Children’s Sensitivity to Aesthetic Properties of Line Drawings
When psychologists reflect about children’s drawings, they focus primarily on such “non-aesthetic”, cognitive aspects as representational ability, sequencing, planning strategies or accuracy in copying (e.g. Butterworth, 1977; Freeman, 1980; Goodnow, 1977; Piaget and Inhelder, 1967). When artists reflect about children’s drawings, they customarily focus on very different facets. In particular, artists are apt to search for aesthetic properties in early drawings. The child is often thought to be a natural artist, and adult artists often point to the value of the innocent eye - of seeing with the freshness of vision of the child. Paul Klee believed that the origins of art were to be found in the nursery (Gardner, 1980), and Pablo Picasso commented, “Once I drew like Raphael, but it has taken me a whole lifetime to learn to draw like children” (de Meredieu, 1974, p.13). Clearly artists and psychologists are looking at children’s drawings through different lenses.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Arnheim, R., 1974, “Art and Visual Perception”, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
- Butterworth, G., Ed., 1977, “The Child’s Representation of the World”, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
- de Meredieu, F., 1974, “Le Dessin d’Enfant, ”Editions Universitaires Jean-Pierre de Large, Paris.Google Scholar
- Freeman, N., 1980, “Strategies of Representation in Young Children”, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
- Gardner, H., 1980, “Artful Scribbles: The Significance of Children’s Drawings”, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
- Gombrich, E. H., 1960, “Art and Illusion”, Bollinger, New York.Google Scholar
- Goodman, N., 1976, “Languages of Art”, Hackett, Indianopolis.Google Scholar
- Goodnow, J., 1977, “Children Drawing”, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Piaget, J. and Inhelder, B., 1967, “The Child’s Conception of Space”, Norton, New York.Google Scholar