Safe Handling of Toxic Chemicals: Perspectives of a Bench Chemist and Laboratory Manager

  • J. H. Futrell
Part of the Environmental Science Research book series (ESRH, volume 26)


In a university environment we have evolved a number of working rules for handling and analysis of toxic samples: (1) secure storage and isolation of samples during workup; (2) use of less toxic surrogate compounds for calibration and testing of analytical scheme; (3) dedicated instruments, work area and personnel; (4) limited number of competent, knowledgeable, motivated personnel doing actual analyses; (5) redundant containment, verified by wipe tests; (6) medical surveillance; (7) close supervision and, (8) careful disposal of contaminated waste. We have also found it advantageous to have a toxicologist working with the analytical team and an analyst working with the toxicologists. With close collaboration and good communication of these groups serious exposure incidents have been avoided and a safe working environment has been maintained.


High Level Waste Absorbent Paper Safe Handling Rubber Glove Buddy System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    N. H. Mahle and L. A. Shadoff, The Mass Spectrometry of Chlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins, in: “Biomedical Mass Spectrometry” G. Waller, ed., In Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. J. Voorhees, I. N. Einhorn, F. D. Hileman, and L. H. Wojcik, The identification of a highly toxic bicyclophosphate ester in the combusion products of a fire-retarded urethane foam, J. Polymer Sci., 13: 293 (1975).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. H. Petajan, K. J. Voorhees, S. C. Packham, R. C. Baldwin, I. N. Einhorn, M. L. Grunnett, B. G. Dinger, and M. M. Birky, Extreme toxicity from combustion products of a fire retarded — polyurethane foam, Science, 187: 742 (1975).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Discussed by K. S. Khera and J. A. Ruddick, Polychlorodibenzo-p-dioxins: perinatal effects and the dominant lethal test in wistar rats in: “Chlorodioxins-Orgin and Fate,” E. H. Blair, ed., Adv. in Chem. Series, 120:70 (1973) and E. H. McConnell, J. A. Moore, J. K. Haseman and M. W. Harris, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 44:335 (1978).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. F. Hunt, T. M. Harvey and J. W. Russell, Oxygen as a reagent gas for the analysis of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin by negative ion chemical ionization mass spectometry, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 152 (1975).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. L. Gross, Interlaboratory validation in dioxin analysis, presented at International Symposium on Chlorinated Dioxins and Related Compounds These Proceedings.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. A. Shadoff, Personal Communication, Analytical Laboratories, 574 Building, Dow Chemical Laboratories, U.S.A., Midland, Michigan 48640. Also described briefly in reference 1.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. D. Lathrop and W. H. Wolfe, A medical surveillance program for scientists exposed to dioxins and furans. These Proceedings.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. H. Futrell
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations