Cognitive Factors in Children’s Arithmetic Errors

  • James R. Brannin


Only a few studies of computational errors in children’s arithmetic have been reported in the psychological literature. The general approach of most investigators has been to carry out a post hoc analysis of subjects’ written work in the hope of uncovering information about faulty performance. These studies have usually attempted both to provide some sort of classification scheme for errors and to draw inferences about the mental operations responsible for them (e.g. Roberts, 1968; Magne, 1978).


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Clements, M. A., 1980, Analyzing children’s errors on written mathematical tasks, Educ. Studies in Math., 37: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dantzig, T., 1968, “Number: The Language of Science”, Allen & Unwin, London.Google Scholar
  3. Englehardt, J. M., 1977, Analysis of children’s computational errors: A qualitative approach, Brit. Jour. Educ. Psychol., 47: 149–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hitch, G. J., 1978, The role of short-term working memory in mental arithmetic, Cognitive-Psychology, 10: 302–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Magne, O., 1978, The psychology of remedial mathematics, Didakometry, 59: 124–129.Google Scholar
  6. Menninger, K., 1969, “Number Words and Number Symbols”, M. I. T. Press, Boston.Google Scholar
  7. Moses, J., 1971, Symbolic integration, the stormy decade, Communications of the Assoc. of Computing Machinery, 14: 560–584.Google Scholar
  8. Ornstein, P. A., 1978, “Memory Development in Children”, Hillsdale, New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Suydam, M. N., and Reys, R. E., 1978, “Developing Computational Skills”, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, Virginia.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • James R. Brannin
    • 1
  1. 1.Brunel UniversityUxbridgeEngland

Personalised recommendations