Educating Professionals for Social Systems Intervention

A 10-Year Retrospective
  • Louis G. Tornatzky

Abstract

Twice in the past decade, I have put on paper my observations on the development of a novel Ph.D. training program, one that has been explicitly oriented toward social change and community research. These earlier thoughts encompassed, respectively, the initiation and ideological-conceptual underpinnings of the program (Tornatzky, Fairweather, & O’Kelly, 1970), and some of its adolescent crises and growing pains (Tornatzky, 1976). Now, after 9 1/2 years of association with the Ecological Psychology Program of Michigan State University, I once again feel compelled to share participant-observation data, and advice, on how to create and run such programs.

Keywords

Mold Hull Stake Alloca Vinced 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albee, G. W. Does including psychotherapy in health insurance represent a subsidy to the rich from the poor? American Psychologist, 1977, 32, 719–721.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arutunian, C., Kroll, J., & Murphy, S. Source book of programs: community mental health centers. Palo Alto, Calif.: American Institutes for Research, 1976.Google Scholar
  3. Atkinson, R. C. Reflections on psychology’s past and concerns about its future. American Psychologist, 1977, 32, 205–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. Principles of behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1969.Google Scholar
  5. Boruch, R., McSweeney, A. J., & Soderstrom, E. J. Randomized field experiments for program development and evaluation: An illustrative bibliography (Revised). Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, 1977.Google Scholar
  6. Brookover, W. B. Schools can make a difference. East Lansing: College of Urban Development, Michigan State University, 1977.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966.Google Scholar
  8. Fairweather, G. W. (Ed.). Social psychology in treating mental illness: An experimental approach. New York: Wiley, 1964.Google Scholar
  9. Fairweather, G. W. Methods for experimental social innovation. New York: Wiley, 1967.Google Scholar
  10. Fairweather, G. W., & Tornatzky, L. G. Experimental methods for social policy research. New York: Pergamon Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  11. Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development. Educational programs that work. San Francisco: Author, 1975.Google Scholar
  12. Galbraith, J. Designing complex organizations. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1973.Google Scholar
  13. Goodstein, L. D., & Sandier, I. Using psychology to promote human welfare. American Psychologist, 1978, 33, 882–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gross, S. J. The myth of professional licensing. American Psychologist, 1978, 33, 1009–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Helmreich, R. Applied social psychology: The unfulfilled promise. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1975, 1(4), 548–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hess, H. F. Entry requirements for professional practice of psychology. American Psychologist, 1977, 32, 365–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huse, E. Organization development and change. St. Paul, Minn.: West, 1975.Google Scholar
  18. Kuhn, T. S. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.Google Scholar
  19. Litwak, E. Models of bureaucracy that permit conflict. American Journal of Sociology, 1961, 57, 173–183.Google Scholar
  20. Lounsbury, J. W. Personal communication, 1979.Google Scholar
  21. Lounsbury, J. W., Cook, M. P., Leader, D. S., Robeitz, G., & Meares, E. P. Comment. Community psychology: Boundary problems, psychological perspectives, and an empirical overview of the field. American Psychologist, 1979, 34, 554–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rogers, E., & Shoemaker, F. Communication of innovations. New York: Free Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  23. Rossi, P., & Williams, W. Evaluating social programs. New York: Seminar Press, 1972Google Scholar
  24. Rossi, P., Freeman, H., & Wright, S. Program evaluation: A systematic approach. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1979.Google Scholar
  25. Solmon, L. C. Attracting women to psychology. American Psychologist, 1978, 33, 990–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Struening, E. L., & Guttentag, M. (Eds.). Handbook of evaluation research (2 vols.). Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1975.Google Scholar
  27. Thompson, J. D. Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.Google Scholar
  28. Tornatzky, L. G. How a Ph.D. program aimed at survival issues survived. American Psychologist, 1976, 31, 189–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tornatzky, L. G. The triple threat evaluator. Evaluation and Program Planning, 1979, 2, 111–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tornatzky, L. G., Fairweather, G. W., & O’Kelly, L. I. A Ph.D. program aimed at survival. American Psychologist, 1970, 25, 884–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tornatzky, L. G., Brookover, W. B., Hathaway, D. V., Miller, S. K., & Passalacqua, J. Changing school climate: A case study in implementation. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Urban and Metropolitan Studies, Michigan State University, 1979.Google Scholar
  32. Tornatzky, L. G., Fergus, E., Avellar, J., Fairweather, G. W., & Fleischer, M. Innovation and social process: A national experiment in implementing social technology. Elmsford, N.Y.: Pergamon Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  33. Vallance, T. The professional nonpsychology graduate program for psychologists. American Psychologist, 1976, 31, 193–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Weiss, C. (Ed.). Evaluating action programs: Readings in social action and education. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1972.Google Scholar
  35. Wertheimer, M, Barclay, A. G., Cook, S. W., Kiesler, C. A., Koch, S., Reigel, K. F., Rorer, L. G., Senders, V. L., Smith, M. B., & Sperling, S. E. Psychology and the future. American Psychologist, 1978, 33, 631–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wilner, D., Greathouse, V., Wilton, R., Ershoff, D., Foster, K., & Hetherington, R. Inside DOPE: The custom research databank in the analysis and transfer of information. Evaluation, 1976, 3(l-2), 11–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Yin, R. Changing urban bureaucracies: How new practices become routinized. Santa Monica, Calif.: Rand Corporation, 1978.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Louis G. Tornatzky
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Policy Research and AnalysisNational Science FoundationWashington, D.C.USA

Personalised recommendations