Optimal Use of Ambulatory Monitoring Prior to Hospital Discharge Following Acute Myocardial Infarction

  • Arthur J. Moss


Ambulatory (Holter) electrocardiographic monitoring was first introduced over 20 years ago [1], and during the past ten years there has been widespread application of this technique to postinfarction patients [2–4]. Advancement in technology and the quality of the Holter recordings has produced an enormous data base that has outstripped our understanding of the clinical significance of the recorded events. Holter monitoring of postinfarction patients prior to hospital discharge is nearly a routine procedure in most institutions, but how can the information generated be utilized to optimize patient care? What are we looking for when we request a Holter recording on a patient after myocardial infarction?


Ventricular Arrhythmia Left Bundle Branch Block Holter Monitoring Ambulatory Monitoring Ventricular Ectopic Beat 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Holter NJ: New method for heart studies. Science 134: 1214–1220, 1961.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moss AJ, Schnitzler R, Green R, De Camila J: Ventricular arrhythmias 3 weeks after acute myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med 75: 837–841, 1971.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kotler MN, Tabatznik B, Mower MM, Tomi- naga S: Prognostic significance of ventricular ectopic beats with respect to sudden death in the late postinfarction period. Circulation 47: 959–966, 1973.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schulze RA Jr, Rouleau J, Rigo P, Bower S, Strauss W, Pitt B: Ventricular arrhythmias in the late hospital phase of acute myocardial infarction: relation of left ventricular function detected by gated cardiac blood pool scanning. Circulation 52: 1006–1011, 1975.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kleiger RE, Miller JP, Thanavaro S, Province MA, Martin TF, Oliver GC: Relationship between clinical features of acute myocardial infarction and ventricular runs 2 weeks to 1 year after infarction. Circulation 63: 64–60, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lopes MG, Fitzgerald J, Harrison DC, Schroeder JS: Diagnosis and quantification of arrhythmias in ambulatory patients using an improved R-R interval plotting system. Am J Cardiol 35: 816–823, 1975.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moss AJ, Davis HT, De Camilla J, Bayer LW: Ventricular ectopic beats and their relation to sudden and nonsudden cardiac death after myocardial infarction. Circulation 60: 998–1003, 1979.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lown B, Wolf FM: Approaches to sudden death from coronary heart disease. Circulation 44: 130–142, 1971.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ruberman W, Weinblatt E, Goldberg JD, Frank CW, Shapiro S: Ventricular premature beats and mortality after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 297: 750–757, 1977.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bigger JT, Weld FM: Analysis of prognostic significance of ventricular arrhythmias after myocardial infarction: short-comings of Lown grading system. Br Heart J 45: 717–724, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moss AJ, Bigger JT, Case RB, Gillespie J, Goldstein R, Greenberg H, Krone R, Marcus FI, Odoroff CL, Oliver GC: Risk stratification and prognostication after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1: 716, 1983.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    HindmanMC, Wagner GS,JaroM, AitkinsJM, Scheinman MM, De Sanctis RW, Hutter AH, Yeatman L, Rubenfire M, Pujura C, Rubin M, Morris JJ: The clinical significance of bundle branch block complicating acute myocardial infarction. 2. Indication for temporary and permanent pacemaker insertion. Circulation 58: 689–699, 1978.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Leclercq JF, Slama R: Chnical relevance of supra-ventricular arrhythmias detected by Holter elec-trocardiography. In: RoelandtJ, Hugenholtz PG (eds) Long-term ambulatory electrocardiography. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1982, pp 40–50.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stern S, Tzivoni D: Evaluation for ischemic ST-T changes. In: Wenger NK, Mock MB, Ringqvist I (eds) Ambulatory electrocardiographic recording. Chicago: Year Book, 1980, pp 353–360.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stern S, Tzivoni D: Dynamic changes in the ST-T segment during sleep in ischemic heart diseases. Am J Cardiol 32: 17, 1973.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hinkle LE, Argyros DC, Robinson T, et al: Pathogenesis of an unexpected sudden death: role of early cycle ventricular premature contractions. Am J Cardiol 39: 873–879, 1977.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Coumel P: Heart rate trend analysis: patterns and clinical significance. In: RoelandtJ, Hugenholtz PG (eds) Long-term ambulatory electrocardiography. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1982, pp 51–61.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Morganroth J, Michelson EL, Horowitz LN, Josephson ME, Pearlman AS, Dunkman WB: Limitations of routine long-term electrocardiographic monitoring to assess ventricular ectopic frequency. Circulation 58: 408–414, 1978.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishing, Boston/Dordrecht/Lancaster 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arthur J. Moss

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations