The Meiobenthos of Fjords: A Review and Prospectus

  • Brian Michael Marcotte
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 4)


The marine meiobenthos is a diverse assemblage of small (0.5 – 0.1 mm) metazoans living on and in the bottom of the sea. It includes most invertebrate phyla, especially nematodes and copepod crustaceans. Although meiofauna are ubiquitous, abundant and productive members of benthic ecosystems, their ecology in deep-water fjords is little studied. The present report will review the ecology of meiofauna of fjords in the context of meiobenthic ecology in general. A prospectus for meiofauna research in fjords will complete this report.


Chum Salmon Bornholm Basin Respiratory Pigment Invertebrate Phyla Genital Somite 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Boaden, P. J. S. 1975: Anaerobiosis, meiofauna and early metazoan evolution. Zool Scripta. 4(1), 21–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bruun, A. 1949: The use of nematodes as food for larval fish. J. du Consell. 16, 96–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Coull, B. C. 1968: Shallow water meiobenthos of the Bermuda platform. Ph.D. Thesis, Lehigh University. 189 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Coull, B. C. 1973: Estuarine meiofauna: a review: trophic relationships and microbial interactions. In Stevenson, L. H. and R. R. Colwell (Ed.) Estuarine Microbial Ecology. Univ. South Carolina Press: 499–512.Google Scholar
  5. Elmgren, R. 1976: Structure and dynamics of Baltic benthos communities, with particular reference to the relationship between macro- and meiofauna. 5th Symposium of the Baltic Marine Biologists, Kiel. 43 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Fenchel, T. 1969: Ecology of the Marine microbenthos I. The quantitative importance of ciliates as compared with metazoans in various types of sediments. Ophelia 4, 121–137.Google Scholar
  7. Fenchel, T. 1974: Intrinsic rate of natural increase: the relationship with body size. Oecologla 14, 317–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fenchel, T. and R. J. Riedl 1970: The sulfide system: a new biotic community underneath the oxidized layer of marine sand bottoms. Mar. Biol. 7(3). 255–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gerlach, S. A. 1971: On the importance of marine meiofauna for benthos communities. Oecologla 6, 176–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guille, A. and J. Soyer 1968: La fauna benthique des substrates meubles de Banyuls-sur-Mer. Premiers données qualitatives et quantitatives. Vie Milieu 19, 323–360.Google Scholar
  11. Kaczynski, V. W., R. J. Feller and J. Clayton 1973: Trophic analysis of juvenile pink and chum salmon (Oncorkynchus gorbuscha and O. keta) in Puget Sound. J. Fish. Res. Board. Can. 30, 1003–1008.Google Scholar
  12. Leppäkoski, E. 1969: Transitory return of the benthic fauna of the Bornholm Basin, after extermination by oxygen insufficiency. Cah. Biol. Mar. 10, 163–172.Google Scholar
  13. Mclntyre, A. D. 1968: Ecology of marine meiobenthos. Biol. Rev. 44, 245–290.Google Scholar
  14. Odum, H. T. 1974: Combining energy laws and corollaries of the maximum power principle with visual systems mathematics. In. Levin, S. A. (Ed.) Ecosystem Analysis and Prediction. SIAM-SIMS Alta, Utah. 239–263.Google Scholar
  15. Sars, C. 0. 1903–1919: An Account of the Crustacea of Norway. Bergen.Google Scholar
  16. Slobodkin, L. B. and H. L. Sanders 1969: On the contribution of environmental predictability to species diversity. In Woodwell, G. M. and H. H. Smith (Ed.) Diversity and Stability in Ecological Systems. Brookhaven Nat. Lab., 82–95.Google Scholar
  17. Smith, K. L. 1973: Respiration of a sublittoral Community. Ecology 54(5), 1065–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Teal, J. and W. Wieser 1966: The distribution and ecology of nematodes in a Georgia salt marsh. Limnol. Oceanogr. 11, 217–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Thiel, H. 1972: Die Beduntung der Meiofauna in Küstenfernen benthisehen Lebensgemeinschaften verschiedener geographischer Regionen. Verhand. Deutsch. Zool. Ges. 65 37–42.Google Scholar
  20. Thiel, H. 1975: The size structure of the deep sea benthos. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. 60(5). 574–606.Google Scholar
  21. Wigley, R. L. and A. D. McIntyre 1964: Some quantitative comparisons of offshore meiobenthos and macrobenthos south of Martha’s Vineyard. Limnol. Oceanogr. 9, 485–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian Michael Marcotte
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of VictoriaVictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations