What Reasons for Rationality? In Search of a Future for Rational Methods in Urban Planning

  • Helen Couclelis
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 12)


Back in the early seventies, Echenique ended a review of urban modelling and its problems, very appropriately, with a quotation from Don Quixote:

“Let the dogs bark, Sancho, it shows that we are moving forward.”

Echenique (1975)


Planning Process Urban Planning Rational Behaviour System Method Urban System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allen, P.M. and Sanglier, M., 1979, A Dynamic Model of Growth in a Central Place System. Geographical Analysis, 11, 256–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aron, R., 1967, Main Currents in Sociological Thought — 2, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, UK.Google Scholar
  3. Arrow, K.J., 1963, Social Choice and Individual Values, Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn.Google Scholar
  4. Ashby, W.R., 1956, An Introduction to Cybernetics, Methuen, London.MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Atkin, R.H., 1974, Mathematical Structure in Human Affairs, Crane, Russak and Company, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Batty, M., 1979, Progress, Success and Failure in Urban Modelling, Environment and Planning A, 11, 863–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berry, B.J.L., 1973, The Human Consequences of Urbanisation, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  8. Boguslaw, R., 1965, The New Utopians: A Study of System Design and Social Change, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  9. Bohr, N., 1963, Essays 1958–1962 on Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge, John Wiley, New York.MATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Buckley, W., 1967, Sociology and Modern Systems Theory, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
  11. Camhis, M., 1979, Planning Theory and Philosophy, Tavistock, London.Google Scholar
  12. Chadwick, G., 1971, A Systems View of Planning, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  13. Couclelis, H.M., 1977, Urban Development Models: Towards a General Theory. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  14. Echenique, M., 1975, Urban Development Models: Fifteen Years of Experience, in R. Baxter, et al. (Eds.), Urban Development Models, The Construction Press, Lancaster, UK.Google Scholar
  15. Faludi, A., (Ed.), 1973, A Reader in Planning Theory. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  16. Foley, D.L., 1964, An Approach to Metropolitan Spatial Structure, in M.M. Webber, et al, (Eds.) Explorations into Urban Structure, Pennsylvania University Press, Philadelphia, Penn.Google Scholar
  17. Gould, P., 1979, Signals in the Noise, in S. Gale and G. Olsson, (Eds.), Philosophy in Geography, Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  18. Hightower, H.C., 1969, Planning Theory in Contemporary Professional Education, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 326–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holling, C.S. (Ed.), 1978, Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
  20. Kuhn, T.S., 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
  21. Lee, C., 1973, Models in Planning. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  22. Lindblom, C.E., 1973, The Science of “Muddling Through”, in A. Faludi, (Ed.), A Reader in Planning Theory, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  23. MacRae, D.G., 1974, Weber, Fontana/Collins, London.Google Scholar
  24. Optner, S.L., 1973, Systems Analysis, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, UK.Google Scholar
  25. Popper, K., 1972, Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach, The Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  26. Rosenhead, J., 1979, Aspects of Robustness in Planning, Department of Statistics, London School of Economics, London, UK.Google Scholar
  27. Simmie, J.M., 1974, Citizens in Conflict, Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
  28. Simon, H.A., 1969, The Sciences of the Artificial, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  29. Wildavsky, A., 1973, If Planning is Everything, Maybe It’s Nothing, Policy Sciences, 4, 127–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wilson, A.G., 1979, Some New Methods for Dynamic Geographical Modelling: Catastrophe Theory and Bifurcation, Working Paper 254, School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.Google Scholar
  31. Winch, P., 1958, The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helen Couclelis
    • 1
  1. 1.Ministry of CoordinationAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations