Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Applied Optimization ((APOP,volume 5))

Abstract

An interior-point algorithm whose initial point is not restricted to a feasible point is called an infeasible-interior-point algorithm. The algorithm directly solves a given linear programming problem without using any artificial problem. So the algorithm has a big advantage of implementation over a feasible-interior-point algorithm, which has to start from a feasible point. We introduce a primal-dual infeasible-interior-point algorithm and prove global convergence of the algorithm. When all the data of the linear programming problem are integers, the algorithm terminates in polynomial-time under some moderate conditions of the initial point. We also introduce a predictor-corrector infeasible-interior-point algorithm, which achieves better complexity and has superlinearly convergence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. Freund, “An infeasible-start algorithm for linear programming whose complexity depends on the distance from the starting point to the optimal solution,” Working paper 3559–93-MSA, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  2. N. Karmarkar, “A new polynomial-time algorithm for linear programming,”Combinatorica 4 (1984) 373–395

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Kojima, N. Megiddo, and S. Mizuno, “A primal-dual infeasible-interior-point algorithm for linear programming,”Mathematical Programming 61 (1993) 261–280.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Kojima, S. Mizuno, and A. Yoshise, “A primal-dual interior point algorithm for linear programming,” in:Progress in Mathematical Programming, Interior- Point and Related Methods, ed. N. Megiddo ( Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989 ) 29–47.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Kojima, S. Mizuno, and A. Yoshise, “A polynomial-time algorithm for a class of linear complementary problems,”Mathematical Programming 44 (1989) 1–26.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. I. J. Lustig, “Feasibility issues in a primal-dual interior-point method for linear programming,”Mathematical Programming 49 (1990/91) 145–162.

    Google Scholar 

  7. I. J. Lustig, R. E. Marsten, and D. F. Shanno, “Computational experience with a primal-dual interior point method for linear programming,”Linear Algebra and Its Applications 152 (1991) 191–222.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. I. J. Lustig, R. E. Marsten, and D. F. Shanno, “Interior point methods: computational state of the art,”ORSA Journal on Computing 6 (1994) 1–14.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. R. Marsten, R. Subramanian, M. Saltzman, I. J. Lustig, and D. Shanno, “Interior point methods for linear programming: Just call Newton, Lagrange, and Fiacco and McCormick!,”Interfaces 20 (1990) 105–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. N. Megiddo, “Pathways to the optimal set in linear programming,” in:Progress in Mathematical Programming, Interior-Point and Related Methods, ed. N. Megiddo ( Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989 ) 131–158.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Mizuno, “Polynomiality of infeasible-interior-point algorithms for linear programming,”Mathematical Programming 67 (1994) 109–119.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. S.Mizuno,“A superlinearly convergent infeasible-interior-point algorithm for geometrical LCP’s without a strictly complementary condition,” Preprint 214, Mathematische Institute der Universitaet Wuerzburg, Germany (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Mizuno and F. Jarre, “An infeasible-interior-point algorithm using projections onto a convex set,” Preprint 209, Mathematische Institute der Universitaet Wuerzburg, Germany (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Mizuno, M. Kojima, and M. J. Todd, “Infeasible-interior-point primal-dual potential-reduction algorithms for linear programming,”SIAM Journal on Optimization 5 (1995) 52–67.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Mizuno, M. J. Todd, and Y. Ye, “On adaptive-step primal-dual interior- point algorithms for linear programming,”Mathematics of Operations Research 18 (1993) 964–981.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. S. Mizuno, M. J. Todd, and Y. Ye, “A surface of analytic centers and infeasible- interior-point algorithms for linear programming,”Mathematics of Operations Research 20 (1995) 52–67.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. R. D. C. Monteiro and I. Adler, “Interior path following primal-dual algorithms. Part I: linear programming,”Mathematical Programming 44 (1989) 27–41.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Muramatsu and T. Tsuchiya, “An affine scaling method with an infeasible starting point,” Research Memorandum 490, The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tokyo (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  19. F. A. Potra, “An infeasible interior-point predictor-corrector algorithm for linear programming,” Report No. 26, Department of Mathematics, The University of Iowa, USA (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  20. F. A. Potra, “A quadratically convergent predictor-corrector method for solving linear programs from infeasible starting points,”Mathematical Programming 67 (1994) 383–406.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. J. Stoer, “The complexity of an infeasible interior-point path-following method for the solution of linear programs,”Optimization Methods and Software 3 (1994) 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. K. Tanabe, “Centered Newton method for mathematical programming,” in:System Modeling and Optimization, eds. M. Iri and K. Yajima ( Springer-Verlag, New York, 1988 ) 197–206.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. K. Tanabe, “Centered Newton method for linear programming: Interior and ‘exterior’ point method’ (Japanese),” in:New Methods for Linear Programming 3, ed. K. Tone, ( The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tokyo, Japan, 1990 ) 98–100.

    Google Scholar 

  24. S. Wright, “An infeasible-interior-point algorithm for linear complementarity problems,”Mathematical Programming 67 (1994) 29–52.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Y. Ye, M. J. Todd, and S. Mizuno, “An O$$\[\left({\sqrt n L} \right)$$-iteration homogeneous and self-dual linear programming algorithm,”Mathematics of Operations Research 19 (1994) 53–67.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Y. Zhang, “On the convergence of a class of infeasible interior-point methods for the horizontal linear complementarity problem,”SIAM Journal on Optimization 4 (1994) 208–227.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Y. Zhang and D. Zhang, “Superlinear convergence of infeasible interior-point methods for linear programming,”Mathematical Programming 66 (1994) 361–378.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mizuno, S. (1996). Infeasible-Interior-Point Algorithms. In: Terlaky, T. (eds) Interior Point Methods of Mathematical Programming. Applied Optimization, vol 5. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3449-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3449-1_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-3451-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-3449-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics