Advertisement

Thermoviscoelastic Interaction Effects in Filled Polymers

  • W. L. Hufferd
  • E. C. Francis

Abstract

Experimental data indicate that stress response predictions based on the normal assumption of thermorheologically simple material behavior can underpredict observed stress response by a factor of two or more when applied to combined thermal and mechanical load histories. In highly filled polymeric systems, such as solid propellants, combined thermal and mechanical synergistic effects induce high local stress gradients in the polymer binder between filler particles that are not accounted for in conventional analysis methods. An experimental and analytical methodology is demonstrated which accounts for these interaction effects and is applied to slow thermal-mechanical loading of a solid propellant rocket motor.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Morland, L.W. and Lee, E.H., “Stress Analysis for Linear Viscoelastic Materials with Temperature Variation”, Trans. Soc. Rheology, Vol. 4, pp. 233–263, 1960.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bornstein, G.A., “Transient Thermoviscoelastic Analysis of A Uniaxial Bar”, Bulletin of the 7th JANNAF Mechanical Behavior Working Group Meeting, CPIA Publ. No. 17 7, pp. 23, 1968.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Martin, D.L., “An Approximate Method of Analysis of NonLinear Transient Thermoviscoelastic Behavior”, Bulletin of the 8th JANNAF Mechanical Behavior Working Group Meeting, CPIA Publ. No. 193, Vol. 1, pp. 45–52, 1969Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leeming, H., et. al., “Solid Propellant Structural Test Vehicle and Systems Analysis”, AFRPL TR-70-10, March 1970.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lee, T.Y., Coupled Thermomechanical Effects in High Solids Propellant, AIAA Journal, Vol. 17, pp. 1015–1017, 1979CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schapery, R.A., “A Theory of Nonlinear Thermoviscoelasticity Based on Irreversible Thermodynamics”, Proc. 5th U.S. Nat’l. Congress Appl. Mech., pp. 511–530, 1966.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hufferd, W.L. and Fitzgerald, J.E., (Editors), JANNAF Solid Propellant Structural Integrity Handbook, CPIA Publication No. 230, September 1972.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Francis, E.C., et. al., “Predictive Techniques for Failure Mechanisms in Solid Rocket Motors”, AFRPL TR-79-87, January 1980.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Francis, E.C. and Thompson “Solid Propellant Stress Transducer Evaluation”, 24th Industrial Instrumentation Symposium, Instrument Society of America, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 1978,Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Francis, E.C. and Chelner, H. “Improved Stress Transducer Design and Stability Evaluation” 10th Transducer Workshop, Sponsored by Transducer Committee of the Telemetry Group Reporting to Range Commander Council, U.S. Air Force Academy, Colorado Springs, Colorady, June 1979.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Francis, E.C., Thompson, R.E. and Briggs, W.E., “The Development of Improved Normal Stress Transducer for Propellant Grains”, AFRPL-TR-79-34, June 1979Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. L. Hufferd
    • 1
  • E. C. Francis
    • 2
  1. 1.University of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA
  2. 2.Chemical Systems DivisionUnited Technologies CorporationSunnyvaleUSA

Personalised recommendations