Methodology of Clinical Studies on Exposed Populations

  • Renate D. Kimbrough
Part of the Environmental Science Research book series (ESRH, volume 26)


Much progress has been made in the field of toxicology as it applies to safety evaluation and in the area of trace analysis for chemicals. It is now assume by many that this technology can simply be transferred to studies of human populations in field situations. Unfortunately, many problems are encountered when this is done. The heterogeneity of the general population, the long life span of humans, the lack of information about baseline data are but a few factors. Tests to detect subclinical effects have, in many instances, not been developed to the point where they can be used as screening tools. Other tests that are used may not really be relevant for specific problems. For many such tests, it is not known how they can be used to make predicitions about the health status of the individual at the time the test is done or about his or her health in the future.


Body Burden Toxic Shock Syndrome Hemorrhagic Cystitis Quality Control System Lipid Research Clinic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bloom, A.D., Ed. Guidelines for studies of human populations exposed to mutagenic and reproductive hazards. March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation, 1275 Mamaroneck Ave., White Plains, New York 10605, 1981.Google Scholar
  2. Bondy, P.K., and Rosenberg, L.E. Metabolic control and disease. 8th Ed., W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, London, Toronto, 1980.Google Scholar
  3. Burse, V.W., Needham, L.L., Liddle, J.A., Bayse, D.D., and Price, H.A. Interlaboratory comparison for results of analyses for polybrominated biphenyls in human serum. J. Anal. Toxicol., 4:22–26, 1980.Google Scholar
  4. Cam, C., and Nogogasyan, G. Acquired toxic prophyria cutanea tarda due to HCB. JAMA., 183: 88–91, 1963.Google Scholar
  5. Cannon, S.B., Veazey, J.M., Jackson, R.S., Burse, V. W., Hayes, C., Straub, W.E., Landrigan, P.J., and Liddle, J.A. Epidemic Kepone poisoning in chemical workers. Am. J. Epidemiol, 107:529–537, 1978.Google Scholar
  6. Carter, C.D., Kimbrough, R.D., Liddle, J.A., Cline, R.E., Zack, M.M., Jr., Bartel, W.E., Kiehler, R.E., and Phillips, P.E. Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin: an accidental poisoning episode in horse arenas. Science 188: 738–740, 1975.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. Carter, J.J. Michigan’s PBB incident: Chemical mixup leads to disaster. Science, 192: 240–243, 1976.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. DeBrun, A. Biochemical toxicology of environmental agents. Elsevier North Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1976.Google Scholar
  9. Diggory, M.J.P., Landrigan, P.J., Latimer, K.P., Kimbrough, R.D., Liddle, J.A., Cline, R.E., and Smrek, A.L. Fatal parathion poisoning caused by contamination of commercial flour. Am. J. Epidemiol., 106:145–153, 1977.Google Scholar
  10. Folland, D.S., Kimbrough, R.D., Cline, R.E., Swiggart, R.C., and Schaffner, W. Acute hemorrhagic cystitis. Industrial exposure to the pesticide chlordimeform. JAMA, 239: 1052–1055, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hayabuchi, H., Yoshimura, T. and Kuratsune, M. Consumption of toxic rice oil by “Yusho” patients and its relation to the clinical response and latent period. Food Cosmet. Toxicol., 17(5):455–461, 1979.Google Scholar
  12. Kimbrough, R.D., Taylor, P.R., Zack, M.M., and Heath, C.W. Studies of human populations exposed to environmental chemcials: Considerations of Love Canal. Nat. Acad. Sc., NRC, 1982, in pressGoogle Scholar
  13. Kreiss, K., Zack, M., Kimbrough, R.D., et al. Association of blood pressure and PCB level in cross-sectional community study. JAMA, 245 (24): 2505–2509, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kreiss, K., Zack, M., Kimbrough, R.D., et al. Cross-sectional study of a community with exceptional exposure to DDT. JAMA, 245 (19) 1926–1930, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Landrigan, P.J., Wilcox, K.R., Jr., Silva, J.,Jr., Humphrey, H.E.B. Kauffman, C., Heath, C.W., Jr. Cohort study of Michigan residents exposed to polybrominated biphenyls: Epidemiologic and immunologic findings. Annal. NY Acad. Sci., 320: 284–294, 1979.ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. Landrigan, P.J., Gehlback, S.W., Rosenblum, B.F., Shoults, J.M., Candelaria, R.M., Barthel, W.F., Liddle, J.A., Smrek, A.L., Staehling, N.W., and Sanders, J.F. Epidemic lead absorption near an ore smelter. The role of particulate lead. New Eng. J. Med., 292:123–129, 1975.Google Scholar
  17. Patterson, D.G., Hill, R.H., Needham, L.L., Orti, D.L., Kimbrough, R.D., and Liddle, J.A. Hyperkeratosis induced by sunlight degradation products of the major polybrominated biphenyl in Firemaster. Science 213: 901–902, 1981.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. Rifkind, B.M. The lipid research clinic’s population studies data book. Vol. 1. The prevalence study. US DHHS, NIH Publ. No. 80 - 1527, 1980.Google Scholar
  19. Robertson, L., Parkinson, A., and Safe, S. Introduction of drug metabolizing enzymes by fractionated commercial polybrominated biphenyls (PBBs). Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 57:254–262, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sackett, D.L. Bias in analytic research. J. Chronic. Dis., 32:51–63, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shands, K.N., Schmid, G.P., Dan, B.B., et al. Toxic-shock syndrome in menstruating women: its association with tampon use and staphylococcous aureus and the clinical features in 52 cases. New Eng. J. Med., 303:1436–1442, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tackeuchi, et al. A pathological study of Minamata disease in Japan. Acta. Neuropathol., 2:40–57, 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Renate D. Kimbrough
    • 1
  1. 1.U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesCenters for Disease ControlAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations