Advertisement

Treating Stomach Disorders

Can We Reinstate Regulatory Processes?
  • Barbara B. Walker

Abstract

Like the simple cell membrane of the protozoan, the gastrointestinal system is responsible for extracting all of our nutritional needs from the environment. Given the wide variety of substances we ingest, this is a remarkable accomplishment. It is the result of a highly integrated system with regulatory mechanisms distributed at every level of the organism. At times the gastrointestinal system becomes disregulated, leading to various gastrointestinal and behavioral disturbances. These disorders are among the most common of all afflictions; half of our population suffers from acute gastrointestinal illnesses every year. More than 10% have chronic diseases of the digestive tract, and these diseases are a major cause of absenteeism from work (Hill & Kern, 1977).

Keywords

Peptic Ulcer Duodenal Ulcer Gastric Acid Secretion Gastric Secretion Vagal Stimulation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ádám, G. Visceroception, awareness, and behavior. In G. E. Schwartz & D. Shapiro (Eds.) Consciousness and self-regulation (Vol. 2). New York: Plenum Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  2. Ádám, G., Heffler, J., Kovacs, A., Nagy, A., & Szigeti, A. Electrographic test for the discrimination of intestinal stimuli. Acta Physiologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 1965, 27, 145–147.Google Scholar
  3. Agostoni, E., Chinnock, J., Daly, M., & Murray, J. Functional and histological studies of the vagus nerve, its branches to the heart, lungs, abdominal viscera in the cat. Journal of Physiology, 1957, 135, 182.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Aleo, S., & Nicassio, P. Auto-regulation of duodenal ulcer disease: A preliminary report of four cases. Paper presented at the Ninth Annual Meeting of the Biofeedback Society of America, Albuquerque, March 1978.Google Scholar
  5. Alexander, F. Psychosomatic medicine: Its principles and applications. New York: Norton, 1950.Google Scholar
  6. Alexander, F., & Flagg, G. W. The psychosomatic approach. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of clinical psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965.Google Scholar
  7. Ax, A. F. The physiological differentiation between fear and anger in humans. Psychosomatic Medicine, 1953, 14, 433–442.Google Scholar
  8. Beaty, E. T. Feedback assisted relaxation training as a treatment for peptic ulcers. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 1976, 1, 323–324. (Abstract)Google Scholar
  9. Bonney, G. L. W., & Pickering, G. W. Observations on the mechanism of pain in ulcers of the stomach and duodenum. Clinical Science, 1946, 6, 63–89.Google Scholar
  10. Brady, J. V. Ulcers in “executive monkeys.” Scientific American, 1958, 199, 95–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brady, J. V. Further comments on the gastrointestinal system and avoidance behavior. Psychological Reports, 1963, 12, 742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bräutigan, W., & VonRad, M. Toward a theory of psychosomatic disorders. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 1977, 28, 285–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brooks, F. Control of gastrointestinal function. London: Macmillan Co., 1970.Google Scholar
  14. Brown, P., Salmon, P., & Thien-Htut, A. E. Double-blind trial of carbenoxolone sodium capsules in duodenal ulcer therapy based on endoscopic diagnosis and follow-up. British Medical Journal, 1972, 3, 661–664.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burland, W. L., & Simkins, M. A. (Eds.). Cimetidine (Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Histamine Receptor Antagonists). Excerpta Medica, Oxford, 1977.Google Scholar
  16. Butler, M. L., & Gersh, H. Antacid vs. placebo in hospitalized gastric ulcer patients; a controlled therapeutic study. American Journal of Digestive Disorders, 1975, 20, 803–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bynum, T. E., Solomon, T. E., Johnson, L. R., & Jacobson, E. D. Inhibition of pancreatic secretion in man by cigarette smoking. Gut, 1972, 13, 361–365.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cacioppo, J. T., Sandman, C. A., & Walker, B. B. The effects of opérant heart rate conditioning on cognitive elaboration and attitude change. Psychophysiology, 1978, 15, 330–338.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cannon, W. B. The wisdom of the body. New York: Norton, 1939.Google Scholar
  20. Castell, D. Sense with cimetidine. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1978, 240, 564.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Coles, M. G. Cardiac and respiratory activity during visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972, 96, 371–379.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Coquery, J., & Lacey, J. I. The effect of foreperiod duration on the components of the cardiacresponse during the foreperiod of a reaction time experiment. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the Society for Psychophysiological Research, Denver, October 1966.Google Scholar
  23. Davenport, H. W. Physiology of the digestive tract. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishing, Inc., 1966.Google Scholar
  24. Davis, R. C., Buchwald, A. M., & Frankmann, R. W. Autonomic and muscular responses and their relation to simple stimuli. Psychological Monographs, 1955, 69 (No. 20), 1–71.Google Scholar
  25. Delaney, J. C., & Ravey, M. Cimetidine and mental confusion. Lancet, 1977, 2, 512.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Doll, R., Friedlander, P., & Pygott, F. Dietetic treatment of peptic ulcer. Lancet, 1956, 1, 5–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Donahue, P. E., Marrie, A. J., Krystosek, R., & Nyhus, L. M. Role of vagotomy in duodenal ulcers. Postgraduate Medicine, 1977, 62, 156–167.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Dunbar, H. Emotions and bodily changes. New York: Columbia University Press, 1935.Google Scholar
  29. Engel, B. T. Stimulus-response and individual-response specificity. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1960, 2, 305–313.Google Scholar
  30. Engel, B. T., & Bickford, A. F. Response specificity: Stimulus response and individual response specificity in essential hypertensives. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1961, 5, 478–489.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Engel, G. L. Studies of ulcerative colitis. II. The nature of the somatic processes and the adequacy of the psychosomatic hypotheses. American Journal of Medicine, 1954, 16, 416–433.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Evans, D. H., & Murray, J. Regeneration of nonmedullated nerve fibers. Journal of Anatomy, 1954, 88, 465.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Foltz, E. L., & Millett, F. E. Experimental psychosomatic disease states in monkeys. I. Peptic ulcer—“executive monkeys.” Journal of Surgical Research, 1964, 4, 445–453.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fordtran, J. C., Morawski, S. G., & Richardson, C. J. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of liquid antacids. New England Journal of Medicine, 1973, 288, 923–928.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gardner, E. J. Principles of genetics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1972.Google Scholar
  36. Garma, A. Peptic ulcer and psychoanalysis. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1958.Google Scholar
  37. Gillespie, G., Gray, G., & Smith, I. Short-term and maintenance cimetidine treatment in severe duodenal ulcération. In W. L. Burland & M. A. Simkins (Eds.), Cimetidine. Excerpts Medica, 1977.Google Scholar
  38. Gorman, P., & Kamiya, J. Biofeedback training of stomach pH. Paper presented to the Western Psychological Association, San Francisco, May 1972.Google Scholar
  39. Grace, W. J., & Graham, D. T. Relationship of specific attitudes and emotions to certain bodily diseases. Psychosomatic Medicine, 1952, 14, 243–251.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Graham, D. T. Psychosomatic medicine. In N. Greenfield & R. Sternbach (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1972.Google Scholar
  41. Greenberger, N. J., & Winship, D. H. Gastrointestinal disorders: A pathophysiological approach. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publisher, 1976.Google Scholar
  42. Hall, W. H. Breast changes in males on cimetidine. New England Journal of Medicine, 1976, 295, 841.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Hare, R. D. Orienting and defensive responses to visual stimuli. Psychophysiology, 1973, 10, 453–464.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Heitmann, P., & Moller, N. The effect of metoclopramide on the gastroesophageal junctional zone and the distal esophagus in man. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1970, 5, 620–626.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Heller, M. H., Levine, J., & Sohler, T. P. Gastric acidity and normally produced anxiety. Psychosomatic Medicine, 1953, 15, 509–512.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Hill, R. B., & Kern, F. The gastrointestinal tract. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1977.Google Scholar
  47. Hollander, D., & Harlan, J. Antacids vs. placebo in peptic ulcer therapy: A controlled double-blind investigation. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1973, 226, 1181–1185.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Horwich, L., & Galloway, R. Treatment of gastric ulcération with carbenoxolone sodium: Clinical and radiological evaluation. British Medical Journal, 1965, 2, 1274–1277.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hunt, J. N., & Wales, R. C. Progress in patients with peptic ulcération treated for more than five years with polidine including a double-blind trial. British Medical Journal, 1966, 3, 13–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ippoliti, A. F., Maxwell, V., & Isenberg, J. I. The effect of various forms of milk on gastric acid secretion. Annals of Internal Medicine, 1976, 84, 286–289.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. James, W. The principles of psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Jeejeebhoy, K. N. Symposium on peptic ulcer disease: Medical treatment of peptic ulcer. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 1978, 21, 17–18.Google Scholar
  53. Johnson, A. G. Controlled trial of metaclopramide in the treatment of flatulant dyspepsia. British Medical Journal, 1971, 2, 25–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kaiser, D. N., & Sandman, C. A. Physiological patterns accompanying complex problem solving during warning and non-warning conditions. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1975, 89, 357–363.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lacey, J. I. Psychophysiological approaches to the evaluation of psychotherapeutic process and outcome. In E. A. Rubinstein & M. B. Parloff (Eds.), Research in psychotherapy. Washington: American Psychological Association, 1959.Google Scholar
  56. Lacey, J. I., & Lacey, B. C. Some autonomic-central nervous system interrelationships. In P. Black (Ed.), Physiological correlates of emotion. New York: Academic Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  57. Lacey, J. I., Kagan, J., Lacey, B. C., & Moss, H. The visceral level: Situational determinants and behavioral correlates of autonomic response patterns. In P. H. Knapp (Ed.), Expression of the emotions in man. New York: International Universities Press, 1963.Google Scholar
  58. Langley, L. L. Physiology of man. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1971.Google Scholar
  59. Lawrence, J. S. Dietetic and other methods in the treatment of peptic ulcer. Lancet, 1952, 1, 482–485.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lazarus, R. S. Psychological stress and the coping process. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966.Google Scholar
  61. Lazarus, R. S. Cognitive and personality factors underlying threat and coping. In M. H. Appley & R. Trumbull (Eds.), Psychological stress: Issues in research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967.Google Scholar
  62. Lazarus, R. S., Speisman, J. C., Mordkoff, A. M., & Davison, L. A. A laboratory study of psychological stress produced by a motion picture film. Psychological Monographs, 1962, 76 (Whole No. 553).Google Scholar
  63. Lennard-Jones, J. B., & Babouris, N. Effect of different foods on the acidity of the gastric contents in patients with duodenal ulcer. Gut, 1965, 6, 113–117.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. MacGregor, I. L. The treatment of peptic ulcer. New Zealand Journal of Medicine, 1977, 86, 86–88.Google Scholar
  65. Mahl, G. F. Effect of chronic fear on the gastric secretion of HC1 in dogs. Psychosomatic Medicine, 1949, 11, 30–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Malmo, R. B., & Shagass, C. Physiologic study of symptom mechanisms on psychiatric patients under stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 1949, 11, 25–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. McCanne, T. R., & Sandman, C. A. Instrumental heart rate responses and visual perceptions: A preliminary study. Psychophysiology, 1974, 11, 283–287.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Melamed, B., & Siegel, L. Behavioral medicine. New York: Springer, 1980.Google Scholar
  69. Miller, N. E. Learning of visceral and glandular responses. Science, 1969, 163, 434–435.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Miller, N. E., & Dworkin, B. R. Effects of learning on visceral functions: Biofeedback. New England Journal of Medicine, 1977, 296, 1274–1278.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Moore, J. G., & Schenkenberg, T. Psychic control of gastric acid: Response to anticipated feeding and biofeedback training in man. Gastroenterology, 1974, 66, 954–959.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Moos, R. H., & Engel, B. T. Psychophysiological reactions in hypertensive and arthritic patients. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 1962, 6, 227–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Natelson, B. The “executive monkey” revisited. In F. P. Brooks & P. W. Evans (Eds.), Nerves and the gut. Philadelphia: C. B. Slack, 1977.Google Scholar
  74. Nelson, P. G. Cimetidine and mental confusion. Lancet, 1977, 2, 928.Google Scholar
  75. Obrist, P. A., Webb, R. A., & Sutterer, J. R. Heart rate and somatic changes during aversive conditioning and a simple reaction time task. Psychophysiology, 1969, 5, 696–723.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Palmer, W. L. The “acid test” in gastric and duodenal ulcer. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1927, 88, 1778–1780.Google Scholar
  77. Pavlov, I. P. Conditioned reflexes (G. V. Anrep, Ed. and trans.). London: Oxford University Press, 1927.Google Scholar
  78. Polish, E., Brady, J. V., Mason, J. W., Thack, J. S., & Niemeck, W. Gastric contents and the occurrence of duodenal lesions in the rhesus monkey during avoidance behavior. Gastroenterol-ogy, 1962, 43, 193–201.Google Scholar
  79. Pomerleau, O., & Brady, J. Behavioral medicine. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1979.Google Scholar
  80. Porter, R. W., Brady, J. V., Conrad, D., Mason, J. W., Galambos, R., & Rioch, D. Some experimental observations on gastrointestinal lesions in behaviorally conditioned monkeys. Psychosomatic Medicine, 1958, 20, 379–394.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Preisich, P., & Actam, G. La discrimination nonconsciente des stimuli duodenaux: Le tes de def-ferentiation d’habituation electroencephalographique. Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica, 1964, 27, 625–629.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Sandman, C. A. Physiological responses during escape and non-escape from stress in field independent and field dependent subjects. Biological Psychology, 1975, 2, 205–216.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sandman, C.A., McCanne, T. R., Kaiser, D. N., & Diamond, B. Heart rate and cardiac phase influences on visual perception. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1977, 91, 189–202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Saxon, S., & Dahle, A. Auditory threshold variations during periods of induced high and low heart rates. Psychophysiology, 1971, 8, 23–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Schachter, S., & Singer, J. E. Cognitive, social and psychological determinants of emotional state. Psychological Review, 1962, 69, 379–399.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Schwartz, G. E. Psychosomatic disorders and biofeedback: A psychobiological model of disregula-tion. In J. D. Maser & M. P. Seligman (Eds.), Psychopathology: Experimental models. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1977.Google Scholar
  87. Selye, H. The general adaptation syndrome and the diseases of adaptation. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology, 1946, 6, 117–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Streitfeld, H. S. The specificity of peptic ulcer to intense oral conflict. Psychosomatic Medicine, 1954, 16, 315–326.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Sturdevant, R., Isenberg, J., Secrist, D., & Ansfield, J. Antacid and placebo produced similar pain relief in duodenal ulcer patients. Gastroenterology, 1977, 72, 1–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Sun, D. C., & Ryan, M. L. A controlled study on the use of propantheline and amylopectin sulphate (SM-263) for recurrences of duodenal ulcer. Gastroenterology, 1970, 58, 756–761.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Taboroff, L. H., & Brown, W. H. Study of the personality patterns of children and adolescents with a peptic ulcer syndrome. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1954, 24, 602–610.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Walan, A. Studies on peptic ulcer disease with special reference to the effects of 1-hyoscyamine. Acta Medica Scandinavica Suppl, 1970, 516, 1–57.Google Scholar
  93. Walker, B. B., & Sandman, C. A. Physiological response patterns in ulcer patients: Phasic and tonic components of the electrogastrogram. Psychophysiology, 1977, 14, 393–400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Walker, B. B., & Sandman, C. A. Human visual evoked responses are related to heart rate. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1979, 93, 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Walker, B. B., Lawton, C. A., & Sandman, C. A. Voluntary control of electrogastric activity. Psychosomatic Medicine, 1978, 40, 610–619.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Weinstock, S.A. The reestablishment of intestinal control in functional colitis. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 1976, 1, 324–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Weisman, A. D. A study of psychodynamics of duodenal ulcer exacerbations with special reference to treatment and the problem of specificity. Psychosomatic Medicine, 1956, 28, 2–42.Google Scholar
  98. Weiss, J. M. Ulcers. In J. Maser & M. Seligman (Eds.), Psychopathology: Experimental models. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1977.Google Scholar
  99. Weiss, J. M., Pohorecky, L. A., Salmon, S., & Gruenthal, M. Attenuation of gastric lesions by psychological aspects of aggression in rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1976, 90, 252–259.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Welgan, P. R. Learned control of gastric acid secretion in ulcer patients. Psychosomatic Medicine, 1974, 36, 411–419.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Welgan, P. R. Biofeedback control of stomach acid secretions and gastrointestinal reactions. In J. Beatty & J. Legewie (Eds.), Biofeedback and behavior. New York: Plenum Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  102. Whitehead, W. E., Renault, P. F., & Goldiamond, I. Modification of human gastric acid secretion with opérant conditioning procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1975, 8, 147–156.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Williams, J. A., & Cox, A. (Eds.). After vagotomy. London: Buttersworth, 1969.Google Scholar
  104. Woodbury, D. M. Analgesic-antipyretics, anti-inflammatory agents and inhibitors of uric acid synthesis. In L. Goodman & A. Gilman (Eds.), The pharmacological basis of therapeutics. London: Macmillan, 1970.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara B. Walker
    • 1
  1. 1.Ann Arbor Veterans Administration Medical CenterUniversity of MichiganAnn Arbor, MichiganUSA

Personalised recommendations