Ethanol as a Reinforcer: Comparison with Other Drugs

  • Gail Winger
  • Alice M. Young
  • James H. Woods

Abstract

Although ethanol is no less a drug than compounds such as heroin, cocaine, or pentobarbital, ethanol has one distinction that has tended to place it in a category by itself. It is probably the most behaviorally active drug legally available in the United States that is purchased and used primarily because of its intoxicating properties. It is perhaps because ethanol is a legally available drug of abuse that ethanol research is funded by a governmental agency that is separate from the agency that funds research on all other drugs of abuse. It is perhaps for the same reason that ethanol is frequently given individual status in titles of journals, chapters, and books that deal with drug dependence.* It is undoubtedly for this reason that moderate ethanol use is more socially acceptable than similar use of other drugs. We would like, in this chapter, to compare ethanol to other studied psychoactive drugs with respect to its ability to maintain drug-taking behavior. Although we offer no judgment, on the basis of these comparisons, on whether ethanol deserves its singular legal status, we find the comparisons to be interesting, provocative, and, we hope, of heuristic value.

Keywords

Morphine Cocaine Ketamine Amphetamine Pentobarbital 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altshuler, H. L. and Phillips, P. E., 1978, Intragastric self-administration of drugs by the primate, in “Drug Discrimination and State Dependent Learning” (B. T. Ho, D. W. Richards, III, and D. L. Chute, eds.), pp. 263–282, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Altshuler, H. L., Weaver, S. S., Phillips, P. E., and Burch, N. R., 1975, Gastric self-administration in monkeys: Neurophysiological correlates and recent developments, Proc. West. Pharmacol. Soc. 18:58Google Scholar
  3. Balster, R. L., and Schuster, C. R., 1973, Fixed-interval schedule of cocaine reinforcement; effect of dose and infusion duration, J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 20:119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balster, R. L., and Woolverton, W., 1979, Intravenous phencyclidine self-administration by rhesus monkeys leading to physical dependence, in “Problems of Drug Dependence 1979” (L. Harris, ed.), NIDA Research Monograph 27, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  5. Begleiter, H., 1975, Alcohol consumption subsequent to physical dependence, in “Alcohol Intoxication and Withdrawal: Experimental Studies II” (M. M. Gross, ed.), pp. 373–378, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Brady, J. V., and Griffiths, R. R., 1977, Drug-maintained performance procedures and the assessment of drug-abuse liability, in “Predicting Dependence Liability of Stimulant and Depressant Drugs” (T. Thompson and K. R. Unna, eds.), pp. 165–184, University Park Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  7. Carroll, M., 1980, Phencyclidine (PCP) as a reinforcer: Oral intake by rhesus monkeys. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Montreal.Google Scholar
  8. Carroll, M., and Meisch, R. A., 1978, Etonitazine as a reinforcer: Oral intake of etonitazine by rhesus monkeys, Psychopharmacology 59:225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carroll, M., and Meisch, R. A., 1980, Oral phencyclidine (PCP) self-administration in rhesus monkeys: Effect of feeding conditions, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 214:339.Google Scholar
  10. Deneau, G. A., Yanagita, T., and Seevers, M. H., 1969, Self-administration of psychoactive substances by the monkey: A measure of psychological dependence, Psychopharma-cologia (Berlin) 16:30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Downs, D. A., and Woods, J. H., 1975, Naloxone as a negative reinforcer in rhesus monkeys: Effects of dose, schedule, and narcotic regimen, Pharmacol. Rev. 27:397.Google Scholar
  12. Downs, D. A., Harrigan, S. E., Wiley, J. N., Robinson, T. E., and Labay, R. J., 1979, Continuous stimulant self-administration in rhesus monkeys, Res. Comm. Psychol. Psychiat. Behav. 4:39.Google Scholar
  13. Falk, J. L., 1961, Production of polydipsia in normal rats by an intermittent food schedule, Science 133:195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Falk, J. L., Samson, H. H., and Winger, G., 1972, Behavioral maintenance of high concentrations of blood ethanol and physical dependence in the rat. Science 177:811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freed, E. X., Carpenter, J. A., and Hymowitz, N., 1970, Acquisition and extinction of schedule-induced polydipsia consumption of alcohol and water, Psychol. Rep. 26:915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goldberg, S. R., and Morse, W. H., 1973, Behavior maintained by intramuscular injections of morphine or cocaine in the rhesus monkey, Pharmacologist 15:236.Google Scholar
  17. Gotestam, K. G., 1973, Intragastric self-administration of medazapam in rats, Psychophar-macologia (Berlin) 28:87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Griffiths, R. R., Winger, G., Brady, J. V., and Snell, J. D., 1976, Comparison of behavior maintained by infusions of eight phenylethylamines in baboons, Psychopharmacology 50:251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heintzelman, M. E., Best, J., and Senter, R. J., 1976, Polydipsia-induced alcohol dependency in rats: A reexamination, Science 191:482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Henningfield, J. E., and Meisch, R. A., 1978, Ethanol drinking by rhesus monkeys as a function of concentration, Psychopharmacology 57:133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Herling, S., and Woods, J. H., 1980, Chlorpromazine effects on cocaine-reinforced responding in rhesus monkeys: Reciprocal modification of rate-altering effects of the drugs, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 214:354.Google Scholar
  22. Hoffmeister, F., 1979, Preclinical evaluation of reinforcing and adversive properties of analgesics, in “Mechanisms of Pain and Analgesic Compounds” (R. F. Beers and E. G. Bassett, eds.), pp. 447–466, Raven Press, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Hoffmeister, F., and Schlichting, U. U., 1972, Reinforcing properties of some opiates and opioids in rhesus monkeys with histories of cocaine and codeine self-administration, Psychopharmacologia (Berlin) 23:55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hoffmeister, F., Dycka, J., and Ramsch, K., 1980, Intragastric self-administration in the rhesus monkey: A comparison of the reinforcing effects of codeine, phenacetin and paracitamol, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 214:213.Google Scholar
  25. Hunter, B. E., Walker, D. W., and Riley, J. N., 1974, Dissociation between physical dependence and volitional ethanol consumption, Pharmacol., Biochem. Behav. 2:523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Iglauer, C., Llewellyn, M., and Woods, J. H., 1976, Concurrent schedules of cocaine injection in rhesus monkeys: Dose variations under independent and non-independent variable-interval procedures, Pharmacol. Rev., 27:367.Google Scholar
  27. Johanson, C. E., Balster, R. L., and Bonese, K., 1976, Self-administration of psychomotor stimulant drugs; the effects of unlimited access, Pharmacol., Biochem. Behav. 4:45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Karoly, A. J., Winger, G., Ikomi, F., and Woods, J. H. 1978, The reinforcing property of ethanol in the rhesus monkey, II. Some variables related to the maintenance of intravenous ethanol-reinforced responding, Psychopharmacology 58:19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kumar, R., Steinberg, H., and Stolerman, I., 1968, Inducing a preference for morphine in rats without premedication, Nature 218:564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leander, J. D., and McMillan, D. E., 1975, Schedule-induced narcotic ingestion, Pharmacol. Rev. 27:475.Google Scholar
  31. Leander, J. D., McMillan, D. E., and Harris, L. S., 1975, Schedule-induced oral narcotic self-administration: Acute and chronic effects, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 195:279.Google Scholar
  32. Lester, D., 1961, Self-maintenance of intoxication in the rat, Q. J. Stud. Alcohol 22:223.Google Scholar
  33. Lester, D., 1966, Self-selection of alcohol by animals, human variation, and the etiology of alcoholism, Q. J. Stud. Alcohol 27:395.Google Scholar
  34. McMillan, D. E., and Leander, J. D., 1976, Schedule-induced oral self-administration of etonitazine, Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 4:137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McMillian, D. E., Leander, J. D., and Ellis, F. W., 1974, Consumption of ethanol and water under schedule-induced polydipsia, Pharmacologist 16:637.Google Scholar
  36. McMillan, D. E., Waddell, F. B., and Cathcart, C. L., 1974, Establishment of physical dependence in mice by oral ingestion of morphine, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 190:416.Google Scholar
  37. McMillan, D. E., Leander, J. D., Wilson, T. W., Wallace, S. C., Fix, T., Redding, S., and Turk, R. F., 1976, Oral ingestion of narcotic analgesics by rats, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 196:269.Google Scholar
  38. Meisch, R. A., 1969, Self-administration of pentobarbital by means of schedule-induced polydipsia, Psychon. sci., 16:16.Google Scholar
  39. Meisch, R. A., 1975, The function of schedule-induced polydipsia in establishing ethanol as a positive reinforcer, Pharmacol. Rev. 27:465.Google Scholar
  40. Meisch, R. A., 1977, Ethanol self-administration: Infrahuman studies, in “Advances in Behavioral Pharmacology” (T. Thompson and P. Dews, eds.), Vol. 1, pp. 35–84, Academic Press, Inc. New York.Google Scholar
  41. Meisch, R. A., and Henningfield, J. E., 1977, Drinking ethanol by rhesus monkeys: Experimental strategies for establishing ethanol as a reinforcer, in “Alcohol Intoxication and Withdrawal: Studies in Alcohol Dependence” (M. M. Gross, ed.), Vol. IIIb, pp. 443–463, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  42. Meisch, R. A., and Stark, L., 1977, Establishment of etonitazine as a reinforcer for rats by use of schedule-induced drinking, Pharmacol., Biochem. Behav. 7:195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Meisch, R. A., and Thompson, T., 1971, Ethanol intake in the absence of concurrent food reinforcement, Psychopharmacologia (Berlin) 22:72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Meisch, R. A., and Thompson, T., 1974, Rapid establishment of ethanol as a reinforcer for rats. Psychopharmacologia (Berlin) 37:311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mello, N. K., and Mendelson, J. H., 1972, Drinking patterns during work contingent and noncontingent alcohol acquisition, Psychosom. Med., 34:139.Google Scholar
  46. Moreton, J. E., Meisch, R. A., Stark, L., and Thompson, T., 1977, Ketamine self-administration by the rhesus monkey, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 203:303.Google Scholar
  47. Myers, R. D., 1966, Voluntary alcohol consumption in animals: Peripheral and intracer-ebral factors, Psychosom. Med. 28:484.Google Scholar
  48. Myers, R. D., and Veal, W. L., 1972, The determinants of alcohol preference in animals, in “The Biology of Alcoholism, Vol. 2, Physiology and Behavior” (B. Kissin and H. Begleiter, eds.), pp. 131–168, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  49. Nathan, P. E., Titler, N. A., Lowenstein, L. M., Solomon, P., and Rossi, A. M., 1970, Behavioral analysis of chronic alcoholism Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 22:419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nichols, J. R., and Hasiao, S., 1967, Addiction liability of albino rats: Breeding of quantitative differences in morphine drinking, Science (Washington) 157:561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Numan, R., 1980, Intravenous self-administration of ethanol maintains physical dependence in rats, Soc. Neuroscience. 6:47.Google Scholar
  52. Pickens, R., and Harris, W. C., 1968, Self-administration of d-amphetamine by rats, Psychopharmacologia (Berlin) 12:158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pickens, R., and Thompson, T., 1968, Cocaine-reinforced behavior in rats: Effects of reinforcement magnitude and fixed ratio size, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 161:122.Google Scholar
  54. Pickens, R., and Thompson, T., 1971, Characteristics of stimulant drug reinforcement, in “Stimulus Properties of Drugs” (T. Thompson and R. Pickens, eds.), pp. 177–192, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  55. Samson, H. H., and Falk, J. L., 1974, Alteration of fluid preference in ethanol-dependent animals, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 190:365.Google Scholar
  56. Schuster, C. R., and Woods, J. H., 1968, The conditioned reinforcing effects of stimuli associated with morphine reinforcement. Int. J. Addict. 3:223.Google Scholar
  57. Stolerman, I., and Kumar, R., 1970, Preference for morphine in rats: Validation of an experimental model of dependence, Psychopharmacologica (Berlin) 17:137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tarika, J., and Winger, G., 1980, The effects of ethanol, phenobarbital, and baclofen on ethanol withdrawal in the rhesus monkey. Psychopharmacology 70:201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Thompson, T., and Schuster, C. R., 1964, Morphine self-administration, food-reinforced and avoidance behaviors in rhesus monkeys, Psychopharmacologia (Berlin) 5:87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Werner, T. E., Smith, S. G., and Davis, W. M., 1976, A dose-response comparison between methadone and morphine self-administration, Psychopharmacologia (Berlin) 47:209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wikler, A., Martin, W. R., Pescor, F. T., and Eades, C. G., 1963, Factors regulating oral consumption of an opioid (etonitazine) by morphine-addicted rats, Psychopharmacologia (Berlin) 5:55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wilson, M. C., Hitomi, M., and Schuster, C. R., 1971, Psychomotor stimulant self-administration as a function of dosage per injection in the rhesus monkey, Psychopharmacologia (Berlin) 22:271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Winger, G., and Woods, J. H., 1973, The reinforcing property of ethanol in the rhesus monkey, I. Initiation, maintenance and termination of intravenous ethanol-reinforced responding, Ann. N.Y. Acad. sci. 215:162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Winger, G., Stitzer, M. L., and Woods, J. W., 1975, Barbiturate-reinforced responding in rhesus monkeys: Comparison of drugs with different durations of action, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 195:505.Google Scholar
  65. Woods, J. H., 1980, Narcotic-reinforced responding: A rapid evaluation procedure, Drug Alcohol Depend. 5:223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Woods, J. H., and Schuster, C. R., 1968, Reinforcement properties of morphine, cocaine and SPA as a function of unit dose, Int. J. Addict. 3:231.Google Scholar
  67. Woods, J. H., and Schuster, C. R., 1971, Opiates as reinforcing stimuli, in “Stimulus Properties of Drugs” (T. Thompson and R. Pickens, eds.), pp. 136–175, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.Google Scholar
  68. Woods, J. H., and Winger, G. D., 1971, A critique of methods for inducing ethanol self-intoxication in animals, in “Recent Advances in Studies of Alcoholism,” (N. K. Mello and J. H. Mendelson, eds.), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  69. Woods, J. H., Ikomi, F., and Winger, G., 1971, The reinforcing property of ethanol, in “Biological Aspects of Alcohol” (M. K. Roach, W. M. Mclsaac, and P. J. Creaven, eds.), pp. 371–388, Univ. of Texan Press, Austin.Google Scholar
  70. Woods, J. H., Downs, D. A., and Villarreal, J. E., 1973, Changes in operant behavior during deprivation-and antagonist-induced withdrawal states, in “Psychic Dependence” (L. Goldberg and F. Hoffmeister, eds.), pp. 114–121 Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  71. Yanagita, T., 1968, A technique for self-administration of water-insoluble drugs to monkeys by means of chronically inplanted stomach catheters, Bull. Comm. Prob. Drug Depend, 5631.Google Scholar
  72. Yanagita, T., 1970, Self-administration studies on various dependence-producing agents in monkeys, U. Mich. Med. Cent. J. 36:216.Google Scholar
  73. Yanagita, T., 1973, An experimental framework for evaluation of dependence liability in various types of drugs in monkeys, Bull. Narc. 25:57.Google Scholar
  74. Yanagita, T., and Takahashi, S., 1973, Dependence liability of several sedative-hypnotic agents evaluated in monkeys, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 185:307.Google Scholar
  75. Yanagita, T., Ando, K., Takahashi, S., and Ishida, K., 1969, Self-administration of barbiturates, alcohol (intragastric) and CNS stimulants (intravenous) in monkeys, Bull. Comm. Prob. Drug Depend., 6039Google Scholar
  76. Yokel, R. A. and Pickens, R., 1974, Drug level of d-and l-amphetamine during intravenous self-administration, Psychopharmacologia 34:255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Young, A. M., and Woods, J. H., 1980, Behavior maintained by intravenous injection of codeine, cocaine, and etorphine in the rhesus macaque and the pigtail macaque, Psychopharmacology 70:263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Young, A. M., Herling, S., and Woods, J. H., 1981, History of drug exposure as a determinant of drug self-administration, in “Behavioral Pharmacology of Human Drug Dependence” (T. Thompson and C. E. Johanson, eds.), NIDA Research Monograph 37, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  79. Young, A. M., Swain, H. H., and Woods, J. H., 1981, Comparison of opioid agonists in maintaining responding and in suppressing morphine withdrawal in the rhesus monkey, Psychopharmacology 74:329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gail Winger
    • 1
  • Alice M. Young
    • 1
  • James H. Woods
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Pharmacology and PsychologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations