Mass Trapping for Detection, Suppression and Integration with other Suppression Measures Against the Boll Weevil
The male boll weevil, Anthonomus grandis Boheman, after feeding on cotton plants, emits an airborne pheromone which attracts both sexes of emerged overwintered adults prior to squaring of cotton plants. Cross et al. (1969) reported that male-baited sticky wing traps attracted female boll weevils. Hardee et al. (1969), in concurrent tests, observed that both male and female boll weevils responded to male-baited traps in the spring and in the fall. However, relatively few boll weevils responded to traps around cotton fields during the fruiting period from late June until late August. Mitchell and Hardee (1974) found that pheromone-baited traps placed in cotton fields during mid-season captured females primarily. Thus, the pheromone appears to serve as an aggregating attractant for both sexes of overwintered boll weevils and as a mating attractant for females seeking mates in cotton fields.
KeywordsTrap Density Cotton Field Boll Weevil Mass Trapping Female Capture
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Cross, W. H., Hardee, D. D., Nichols, F., Mitchell, H. C., Mitchell, E. B., Huddleston, P. M., and Tumlinson, J. H., 1969, Attraction of female boll weevils to traps baited with males or extracts of males, J. Econ. Entomol., 62: 154.Google Scholar
- Cross, W. H., Mitchell, H. C., and Hardee, D. D., 1976, Boll weevils: Response to light sources and colors on traps, Environ. Entomol., 3: 565.Google Scholar
- Hardee, D. D., Cross, W. H., Mitchell, E. B., Huddleston, P. M., Mitchell, H. C., Merkl, M. E., and Davich, T. B., 1969, Biological factors influencing responses of the female boll weevil to the male sex pheromone in field and large-cage tests, J. Econ. Entomol., 62: 161.Google Scholar
- Hardee, D. D., McKibben, G. H., Gueldner, R. C., Mitchell, E. B.Google Scholar
- Tumlinson, J. H., and Cross, W. H., 1972, Boll weevils in nature respond to grandlure, a synthetic pheromone, J. Econ. Entomol., 65: 97.Google Scholar
- Knipling, E. F., 1976, Biomathematical basis for suppression and elimination of boll weevil populations, Proceedings of a Conference on Boll Weevil Suppression, Management and Elimination Technology, Feb. 13–15, Memphis, TN, USDA Tech. Bull. ARS-S-71.Google Scholar
- Knipling, E. F., 1979, The basic principles of insect population suppression and management, USDA Handbook No. 512, 623 pp.Google Scholar
- Knipling, E. F., and McGuire, J. U., Jr., 1966, Population models to test theoretical effects of sex attractants used for insect control, USDA Inform. Bull. 308, 20 pp.Google Scholar
- Leggett, J. E., and Cross, W. H., 1971, A new trap for recapturing boll weevils, USDA Coop. Econ. Insect Rept., 21: 773.Google Scholar
- McKibben, G. H., Davich, T. B., Gueldner, R. C., Hardee, D. D., and Huddleston, P. M., 1974, Polymeric compositions for attracting cotton boll weevils, U. S. Patent No. 3,803, 303.Google Scholar
- Mitchell, E. B., and Hardee, D. D., 1974, Infield traps: A new concept in survey and suppression of low populations of boll weevils, J. Econ. Entomol., 67: 506.Google Scholar