Orientation and Alignment in Scattering Processes from Laser-Excited Atoms

  • H. W. Hermann
  • I. V. Hertel

Abstract

We discuss qualitative differences observed in collisions of optically pumped Na(3P) atoms with electrons and diatomic molecules. Varying the scattering geometry and the polarization of the pumping laser prepares well-defined spatial configurations of the colliding Na and allows measurement of details on the ratios and relative phases of the partial transition amplitudes. We compare the electron-collision-induced transitions P → S (I), P → D in Na (II), and the quenching of Na(3P) by diatomic molecules (III). The three cases exhibit remarkably different responses to orientation (circular) and alignment (linear polarized pumping light) of the Na: I and II depend strongly on the orientation, III not measurably. In contrast, in cases I and III the alignment is strong, while for case II it is weak. Process I is well described by scattering calculations. For cases II and III we present qualitative models to interpret the experimental observations.

Keywords

Anisotropy Coherence LIme Eter Verse 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    U. Fano and J. H. Macek, Rev. Mod. Phys. 45, 533 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    I. V. Hertel and W. Stoll in Adv. At. Mol. Phys. 13, 162 (1978).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Eminyan, K. B. McAdam, J. Slevin, and H. Kleinpoppen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 576 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    W. Wittmann and H. J. Andra, Z. Physik A288, 335 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    I. V. Hertel and W. Stoll, J. Phys. B 7, 570–593 (1974).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    U. Fano, Chapter 18 of this volume.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. W. Hermann, I. V. Hertel, W. Reiland, A. Stamatović, and W. Stoll, J. Phys. B 10, 251 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. W. Hermann, I. V. Hertel, and M. H. Kelley, J. Phys. B, to be published.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. L. Moores, and D. W. Norcross, J. Phys. B 5, 1482 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. V. Kennedy, V. P. Myerscough, and M. R. C. McDowell, J. Phys. B 10, 357 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    U. Fano and M. Kohmoto, private communication.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    I. V. Hertel, in The Excited State in Chemical Physics II, J. Wm. McGowan, ed., Advances in Chemical Physics, J. Wiley and Sons, New York, 1980.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    I. V. Hertel, H. Hofmann, and K. A. Rost, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 343 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. Botschwina, W. Meyer, and I. V. Hertel, to be published.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    P. Habitz, to be published.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. W. Hermann
    • 1
  • I. V. Hertel
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Sonderforschungsbereich 91Universität KaiserslauternGermany
  2. 2.Institüt für MolekülphysikFreie Universität BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations