Jets in Leptoproduction from QCD

  • P. Binétruy
  • G. Girardi
Part of the Ettore Majorana International Science Series book series (EMISS, volume 5)

Abstract

If quarks and gluons are confined, the best way to “see” them is to study the jets of particles. However, while the domain of perturbative QCD has greatly expanded for the last few years, the precision of its predictions has certainly suffered from our lack of methods to handle the non-perturbative features of the theory. In the following, we shall study what perturbative QCD can predict, and also what it cannot. So far, the rule of the game is to find tricks which eliminate non-perturbative effects as much as possible.

Keywords

Derrick 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    T. Kinoshita, J. Math Phys. 3: 650 (1962); T.D. Lee and M. Nauenberg, Phys. Rev. 133:B 1549 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J.D. Bjorken and S.J. Brodsky, Phys. Rev. D1: 1416 (1970).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. Georgi and M. Machacek, Phys. Rev. Letters 39: 1237 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Farhi, Phys. Rev. Letters 39: 1587 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    K.H. Streng, T.F. Walsh and P.M. Zerwas, DESY 79/10 (february 1979 ).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    P.M. Stevenson, Nucl. Phys. B150: 357 (1979) and preprint ICTP/78-79/16 (April 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. de Rújula, J. Ellis, E.G. Floratos and M.K. Gaillard, Nucl. Phys. B138: 387 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. Sterman and S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Letters 39: 1436 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. Binétruy and G. Girardi, Phys. Letters 83B: 382 (1979).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. Binétruy and G. Girardi, Nucl. Phys. B155: 150 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ranft and Ranft, Leipzig University preprint 78–15 (1978).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aachen-Bonn-CERN-London I.C.-Oxford-Saclay Collaboration CERN/EP 79-39 Rev. (1979); M. Derrick., Preprint ANL-HEP-PR-79-17 (1979).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Vayaki., Aachen-Bonn-CERN-London-Oxford-Saclay Collaboration, CERN/EP/PHYS 78-28 (1978). Note that in Fig. 5c of this paper, the correct scale is (1/σ)(dσ /dT)x 10 and not (1/ σ)(dσ /dT) x 102.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A.J. Buras and K.J. F. Gaemers, Nucl. Phys. B132: 249 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. Georgi and H. D. Politzer, Phys. Rev. Letters 40: 3 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    R.N. Cahn, Phys. Lett.. 78B: 269 (1978).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Méndez, Nucl. Phys. B145: 199 (1978); A. Méndez, A. Raychaudhuri and V.J. Stenger, Nucl. Phys. B148: 499 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. Cleymans, Phys. Rev. D18: 954 (1978).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    G. Köpp, R. Maciejko and P.M. Zerwas, Nucl. Phys. B144: 123 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    P. Mazzanti, R. Odorico and V. Roberto, Preprint IFUB/78-11Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Binétruy
    • 1
  • G. Girardi
    • 1
  1. 1.LAPPAnnecy-le-VieuxFrance

Personalised recommendations