Comment: Response to “The Identity of the Child and the Right to Integration”

  • Lawrence B. Schiamberg
Part of the Child Nurturance book series (CHILDNUR, volume 1)

Abstract

I will begin this commentary by agreeing with Evans’ basic conclusion: “If this analysis is correct, it is up to many people working in many areas where the life of the child can be affected to invent and establish ways by which integration can be accomplished, because it is the child’s right and it should not be denied,” I will, however, qualify this broad agreement with two caveats. There are several points in Evans’ paper where we differ in our interpretation of child development and the child’s world. These differences will constitute the majority of my comments. Given my agreement with Evans’ general conclusion (and I think other social scientists would likely be similarly disposed), I think the essential problem is one of trying to do something feasible about the issue of personal disintegration. I am talking about practical issues of ends, means, and the “politics” of child development. Put another way, if we have a problem, what—if anything—can be done about it? (The concept of “progress” and its correct philosophical and historical status may well be involved here. However, that topic is the subject of a recent book and, perhaps, beyond the scope of Evans’ paper).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bronfenbrenner, U. The ecology of human development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  2. Coleman, J. S. Use: Transition to adulthood. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  3. Erickson, E. Childhood and society, 2nd Ed. New York: Norton, 1963.Google Scholar
  4. Erickson, E. Identity: Use and crisis. New York: Norton, 1968.Google Scholar
  5. Evans, J. Identity of the child and the right to integration. In A. Cafagna, R. Peterson and C. Staudenbaur (Eds.), Philosophy, children and the family. New York: Plenum, 1981.Google Scholar
  6. Schiamberg, L. A cybernetic-systems approach to human development. Cybernetica, 1977, 20, 43–55.Google Scholar
  7. Schiamberg, L., and Smith, K. U. Human development and human ecology: A systems perspective. New York: Macmillan, 1981 ( Forthcoming).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lawrence B. Schiamberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Family and Child EcologyMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations