Skip to main content

Developments in the Right to Treatment

  • Chapter

Abstract

In the space allotted to me, I will discuss briefly the interesting and significant developments in the legal right to treatment or habilitation for mentally disabled persons, beginning with the Wyatt decision in 1971 and continuing to the present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. F. Supp. 781 (M.D. Ala. 1971), 334 F. Supp. 1341 (M.D. Ala. 1971), 344 F. Supp. 373 and 387 (M.D. Ala. 1972), affirmed sub nom Wyatt v. Aderholt, 503 F. 2d 1305 (5th Cir. 1974 ).

    Google Scholar 

  2. New York State Association for Retarded Children v. Rockefeller, 357 F. Supp. 752 (E.D.N.Y. 1973 ).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dixon v. Weinberger, 405 F. Supp. 974 (D.D.C. 1975 ).

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. Supp. 1295 (E.D. Pa. 1977); affirmed in part and modified in part, Nos. 78–1490, 1564, and 1602 (3rd Cir., December 13, 1979 ). The court of appeals’ decision, handed down after this article was written, affirmed the basic thrust of the district court decision on statutory grounds, while modifying that decision with respect to the complete closing of Pennhurst. While recognizing that the Developmentally Disabled Assistance and Bill of Rights Act provides mentally retarded persons with a right to the least restrictive environment and that deinstitutionalization is the “clear preference of the Act,” the appeals court held that in specific situations, “institutionalization might be appropriate once adequate habilitation and living conditions are established.”

    Google Scholar 

  5. Since this article was written, the court has denied defendants’ motion for modification. Wyatt v. Ireland, No. 3195-N (M.D. Ala., October 24, 1979 ).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Friedman, P.R. (1980). Developments in the Right to Treatment. In: Milunsky, A., Annas, G.J. (eds) Genetics and the Law II. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3078-3_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3078-3_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-3080-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-3078-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics