Advertisement

Antihypertensive Treatment in Renal Failure

  • Francois C. Reubi
Part of the Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine book series (DICM, volume 35)

Abstract

Renal failure may alter the disposition of antihypertensive drugs. The half-life of methyldopa, guanethidine, clonidine captopril and the lipid-insoluble beta blockers may be prolonged. However, the best guide to adequate dosage is the blood pressure response. Furosemide has definite advantages over current thiazid diuretics. Potassium-sparing agents may cause hyperkalemia and should be avoided.

The effects of antihypertensive drugs on renal function vary with time. The initial fall in GFR, responsible for a transient rise in serum creatinine, is followed by a progressive readjustment towards pretreatment values. After years of sustained treatment the drug-specific effects have become negligible, and effective control of hypertension often produces stabilization or improvement of renal function.

Drug combinations including furosemide, a beta blocker and a vasodilator, are generally adequate for long-term treatment. For initiating therapy preference may be given to agents which do not depress markedly GFR. In emergency situations any potent drug may be given. If necessary, transient uremia should be treated by hemodialysis.

Keywords

Glomerular Filtration Rate Essential Hypertension Antihypertensive Drug Sodium Nitroprusside Blood Pressure Response 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Reubi FC, Vorburger C, Bütikofer E: A comparison of the short-term and long-term hemodynamic effects of antihypertensive drug therapy. In.: Conolly ME (ed), Catapres in hypertension. Butterworths, London, 1970, pp 113–125.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mirkin BL, Green TP, O’Dea RF: Disposition and pharmacodynamics of diuretics and antihypertensive agents in renal disease. Europ J Clin Pharmacol (18):109–116, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rane A, Villeneuve JP, Stone WJ, Nies AS, Wilkinson GR, Branch RA: Plasma binding and disposition of furosemide in the nephrotic syndrome and in uremia. Clin Pharmacol Ther (24):199–207, 1978.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McLeod PJ, Ogilvie RI, Ruedy J: Effects of large and small doses of hydrochlorothiazide in hypertensive patients. Clin Pharmacol Ther (11):733–739, 1978.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reubi FC: Clinical use of furosemide. Ann N Y Acad Sci (139):433–442, 1966.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bennett WM, Singer I, Golper T, Feig P, Coggins CJ: Guidelines for drug therapy in renal failure. Ann Int Med (86):754–783, 1977.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pillay VKG, Schwartz FD, Ami K: Transient and permanent deafness following treatment of ethacrynic acid in renal failure. Lancet (l):77–79, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Koch-Weser J: Drug therapy: Metoprolol. New Engl J Med (301):698–703, 1979.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thompson FD, Joekes AM, Foulkes DM: Pharmacokinetics of propranolol in renal failure. Brit Med J (2):434–436, 1972.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Johnsson G, Regardh CG: Clinical pharmacokinetics of β-adrenoreceptor blocking drugs. Clin Pharmacokinet (1):233–263, 1976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thompson FD, Joekes AM, Hussein MM: Labetalol used as a hypotensive agent in the presence of renal disease. Kidney Int (11):287–288, 1977.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ohnhaus EE, Heidemann H, Meier J, Maurer G: Metabolism of pindolol in patients with renal failure. Europ J Clin Pharmacol (22):423–428, 1982.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    McKinstry, Dreyfuss J: Pharmacokinetics of nadolol. In: Gross F (ed), International experience with nadolol. The Royal Soc Med, London, 1981, pp 31–37.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stenbaek O, Myhre E, Brodwall EK, Hansen T: Hypotensive effect of methldopa in renal failure associated with hypertension. Acta Med Scand (191):333–337, 1973.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    O’Dea RF, Mirkin BL: Metabolic disposition of methyldopa in hypertensive and renal-insufficient children. Clin Pharmacol Ther (27):37–43, 1980.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rahn KH: Influence of renal function on plasma levels, urinary excretion, metabolism and antihypertensive effect of guanethidine in man. Clin Nephrol (l):14–23, 1973.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hulter HN, Licht JH, Ilnicki LP: Clinical efficacy and pharmacokinetics of clonidine in hemodialysis and renal insufficiency. J Lab Clin Med (94):223–231, 1979.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Eichelbaum M, Somogyi A, von Unruh GE, Dengler HJ: Simultaneous determination of the intravenous and oral pharmacokinetic parameters of verapamil using stable isotopelabelled verapamil. Europ J Clin Pharmacol (19):133–137, 1981.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Reidenberg MM, Dennis D, De Marco AL, Bello CT: Hydralazine elimination in man. Clin Pharmacol Ther (14):970–977, 1973.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brogden RN, Heel RC, Speight TM, Avery GS: Prazosin: A review of its pharmacological properties. Drugs (14):163–197, 1977.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gottlieb TB, Thomas RC, Chidsey CA: Pharmacokinetic studies of minoxidil. Clin Pharmacol Ther (13):436–441, 1972.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Palmer RF, Lasseter KC: Sodium nitroprusside. New Engl J Med (292):294–297, 1975.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kripalani KJ, McKinstry DN, Singhui SM, Willard DA, Vucovich RA, Migdalof BH: Disposition of captopril in normal subjects. Clin Pharmacol Ther (27):636–641, 1980.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Havelka J, Boer1in HJ, Studer A, Greminger P, Tenschert W: Long-term experience with captopril in severe hypertension. Br J Clin Pharmacol (14):71S–76S, 1982.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    O’Malley K, Velasco MV, Pruitt A: Decreased plasma protein binding of diazoxide in uremia. Clin Pharmacol Ther (18):53–58, 1975.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Onesti G, Brest AN, Novack P, Kasparian H, Moyer JH: Pharmacodynamic effects of alpha-methyldopa in hypertensive subjects. Am Heart J (67):32–38, 1964.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Reubi FC: Role of physical factors in the acute changes in renal function elicited by antihypertensive drugs. Europ J Clin Pharmacol (13):185–193, 1978.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gilmore E, Weil J, Chidsey C: Treatment of essential hypertension with a new vasodilator in combination with betaadrenergic blockade. New Engl J Med (282):521–527, 1970.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Danesh BJZ, Brunton J: Nadolol and renal hemodynamics. In: Gross F (ed), International experience with nadolol. The Royal Soc Med London, 1981, pp 87–95.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Onesti G, Bock KD, Heimroth V, Kim KE, Merguet P: Clonidine: A new antihypertensive agent. Am J Cardiol (28):74–83, 1971.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bartorelli C, Gargano N, Regoli D, Zanchetti A: Die Wirkung langdauernder Guanethidine-Verabreichung auf die Nierenfunktion von Hochdruckkranken. Dtsch Med Wschr (85):1271–1275, 1960.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Reubi FC, Weidmann P: Relationship between sodium clearance plasma renin activity, plasma aldosterone, renal hemodynamics and blood pressure in essential hypertension. Clin Exp Hypertens (2):593–612, 1980.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Reubi FC: The late effects of hypertensive drug therapy on renal functions of patients with essential hypertension. In: Bock KD, and Cottier PT (eds), Essential hypertension. Springer, Berlin, 1960, pp 317–331.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Moyer JH, Heider C, Pevey K, Ford RV: The effect of treatment on the vascular deterioration associated with hypertension, with particular emphasis on renal function. Am J Med (24):177, 1958.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Weidmann P, Beretta-Piccoli C, Steffen F, Blumberg A, Reubi FC: Hypertension in terminal renal failure. Kidney Int (9):294–301, 1976.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ibsen H, Sederberg-Olsen P: Changes in glomerular filtration rate during long-term treatment with propranolol in patients with arterial hypertension. Clin Sci (44):129–134, 1973.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Warren DJ, Swainson CP, Wright N: Deterioration in renal function after beta-blockade in patients with chronic renal failure and hypertension. Brit Med J (2):193, 1974.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bauer JH, Brooks CS: The long-term effect of propranolol therapy on renal function. Am J Med (66):405–410, 1979.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Limas CJ, Freis ED: Minoxidil in severe hypertension with renal failure. Am J Cardiol (31):355, 1973.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Schafer HE, Schafer A: Aspekte zur Immunpathogenese der malignen hypertonic. Med Welt (16):1144–1150, 1965.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gudbrandsson T, Hansson L, Herlitz H: Immunological changes in patients with previous malignant hypertension. Lancet (l):406–408, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishing, Boston/The Hague/Dordrecht/Lancaster 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francois C. Reubi

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations