The Search for Parity Non-Conservation in Atoms

  • P. G. H. Sandars

Abstract

In the traditional picture of an atom the only interaction of concern is the electromagnetic, acting between the nucleons and the electrons and among the electrons themselves. As every undergraduate knows this interaction is invariant under space inversion; the atomic Hamiltonian therefore commutes with the parity operator and in the absence of degeneracy the atomic eigenstates have definite parity. The well-known parity selection rules then follow directly.

Keywords

Optical Rotation Wavelength Dependence Faraday Effect Static Electric Field Spurious Effect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

Books

  1. (i).
    Gauge theories of weak interactions. J. C. Taylor, Cambridge (1976)Google Scholar
  2. (ii).
    Weak interactions. D. Bailin, Sussex (1977)Google Scholar

Review References

  1. a.
    Proceeding of Internation Workshop on Neutral Current Interactions in Atoms, ed. W. L. Williams, Cargèse 1979.Google Scholar
  2. b.
    Sandars, P. G. H. in ‘Exotic Atoms’ ed. Crowe, K. et al, Plenum Press, 1980Google Scholar
  3. c.
    Commins, E. D. and Bucksbaum, P. H., Ann. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 30; 1 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. d.
    Fortson, E. N. and Wilets, L., Advances in Atomic and Molecular Physics 16; 319 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. e.
    Sandars, P. G. H., Physica Scripta 21; 284 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Other References

  1. 1.
    Dydak, F., Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. in press (1981).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Prescott, C. Y. et al, Phys. Letters 77B; 347 (1978).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bouchiat, M. A. and Bouchiat, C. C., Phys. Letters B 48; 11 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bouchiat, M. A., Poirier, M. and Bouchiat, C. C, Journal de Physique 40; 1127 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 4a.
    Dunford, R. W., Lewis, R. R. and Williams, W. L., Phys. Rev. A 18, 2421 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 5.
    Baird, P. E. G. et al, Paper presented to VII Vavilov Conference on Non-Linear Optics, Novosibirsk, (1981).Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    Barkov, L. M. and Zolotorev, M. S., J.E.T.P. Lett. 27; 357 (1978). Phys. Letters 85B; 308 (1979).Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    Bogdanov, Y. V., Sobel’man, I. I., Sorokin, V. N. and Struck I. I., J.E.T.P. Letters 32; 214 (1979).Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    Hollister, J. H. et al, Phys. Rev. Letters 46; 643 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 9.
    Bouchiat, M. A. and Pottier, L., in reference (a) p.122 (1980).Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    Bucksbaum, P., Commins, E. and Hunter L., Phys. Rev. Letters 46; 640 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 11.
    Wieman, C. A. in ref. (a) p.213 (1979).Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    Trainor, T. A. in ref. (a) p.231 (1979).Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    Hinds, E. A., Phys. Rev. Letters 44; 374 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 14.
    Fortson, E. N., Private communication (1981).Google Scholar
  16. 15.
    Bucksbaum, P., in reference (a).Google Scholar
  17. 16.
    Bouchiat, M. A. and Bouchiat, C. C., J. Physique 35; 899 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 17.
    Drukarev, E. G. and Moskalev, A. N., J.E.T.P. 46; 1078 (1977).Google Scholar
  19. 18.
    Sushkov, O. P. and Flambaum, V. V., J.E.T.P. 48; 608 (1978).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. G. H. Sandars
    • 1
  1. 1.Clarendon LaboratoryOxford UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations