Strategic Land Use Planning: An Evaluation of Procedural Methodology

  • Ian Masser
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 12)

Abstract

This paper reviews experience with rational system based methods in the field of strategic planning during the last twenty years. It draws heavily upon British experience because circumstances in Britain have highlighted some of the issues involved in a particularly dramatic way. This is because of the marked shift which has taken place in Britain since the late sixties from planning styles which emphasized the technical analysis of substantive issues to those which place greater stress on procedural questions in an increasingly political environment. These changes have had important implications for procedural methodology in that the traditional blue-print/master plan approach to planning has been largely replaced by procedures designed to increase the effectiveness of planning and decision-making processes in a changing environment. These reflect the many-sidedness of planning activities and the uncertain circumstances in which decision-making takes place.

Keywords

Transportation Paration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abercrombie, P., 1959, Town and Country Planning, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  2. Bolan, R.S., 1969, Community Decision Behaviour: The Culture of Planning, Journal of American Institute of Planners, 35, 301–310.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. Bolan, R.S. and Nuttall, R.L., 1975, Urban Planning and Politics, Lexington Books, Lexington, Mass.Google Scholar
  4. Boyce, D.E., Day, N.D. and McDonald, C., 1970, Metropolitan Plan-Making, Regional Science Research Institute, Philadephia, Penn.Google Scholar
  5. Bryson, J.M. and Delbecq, A.L., 1979, A Contingent Approach to Strategy and Tactics in Project Planning, Journal of the American Planning Association, 45, 167–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. BURISA, 1977, Living without the 1976 Census, BURISA Newsletter, 30, 3–8 and 31, 2–7.Google Scholar
  7. Castells, M., 1977, The Urban Question, Edward Arnold, London.Google Scholar
  8. Cater, E., 1979, Patterns of Information Use in Planning — A Study of Oxfordshire and Berkshire, Working Paper No. 39, Oxford Polytechnic Department of Town Planning, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  9. Chadwick, G., 1971, A Systems View of Planning, Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  10. Coventry-Solihull-Warwickshire Sub-Regional Study Team, 1971, The Report on the Subregional Planning Study, Coventry City Council, Coventry, UK.Google Scholar
  11. Davidoff, P., 1965, Advocacy and Pluralism in Planning, Journal of the American Planning Association, 31, 331–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dekker, F. and Mastop, H., 1979, Strategic Choice: An Application in Dutch Planning Practice, Planning Outlook, in the press.Google Scholar
  13. Faludi, A., 1973, Planning Theory, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  14. Faludi, A. et al, 1980, Leiden-Oxford: A Comparative Study of Local Planning in the Netherlands and England, Oxford Polytechnic Department of Town Planning, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  15. Floyd, M., 1978, Structure Plan Monitoring: Looking to the Future, Town Planning Review, 49, 476–485.Google Scholar
  16. Floyd, M., Sutton, A., Friend, J. and King, L., 1977, Monitoring for Development Planning, Research Report 23, Department of Environment, London.Google Scholar
  17. Friend, J.K., Power, J.M. and Yewlett, C.J.L., 1974, Public Planning: The Intercorporate Dimension, Tavistock, London.Google Scholar
  18. Harris, R. and Scott, D., 1974, The Role of Monitoring and Review in Planning, Journal of the Royal Town Planning Institute, 60, 729–732.Google Scholar
  19. Hickling, A., 1974, Managing Decisions: The Strategic Choice Approach, Mantech, Rugby.Google Scholar
  20. Hudson, B., 1979, Comparison of Current Planning Theories: Counterparts and Contradictions, Journal of the American Planning Association, 45, 387–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee, D.B., 1973, Requiem for Large Scale Models, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 39, 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Levin, P.H., 1976, Government and the Planning Process, George Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
  23. Lindblom, C.E., 1965, The Intelligence of Democracy: Decision-Making through Mutual Adjustment, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  24. McLoughlin, J.B., 1969, Urban and Regional Planning: A Systems Approach, Faber and Faber, London.Google Scholar
  25. Masser, I., 1980, The Limits to Planning, Town Planning Review, 51, 39–49.Google Scholar
  26. Masser, I., Van Hal, W., Post, W., and Van Schijndel, R., 1978, The Dynamics of Development Processes: Two Case Studies, Town Planning Review, 49, 127–148.Google Scholar
  27. Mumford, L., 1938, The Culture of Cities, Seeker and Warburg, London.Google Scholar
  28. Nijkamp, P. and Van Delft, A., 1977, Multi-Criteria Analysis and Regional Decision-Making, Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  29. Rittel, H.W.J, and Webber, M., 1973, Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning, Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Scheurwater, J. and Masser, I., 1979, An Information Analysis System for Monitoring Spatial Planning in The Netherlands, in Policy Analysis for Urban and Regional Planning, PTRC. London.Google Scholar
  31. Simon, H.A., 1965, The Shape of Automation for Man and Management, Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  32. Wedgwood-Oppenheim, F., Hart, D. and Cobley, B., 1975, An Exploratory Study of Strategic Monitoring, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  33. Wiseman, C., 1978, Selection of Major Planning Issues, Policy Sciences, 9, 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ian Masser
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Town and Regional PlanningUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations