The Representative-Vector Method for Calculating Operator-Moments

  • S. D. Bloom
  • R. F. HausmanJr.

Abstract

The utility of operator-moments or traces in the various applications of spectral-distribution theory is well-documented in the literature1–6 as well as being the subject of a good many of the papers at this conference. From these references, past and current, it is clear that to take full advantage of the powerful entrée that spectral distribution theory offers in nuclear physics, at least, it may be generally necessary to have many moments beyond the first two Hamiltonian moments ‹H› and ‹H2›. In order to calculate, for one example, level densities reliably in the excitation-energy regions of physical interest it is now known that it may be necessary to have the moments ‹J z 2 Hn› and of course ‹Hn› with n ranging as high as 8 or so.6 The subject of this paper is a new method for obtaining these higher moments which is based on the use of random multi-particle vectors, which we call random representative vectors (RRV), in conjunction with an appropriate shell-model space and Hamiltonian. With this method it is possible to calculate average properties of very large spaces with well-defined symmetries by averaging the results over a relatively few RRV’s.

Keywords

Suffix 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    S. A. Moszkowski, Prog. Theo. Phys. 28, 1 (1962).ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. B. French, Phys. Lett. 23, 245 (1966)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. B. French and K. F. Ratcliffe, Phys. Rev. C3, 94 (1971).ADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. N. Ginocchio, Phys. Rev. C8, 135 (1973).ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. P. Draayer, J. B. French, and S. S. M. Wong, Annals of Phys. NY 106, 472 (1977); 106, 503 (1977). See these articles for a list of earlier references.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. M. Grimes, S. D. Bloom, R. F. Hausman, Jr., and B. J. Dalton, Phys. Rev. C19, 2378 (1979). See this article for later ref¬erences.ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. F. Hausman, Jr., C. F. Bender, and S. D. Bloom, Chem. Phys. Letters 32, 483 (1975); R. F. Hausman, Jr., UCRL-52178, Nov. 1976, unpublished.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R.R. Whitehead and A. Watt, Jour. Phys. G: Nucl. Phys. 2 L19 1976; R.R. Whitehead, A Watt, B.J. Cole and J. Morrison, “Advances in Nuclear Physics”,11 Editors: M. Bar anger and E. Vogt, (Plenum N.Y. 1977 ), Vol. 9, p. 123.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    W.Chung and B.H. Wildenthal, unpublished; W. Chung; thesis, Michigan State University 1976, unpublished.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    F. Petrovich, H. McManus, V. A. Madsen, and J. Atkinson, Phys. Rev. Letts. 22, 395 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Kallio and K. IColtveit, Nucl. Phys. 53, 37 (1964).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. D. Bloom
    • 1
  • R. F. HausmanJr.
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Lawrence Livermore Laboratory and Department of Applied ScienceUniversity of California at LivermoreUSA
  2. 2.Los Alamos Scientific LaboratoryLos AlamosUSA

Personalised recommendations