Abstract
Let L be an orthomodular lattice (OML). It is well-known that there is no operation → definable in terms of lattice operations such that → satisfies most of the desirable conditions for a non-modal implication.5 Some authors have come to the conclusion that perhaps the implication in quantum logic must be treated as the relation ≤ in L.4
This paper has been written under a contract of the first two authors and the Republic Fund for Scientific Work of Serbia.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
A.R. Anderson and N.D. Belnap Jr., “Entailment: the Logic of Relevance and Necessity, Vol. I”, Princeton University Press (1975).
G.N. Georgacarakos, Orthomodularity and Relevance, J. Philos. Logic 8 (1979), pp. 415–432.
G. Gratzer, “Universal Algebra”, Van Nostrand (1968).
R.J. Greechie and S.P. Gudder, Quantum logics, “Research in the Foundations and Philosophy of Quantum Theory”, C.A. Hooker ed. Reidei, Dordrecht (1974).
G.M. Hardegree, The conditional in abstract and concrete quantum logic, in “Logico-Algebraic Approach to Quantum Mechanics, Vol. II”, C.A. Hooker ed.. Reidei, Dordrecht (1979), pp. 49–108.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1981 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kron, A., Maric, Z., Vujosevic, S. (1981). Entailment and Quantum Logic. In: Beltrametti, E.G., van Fraassen, B.C. (eds) Current Issues in Quantum Logic. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3228-2_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3228-2_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-3230-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-3228-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive