Advertisement

An Application of Optimization to the Problem of Climate Change

  • J. A. Filar
  • P. S. Gaertner
  • M. A. Janssen
Part of the Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications book series (NOIA, volume 7)

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to demonstrate a methodology whereby reductions of greenhouse gas emissions can be allocated on a regional level with minimal deviation from the “business as usual emission scenario”. The methodology developed employs a two stage optimization process utilizing techniques of mathematical programming. The stage one process solves a world emission reduction problem producing an optimal emission reduction strategy for the world by maximizing an economic utility function. Stage two addresses a regional emission reduction allocation problem via the solution of an auxiliary optimization problem minimizing disruption from the above business as usual emission strategies. Our analysis demonstrates that optimal CO2 emission reduction strategies are very sensitive to the targets placed on CO2 concentrations, in every region of the world. It is hoped that the optimization analysis will help decision-makers narrow their debate to realistic environmental targets.

Keywords

Emission Reduction Usual Scenario Environmental Target Integrate Assessment Model Mixed Ocean Layer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Braddock, R.D., J.A. Filar, R. Zapert, M.G. den Elzen and J. Rotmans, “Mathematical Formulation of the IMAGE Greenhouse Effect Model”, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 1994, Vol. 18, pp. 234–254.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Brent, R.P ., “Algorithms for Minimization without Derivatives”, Prentice-Hall series in Automatic Computation, 1973.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Burden, R.L. and J.D. Faires, “Numerical Analysis”, fourth edition, PWS- KENT, 1989, pp. 251–257.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Economist Books, “The Economist Book of Vital World Statistics”, Introduction by R.J. Samuelson, Time Books, 1990, pp. 16–17.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Fletcher, R ., “Practical Methods of Optimization”, Vol. 1, Unconstrained Optimization, and Vol. 2, Constrained Optimization, John Wiley and Sons, 1980.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Foulds, L.R., “Optimization Techniques: An Introduction”, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1981.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Gill, P.E., W. Murray and M.H. Wright, “Practical Optimization”, Academic Press, London, 1981.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Hoel, M., “International Environmental Conventions: The case of uniform reductions of emissions”, Environmental and Resource Economics, 1992, Vol. 2, pp. 141–159.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Horst, R. and P.M. Pardalos (Editors), “Handbook of Global Optimization”, Nonconvex Optimization and Applications Vol. 2, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), “Climate Change: The IPCC Response Strategies”, Edited by J.T. Houghton, Island Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), “Climate Change: The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment”, Edited by J.T. Houghton, B.A. Callander and S.K. Varney, Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Janssen, M.A ., “Optimization of a Non-linear Dynamical System for Global Climate Change”, GLOBO working paper GWP 95–1, National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection, Bilthoven, The Netherlands, 1995.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Janssen, M.A., J. Rotmans and M.G.J, den Elzen, “The Biosphysics of Integrated Assessment Models for Global Climate Change: a comparative analysis”, paper prepared for the Energy Modelling Forum Working group meeting, Stanford University, USA, in prep, 1995.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Luenberger, D.G . (1984), “Introduction to Linear and Nonlinear Programming”, Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, CA, USA, 1984.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    MATLAB, “Optimization Toolbox: For use with MATLAB”, The Math Works Inc., 1992.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Nemhauser, G.L., A.H.G. Rinnooy, and M.J. Todd, “Optimization”, Elsevier Science Pub. Co., New York, 1989.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Nordhaus, W.D., “An Optimal Transition path for controlling Greenhouse Gases”, Science, 1992, vol 258, pp. 1315–1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Nordhaus, W.D., “Rolling the DICE: An Optimal Transition Path for Controlling Greenhouse Gases”, Resource and Energy Economics, 1993, Vol. 15, pp. 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Nordhaus, W.D., “Managing the Global Commons: The Economics of Climate Change”, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1994.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Press, W.H., B.P. Flannery, S.A. Teukolsky, and W.T. Vetterling, “Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing”, Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, 1988.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Ramsey, F.P ., “A Mathematical Theory of Saving”, The Economic Journal, Dec 1928, pp. 543–559.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Rotmans, J ., “IMAGE: An Integrated Model to Assess the Greenhouse Effect”, Ph.D. thesis, Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Tahvonen, O., H. von Storch and J. von Storch, “Economic Efficiency of C02 Reduction Programs”, Max-Planck-Institut fur Meteorolgie, Report No. 105, Hamburg, 1993.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Zapert, R ., “Uncertainty Analysis of Enhanced Greenhouse Effect Models”, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mathematics, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Maryland, USA, 1994.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. A. Filar
    • 1
  • P. S. Gaertner
    • 1
  • M. A. Janssen
    • 2
  1. 1.Environmental Modelling Research Group, Centre for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, School of MathematicsUniversity of South AustraliaThe LevelsAustralia
  2. 2.Global Dynamics and Sustainable Development, RIVM, and Department of MathematicsUniversity of LimburgMaastrichtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations