi, G. Some features of interhemispheric communication of visual information in brain damaged cats and normal humans. In F. Michel and B. Schott (eds.), Les Syndromes de Disconnexion Calleuse chez l’Homme. Lyon: Colloque International de Lyon, 1974.Google Scholar
  7. Bisiach, E., Nichelli, P., and Spinnler, H. Hemispheric functional asymmetry in visual discriminations between invariant stimuli. Neuropsychologia, 1976, 14, 335–342.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bogen, J. E., and Gazzaniga, M. S. Cerebral commissurotomy in man: Minor hemisphere dominance for certain visuo-spatial functions. Journal of Neurosurgery, 1965, 23, 394–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brain, R. Visual disorientation with special reference to lesions of the right cerebral hemisphere. Brain, 1941, 64, 244–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corkin, S., Milner, B., and Rasmussen, T. Somatosensory thresholds: Contrasting of postcentral-gyrus and posterior parietal-lobe excisions. Archives of Neurology (Chicago), 1970, 23, 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Critchley, M. The Parietal Lobes. London: E. Arnold, 1953.Google Scholar
  12. Denny-Brown, D., and Banker, B. Amorphosynthesis from left parietal lesions. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 1954, 71, 302–313.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Denny-Brown, D., and Chambers, R. A. The parietal lobe and behavior. Research Publications, Association for Research in Nervous and Mental Disease, 1958, 36, 36–117.Google Scholar
  14. DeRenzi, E., and Spinnler, H. Visual recognition in patients with unilateral cerebral damage. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 1965, 142, 515.Google Scholar
  15. DeRenzi, E., and Spinnler, H. Facial recognition in brain damaged patients—An experimental approach. Neurology, 1966, 6, 145–153.Google Scholar
  16. DeRenzi, E., Scotti, G., and Spinner, H. Perceptual and associative disorders of visual recognition. Neurology, 1969, 9, 634–642.Google Scholar
  17. Duensing, F. Raumagnostische und ideatorischapraktische Störung des gestaltenden handelns. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Neruenheilkunde, 1953, 170, 72–94.Google Scholar
  18. Ettlinger, G., Warrington, E., and Zangwill, O. L. A further study of visuo-spatial agnosia. Brain, 1957, 80, 335–361.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ettlinger, G., Morton, H. B., and Muffett, A. Tactile discrimination in the monkey. Cortex, 1966, 2, 5–29.Google Scholar
  20. Evans, J. P. A study of the sensory defects resulting from excision of cerebral substance in humans. Publication of the Association for Research in Nervous and Mental Disease, 1935, 15, 331–370.Google Scholar
  21. Franco, L., and Sperry, R. W. Hemisphere lateralization for cognitive processing of geometry. Neuropsychologia, 1977, 15, 107–113.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fredericks, J. A. M. Het Lichaamsschema. Amsterdam: Van Rossen, 1961.Google Scholar
  23. Fredericks, J. A. M. Disorders of the body schema. In P. J. Vinken and G. W. Bruyn (eds.), Handbook of Clinical Neurology. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1969.Google Scholar
  24. Gazzaniga, M. S., and LeDoux, J. E. The Integrated Mind. New York: Plenum, 1978.Google Scholar
  25. Gazzaniga, M. S., Bogen, J. E., and Sperry, R. W. Dyspraxia following division of the cerebral commissures. Archives of Neurology (Chicago), 1967, 16, 606–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gazzaniga, M. S., LeDoux, J. E., and-Wilson, D. H. Language, praxis, and the right hemisphere. Neurology, 1977, 27, 1140–1147.Google Scholar
  27. Geffen, G., Bradshaw, J. L., and Wallace, G. Interhemispheric effects on reaction time to verbal and non-verbal stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971, 87, 415–422.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gerstmann, J. Fingeragnosie. Eine umschriebene Störung der Orientierung am eigenen Körper. Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift, 1924, 57, 1010–1012.Google Scholar
  29. Geschwind, N. Disconnexion syndromes in animals and man. Brain, 1965, 88, 237–294, 584–644.Google Scholar
  30. Geschwind, N. Discussion No. 5. In F. Michel and B. Schutt (eds.), Les Syndromes de Disconnexion Calleuse chez l’Homme. Lyon: Colloque International, 1974.Google Scholar
  31. Gibson, J. J. Observations on active touch. Psychological Review, 1962, 69, 477–491.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gross, M. M. Hemisphere specialization for processing of visually presented verbal and spatial stimuli. Perception and Psychophysiology, 1972, 12, 357–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Head, H. Studies in Neurology. London: Oxford University Press, 1920.Google Scholar
  34. Hécaen, H., and Angelergues, R. La Cécité Psychique. Paris: Masson et Cie, 1963.Google Scholar
  35. Hécaen, H., and de Ajuriaguerra, J. Les Gauchers: Prévalence Manuelle et Dominance Cérébrale. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1963.Google Scholar
  36. Hécaen, H., de Ajuriaguerra, J., and Massonet, J. Les troubles visuoconstructifs par lésion pariétooccipitale droite: Rôle des perturbations vestibulaires. Encéphale, 40, 122–179.Google Scholar
  37. Hécaen, H., Penfield, W., Bertrand, G., and Malmo, R. The syndrome of apractognosia due to lesion of the minor cerebral hemisphere. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry (Chicago), 1956, 75, 400–434.Google Scholar
  38. Holmes, G. Disturbances of visual orientation. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1918, 2, 449–468.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hyvarinen, J., and Poranen, A. Function of the parietal associative area 7 as revealed from cellular discharges in alert monkeys. Brain, 1974, 97, 673–692.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jones, E. G., and Powell, T. P. S. An anatomical study of converging sensory pathways within the cerebral cortex of the monkey. Brain, 1970, 93, 793–820.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kimura, D. Dual functional asymmetry of the brain in visual perception. Neuropsychologia, 1966, 4, 21b–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kimura, D., and Durnford, M. Normal studies on the function of the right hemisphere in vision. In S. J. Dimond and J. G. Beaumont (eds.), Hemisphere Function in the Human Brain. New York: Halsted Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  43. Kinsbourne, M., and Warrington, E. K. A study of finger agnosia. Brain, 1962, 85, 47–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Klien, R. Zur Symptomatologie des Parietallappens. Nervenartz, 1931, 6, 1–7, 67–74.Google Scholar
  45. Kliest, K. Gehimpathologie. Leipzig: Barth, 1934.Google Scholar
  46. Krueger, E. G., Price, P. A., and Teuber, H. L. Tactile extinction in parietal lobe neoplasms, Journal of Psychology, 1954, 38, 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lange, J. Agnosien and Apraxien. In O. Bunke and O. Foerster (eds.), Handbusch der Nerrologíe. Berlin: Springer, 1936.Google Scholar
  48. LeDoux, J. E., Wilson, D. H., and Gazzaniga, M. S. Manipulo-spatial aspects of cerebral lateralization: Clues to the origin of lateralization. Neuropsychologia, 1977, 15, 743–750.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Levy-Agresd, J., and Sperry, R. W. Differential perceptual capacities in minor and major hemispheres. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1968, 61, 1151.Google Scholar
  50. Lewin, W., and Phillips, C. G. Observations on partial removal of the post-central gyrus for pain. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 1952, 15, 143–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lhermitte, J., Levy, G., and Kyriaco, N. Les perturbations de la représentation spatiale chez les apraxiques. Revue Neurologique, 1925, 2, 586–600.Google Scholar
  52. Lissauer, H. Ein Fall von Seelenblindheit nebst einem Beitrag zur Theorie derselben. Archiv fuer Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten, 1890, 21, 222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lunn, V. Om Legemshevidsthdenen. Copenhagen: E. Munksgard, 1948.Google Scholar
  54. Marie, P., Bouttier, H., and Bailey, P. La planotopokinésie: Etude sur les erreurs d’exécution de certains mouvments dans leurs rapports avec la représentation spatiale. Revue Neurologique, 1922, 1, 505–512.Google Scholar
  55. Mayer-Gross, W. Some observations on apraxia. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 1935, 28, 1203–1212.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Mayer-Gross, W. The question of visual impairment in constructional apraxia. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 1936, 29, 1396–1400.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. McFie, J., and Zangwill, O. L. Visual constructive disabilities associated with lesions of the left cerebral hemisphere. Brain, 1960, 83, 243–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. McFie, J., Piercy, M. F., and Zangwill, O. L. Visual spatial agnosia associated with lesions of the right cerebral hemisphere. Brain, 1960, 73, 167–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Milner, B., and Taylor, L. Right hemisphere superiority in tactile pattern recognition after cerebral commissurotomy: Evidence for nonverbal memory. Neuropsychologia, 1972, 10, 1–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mountcastle, V. B., Lynch, J. C., Georgopoulos, A., Sakata, H., and Acuna, G. Posterior parietal association cortex of the monkey: Command functions for operations within extrapersonal space. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1975, 55, 871.Google Scholar
  61. Nebes, R. Superiority of the minor hemisphere in commissurotomized man for the perception of part-whole relations. Cortex, 1971, 7, 333–349.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Nebes, R. Dominance of the minor hemisphere in commissurotomized man on a test of figural unification. Brain, 1972, 95, 633–638.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Nebes, R. Perception of spatial relationships by the right and left hemispheres of commissurotomized man. Neuropsychologia, 1973, 11, 285–289.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Paterson, A., and Zangwill, O. L. Disorders of visual space perception associated with lesions of the right cerebral hemisphere. Brain, 1944, 67, 331–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Piercy, M., and Smyth, V. O. G. Right hemisphere dominance for certain non-verbal intellectual skills. Brain, 1962, 85, 775–790.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Piercy, M., Hécaen, H., and de Ajuriaguerra, J. 1960. Constructional apraxia associated with unilateral cerebral lesions. Left and right sided cases compared. Brain, 1960, 83, 225–242.Google Scholar
  67. Riddoch, G. Visual disorientation in homonymous half-fields. Brain, 1935, 58, 376–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Risse, G., LeDoux, J., and Gazzaniga, M. Unpublished observation, 1976.Google Scholar
  69. Risse, G., LeDoux, J., Springer, S., Wilson, D., and Gazzaniga, M. The anterior commissure in man: Functional variation in a multisensory system. Neuropsychologia, 1977, 16, 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schneider, G. Two visual systems. Science, 1969, 163, 895–902.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Selecki, B. R., and Herrón, J. T. Disturbances of the verbal body image: A particular syndrome of sensory aphasia. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 1965, 141, 42–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Semmes, J. A non-tactual factor in astereognosis. Neuropsychologia, 1965, 5, 295–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Semmes, J., and Mishkin, M. 1965. Somatosensory loss in monkeys after ipisilateral cortical ablations. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1965, 28, 473–486.Google Scholar
  74. Semmes, J., Weinstein, S., Ghent, L., and Teuber, H. L. Somatosensory Changes after Penetrating Brain Wounds in Man. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1960.Google Scholar
  75. Stein, B. E., and Arigbede, M. O. Unimodal and multimodal properties of neurons in cat superior colliculus. Experimental Neurology, 1972, 36, 179–196.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sullivan, M., and Hamilton, C. Interocoular transfer of reversed and non-reversed discriminations via the anterior commissure in monkeys. Physiology and Behavior, 1973, 10, 355–359.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Trevarthen, C. Two mechanisms of vision in primates. Psychologische Forschung 1968, 31, 299–337.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wall, P. D. The sensory and motor role of impulses traveling in the dorsal columns. Brain, 1970, 93, 505–524.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Warrington, E., and James, M. Disorders of visual perception in patients with localized cerebral lesions. Neuropsychologia, 1967, 5, 253–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Warrington, E. K., James, M., and Kinsbourne, M. Drawing disability in relation to laterality of lesion. Brain, 1966, 89, 53–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Woolf, H. G. Discussion of Teuber’s paper. In V. B. Mountcastle (ed.), Interhemispheric Relations and Cerebral Dominance. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1962.Google Scholar
  82. Wright, G. H. The names of the parts of the body. Brain, 1956, 79, 188–210.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Zaidel, E., and Sperry, R. W. Performance on Raven’s colored progressive matrices tests by commissurotomy patients. Cortex, 1973, 9, 34.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph E. LeDoux
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeurologyCornell University Medical CollegeNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations