Ultrasonic Signal Processing for Multilayered NDE

  • Ramesh Shankar
  • Stephen S. Lane
  • Jeffrey M. Warren
Part of the Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data book series (volume 2A)

Abstract

The interpretation of ultrasonic signals in the inspection for flaws in bonded regions of multilayered specimens is difficult because of signal energy loss due to material attenuation, undesired reverberations within certain layers, and overlapping responses from different interfaces because of finite transducer bandwidth. The flaws are usually air gaps, lack of adhesion, and porosity within the bonding agent.

While ultrasonic NDE signal interpretation can always be improved with appropriate instrumentation — broader bandwidth transducers for increased resolution, for example — signal processing allows for further enhancement using a digital computer. Material attenuation can be compensated for by using digital filters that preferentially allow the higher frequency components in the ultrasonic signal, similar to “preemphasis” filters used in communications. Deconvolution of signal response broadens the effective bandwidth of the transducer and can be used to minimize dominant reverberations within a layer. The use of the cepstrum — a relatively new signal processing method — allows for the separation of overlapped responses which are visually difficult to separate.

The use of these signal processing methods is demonstrated for inspecting bronze-rubber structures with a small layer of epoxy in between.

Keywords

Porosity Attenuation Epoxy Rubber Radar 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    R. Shankar, S.S. Lane, and T.J. Paradiso, “Acoustic NDE of Multilayered Composites.” Final Technical Report under NAVSEA 05R15 sponsorship. July 1982.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    A. Peled and B. Liu,“Digital Signal Processing” J. Wiley, New York. 1976.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    O. Brigham, “The Fast Fourier Transform.” Prentice Hall. 1975.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    L. Knopoff, “Q,” Reviews of Geophysics, 2, 4, Nov. 1964.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    A.V. Oppenheim, and R.W. Schafer. Digital Signal Processing. Prentice Hall. 1975.MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    R. Shankar and R.N. McDonough, “Ultrasonic Measurement of Defects in Materials using Cepstral Processing.” Proc. of IEEE Conf. on ASSP, April 1978.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ramesh Shankar
    • 1
  • Stephen S. Lane
    • 1
  • Jeffrey M. Warren
    • 2
  1. 1.Tetra Tech, Inc.ArlingtonUSA
  2. 2.Naval Surface Weapons CenterSilver SpringUSA

Personalised recommendations