Why Does Using Imagery in Psychotherapy Lead to Change?

  • Donald Meichenbaum
Part of the Emotions, Personality, and Psychotherapy book series (EPPS)

Abstract

Desensitization, emotive imagery, aversive images, implosive images, covert modeling, “depth” images, psychosynthesis, eidetic therapy, guided affective images... one could continue conservatively to index over 20 ways images have been used in psychotherapy. Success is claimed for each procedure. By now, you may be impressed, if not overwhelmed, by the plethora of imagery techniques used in psychotherapy. It is almost as if we had given psychotherapists a creativity task and asked them to answer the following item: “What are all of the unusual uses of imagery in psychotherapy?” Only the therapist’s imagination and degree of chutzpa seem to restrict what he asks his client to imagine under the so-called rationale of psychotherapy.* Assagioli (1965) asked patients to imagine that their bodies were being consumed in flames in order to experience a degree of freedom and a sense of “spiritual essence.” Luenar (1969) (see chap. 5) requested clients to imagine scenes involving meadows, mountains, and brooks. Wolpe (1958) had clients imagine phobic scenes along a graded hierarchy. In all of its varieties, imagery has been embraced as a psychotherapeutic tool with a fervor that bears critical evaluation.

Keywords

Gall Posit Metaphor 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Assagioli, R. Psychosynthesis: A collection of basic writings. New York: Viking, 1965.Google Scholar
  2. Beck, A. Role of fantasies in psychotherapy and psychopathology. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 1970, 150, 3–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Birk, L. Biofeedback: Behavioral medicine. Seminars in Psychiatry, 1974, 4, 361–367.Google Scholar
  4. Feather, B., and Rhoads, J. Psychodynamic behavior therapy: Theory and rationale. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1972, 26, 496–506.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Frank, J. Persuasion and healing. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  6. Janis, I. Psychological stress. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1958.Google Scholar
  7. Kazdin, A. Covert modeling and the reduction of avoidance behavior, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1973, 81, 87–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kazdin, A. Covert modeling, model similarity, and reduction of avoidance behavior. Behavior Therapy, 1974, 5, 325–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lazarus, A. Behavior therapy and beyond. New York: McGraw Hill, 1971.Google Scholar
  10. Leunar, H. Guided affective imagery: A method of intensive psychotherapy. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 1969, 23, 4–22.Google Scholar
  11. Marmor, J. The psychodynamics of realistic worry. Psychoanalysis and Social Science, 1958, 5, 155–163.Google Scholar
  12. Meichenbaum, D. Examination of model characteristics in reducing avoidance behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 17, 298–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Meichenbaum, D. Cognitive-behavior modification: An integrative approach. Plenum Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  14. Pylyshyn, Z. What the mind’s eye tells the mind’s brain: A critique of mental imagery. Psychological Bulletin, 1973, 80, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Raimy, V. Misunderstanding of the self: Cognitive psychotherapy and the misconception hypothesis. San Francisco: Josey Bass, 1975.Google Scholar
  16. Richardson, A. Mental practice: A review and discussion. Part I. Research Quarterly, 1967a, 38, 95–107.Google Scholar
  17. Richardson, A. Mental practice: A review and discussion. Part II. Research Quarterly, 1967b, 38, 263–273.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Rosten, L. The joys of Yiddish. New York: McGraw Hill, 1968.Google Scholar
  19. Sarason, I. Test anxiety and the self-disclosing coping model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1975, 43, 148–153.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sarbin, T. Imagining as muted role-taking: A historical-linguistic analysis. In P. Sheehan (Ed.), The function and nature of imagery. New York: Academic Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  21. Singer, J. L. The inner world of daydreaming. New York: Harper and Row, Colophon, 1975.Google Scholar
  22. Singer, J. L., and Antrobus, J. S. Daydreaming, imaginai processes and personality: A normative study. In P. Sheehan (Ed.), The function and nature of imagery. New York: Academic Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  23. Singer, J. L., and McCraven, V. Some characteristics of adult daydreaming. Journal of Psychology, 1961, 51, 151–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Strupp, H. Specific vs. non-specific factors in psychotherapy and the problem of control. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1970, 23, 393–401.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Wilkins, W. Parameters of therapeutic imagery: Directions from case studies. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 1974, 11, 163–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wolpe, J. Psychotherapy by reciprocal inhibition. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1958.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald Meichenbaum
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations