Skip to main content

Considerations for Quantitative NDE and NDE Reliability Improvement

  • Chapter
Book cover Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation

Part of the book series: Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data ((RPQN,volume 2A))

Abstract

A challenge has been presented to the scientific community to apply “first principles” to the understanding, prediction, and control of nondestructive evaluation (NDE) processes and applications. The success of the program is evident in the attention of new researchers and in the diversity of scientific specializations that have been directed to NDE problems. Critique of the program has been in awareness of existing technology and in focus of resources. An approach based on “lessons learned” is suggested for meeting continuing challenges and projected challenges of the future. “Lessons learned” from NDE reliability assessment programs are reviewed. Quantitative NDE performance as a function of signal-to-noise ratio is discussed. Focus of future efforts on signal-to-noise improvements in production and maintenance environments is proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Harris M. Burte, D.E. Chimenti, R.B. Thompson and D.O. Thompson, “The Middle Ground of the NDE Ramp;D Spectrum,” Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE, Vol. 2, Plenum Pub. Corp., New York, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W.D. Rummel, P.H. Todd, Jr., S.A. Frecska and R.A. Rathke, “The Detection of Fatigue Cracks by Nondestructive Testing Methods,” NASA Cr-2369, February 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B.G. Martin and C.J. Adams, “Detection of Lack-of-Fusion in Aluminum Weldments by Ultrasonic Shear Waves,” Materials Research and Standards, Vol. 6, No. 9, 440, 442, September 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D.M. Corbly, P.F. Packman and H.S. Pearson, “The Accuracy and Precision of Ultrasonic Shear Wave Flaw Measurements as a Function of Stress on the Flaw,” Materials Evaluation, Vol, 30, No. 5, 104–110, May 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D.O. Thompson, Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE, Vol. 2, Plenum Publishing Corp., New York, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  6. K.W. Fertig, Jr. and J.M. Richardson, “Computer Simulation of Probability of Detection,” Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE, Vol. 2, Plenum Publishing Corp., New York, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A.J. Bahr and D.W. Cooley, “Analysis and Design of Eddy Current Measurement Systems,” Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE, V. 2, Plenum Publishing Corp., New York, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rummel, W.D. (1983). Considerations for Quantitative NDE and NDE Reliability Improvement. In: Thompson, D.O., Chimenti, D.E. (eds) Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data, vol 2A. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3706-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3706-5_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-3708-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-3706-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics