Experimental Designs for the Distribution-Free Analysis of Enzyme Kinetic Data

  • Ronald G. Duggleby


The statistical analysis of experimental data always involves making certain assumptions about the distribution of experimental errors. Methods based on the least-squares principle are appropriate when these errors follow a normal distribution but several studies have shown that, for enzyme kinetic measurements, such a distribution may not be common. Under these circumstances, distribution-free methods of analysis should be employed. In this paper a distribution-free method, which can be applied to a wide variety of data analysis problems, is proposed. The method is based on a special type of experimental design in which replicate measurements are made under as many experimental conditions as there are parameters to be estimated. This design offers great simplicity in the execution of the experiment and in the analysis of the results. In addition, the design can be made optimal in the sense that the overall variance of the parameter estimates is minimized. Formulae are given for choosing the optimal designs for selected cases and a worked example of the design and analysis of a competitive inhibition experiment is presented.


Design Point Simultaneous Equation Error Structure Great Simplicity Meaningful Standard Error 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Reich, J.G. (1970) FEBS Lett. 9, 245–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dowd, J.E. and Riggs, D.S. (1965) J. Biol. Chem. 240, 863–869.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wilkinson, G.N. (1961) Biochem. J. 80, 324–332.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cleland, W.W. (1967) Adv. Enzymol. 29, 1–32.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Storer, A.C., Darlison, M.G. and Cornish-Bowden, A. (1975) Biochem. J. 151, 361–367.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Askelöf, P., Korsfeldt, M. and Mannervik, B. (1976) Eur. J. Biochem. 69, 61–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cornish-Bowden, A. and Eisenthal, R. (1974) Biochem. J. 139, 721–730.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nimmo, I.A. and Mabood, S.F. (1979) Anal. Biochem. 94, 265–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eisenthal, R. and Cornish-Bowden, A. (1974) Biochem. J. 139, 715–720.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Porter, W.R. and Trager, W.F. (1977) Biochem. J. 161, 293–302.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cornish-Bowden, A., Porter, W.R. and Trager, W.F. (1978) J. Theor. Biol. 74, 163–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Box, G.E.P. and Lucas, H.L. (1959) Biometrika, 46, 77–90.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bartfai, T. and Mannervik, B. (1972) FEBS Lett. 26, 252–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Markus, M. and Plesser, T. (1976) Biochem. Soc. Trans. 4, 361–364.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kanyar, B. (1978) Acta Biochim. Biophys. Acad. Sei. Hung. 13, 153–160.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Endrenyi, L. (1980) In “Kinetic Data Analysis: Design and Analysis of Enzyme and Pharmacokinetic Experiments” (L. Endrenyi, ed.), pp. 137–167, Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cleland, W.W. (1975) Accounts Chem. Res. 8, 145–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Duggleby, R.G. (1979) J. Theor. Biol. 81, 671–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald G. Duggleby
    • 1
  1. 1.John Curtin School of Medical Research Department of BiochemistryAustralian National UniversityCanberra, ACTAustralia

Personalised recommendations