On the Accuracy of Satellite-Observed Sea Surface Temperatures

  • S. Tabata
Part of the Marine Science book series (MR, volume 13)

Abstract

A comparison between shipborne observations and sea surface temperatures measured by the satellites (NOAA-3, NOAA-4, NOAA-5, NOAA-6 and TIROS-N) off the Pacific coast of Canada indicates that in each case a linear regression is sufficient to relate the two sets of data. The standard error of estimate for the temperatures observed by the above satellites were: ±0.5°C, ±0.6°C, ±0.3 – ±0.4°C, ±0.6°C and ±0.5°C, respectively. When reliable ground truth data is available, sea surface temperatures in a limited region and time can be measured by the satellites to the above accuracy using this “field-calibration” method. Estimates of errors as large as ±2°C reported in literature are suspected to be mainly due to errors in shipborne measurements, failure to correct adequately for atmospheric effects, and uncertainty in the radiometer calibration. Eventually, these errors are likely to be reduced considerably but there still remains a problem of the proper interpretation of satellite-determined sea surface temperatures in the presence of marine haze, thin clouds and light mist. Until these problems are resolved the method of applying field-calibrations appears to be the only practical way of obtaining reliable estimates of sea surface temperatures in a given region.

Keywords

Dioxide Chrome Attenuation Ozone Cali 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brower, R.L., Gohrband, H.S., Pichel, W.G., Signore, T.S., Walton, C.C., 1976, “Satellite Derived Sea Surface Temperatures From NOAA Spacecraft,” NOAA Technical Memorandum NESS 78, 74 pp., National Environmental Satellite Service, NOAA, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, S.R., 1975, SST Quarterly Report, April–June. Unpublished manuscript report, NOAA/NESS, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, D.C., 2 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Hunolt, G.W., 1977, “VHRR Digital Tape Users Guide,” Unpubl. manuscript, 23 pp., National Climatic Center, Satellite Data Services Branch, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  4. Koffler, R., 1976, “Digital Processing of NOAA’s Very High Resolution Radiometer (VHRR) Data,” International Astronautical Federation 27th Congress, Ref. No. 76–209, 7 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Maul, G.A. and Sidran, M., 1973, “Atmospheric Effects on Ocean Surface Temperature Sensing From the NOAA Satellite Scanning Radiometer,” J. Geophys. Res., 78., 1909–1916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Rao, P.K., Smith, W.L. and Koffler, R., 1972, “Global Sea Surface Temperature Distribution Determined From an Environmental Satellite,” Monthly Weather Review, 100, 10–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Schwalb, A., 1978, “The TIROS-N/NOAA A–G Satellite Series,” NOAA Technical Memorandum NESS 95, 75 pp., National Environmental Satellite Service, NOAA, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  8. Tabata, S., 1978, “Comparison of Observations of Sea Surface Temperatures at Ocean Station P and NOAA Buoy Stations and Those Made by Merchant Ships Travelling in Their Vicinities, in the Northeast Pacific Ocean,” J. Appl. Meteorol., 17, 374–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Tabata, S. and Gower, J.F.R., 1980, “A Comparison of Ship and Satellite Measurements of Sea Surface Temperatures off the Pacific Coast of Canada,” J. Geophys. Res., 85, 6636–6648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Tabata
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Ocean SciencesSidneyCanada

Personalised recommendations