Skip to main content

Failure Analyses of Surgical Implants from the Human Body Can Improve Product and Performance Reliability

  • Chapter

Abstract

A relatively high measure of success is experienced today in the use of metal implants in the body. This success can be attributed to advanced metallurgical technology coupled with improved medical and surgical techniques. Ludwigson [1,2] has followed the history of metal implants and assigned several development periods: ancient times to 1875 when pure metals, copper, silver, and gold were used; from 1875 to 1925 when surgery and implantation became more successful; and finally the relatively current period from 1925 when more satisfactory results have been experienced with metals and alloys appropriately developed for such service. There are approximately 2,000,000 metal implants used in the United States today if we consider each pin and screw separately. The number of hip implants, the major joint replacement, is 50,000 per year in the United States alone [3].

Research sponsored by Union Carbide Corporation under contract with Energy Research and Development Administration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ludwigson, D.C., “Today’s Prosthetic”, J. Metals, Vol. 16, pp. 226–231 (March 1964).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ludwigson, D.C., “Requirements for Metallic Surgical Implants and Prosthetic Devices”, Metals Quarterly (Amer. Soc. Met.), pp. 1–6 (August 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fraker, Anna C., Ruff, A.W., “Metallic Surgical Implants: State of the Art”, J. of Metals, pp. 22–28 (May 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  4. White, William E., Le May, lain, “Optical and Electron Fractographic Studies of Fracture in Orthopaedic Implants”, Microstructural Science, Vol. 3, Part B, (New York, NY: American Elsevier Publishing Co.), pp. 911–930 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hulbert, S.F., Cooke, F.W., Klawitter, J.J.: “Investigation Into the Potential of Ceramic Materials as Permanently Implantable Skeletal Prostheses”, Biomaterials, Bioengineering Applied to Materials for Hard and Soft Tissue Replacement, ed. A. L. Bement, Battelle Seattle Research Center, Seattle, Washington, (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Laing, P.G., “Available Metals”, Metal and Engineering in Bone and Joint Surgery, ( Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins Co. ) (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stewart, D., Tullock, D.S., Principles of Corrosion and Protection — A Monograph, (London: MacMillan & Co.).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gray, R.J., Metallographic Examination of Retrieved Intramedullary Bone Pins and Bone Screws from the Human Body, J. Biomed, Water, Res. Symposium No. 5 (Part 1), John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (New York, NY), pp. 27–38 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gray, R.J., Zirkle, Lewis G. Jr., “Metallographic Examination of a Failed Jewett Nail-plate from a Human Femur”, Microstructural Science, Volume 4, ed., E.W. Filer, J.M. Hoegfeldt and James McCall, American Elsevier Publishing Co., Inc., pp. 179–189, New York, NY (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ferguson, Albert B., “Metal Behavior, The Corrosion Process”, Metals and Engineering in Bone and Joint Surgery, ed. Charles O. Bechtol, Albert B. Ferguson, and Patrick G. Laing; (Baltimore: The Williams and Wilkins Co.), p. 39 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Harth, George H., “Metal Implants for Orthopedic and Dental Surgery”, Metals and Ceramics Information Center, MCIC 74-18, Battelle Columbus Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio, p. 43 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hulbert, S.F., Klawitter, J.J., Leonard, R.B., “Compatibility of Bioceramics with the Physiological Environment”, Ceramics in Severe Environments, ed. W.W. Kriegel and H. Palmour III, Materials Science Research, Vol. 5, Plenum Press, New York (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Semlitsch, M., Lehman, M., Weber, H., “New Prospects for a Prolonged Functional Life-Span of Artificial Hip Joints by Using the Material Combination Polyethylene Aluminum Oxide Ceramic/Metal”, Jr. Biomed. Materials Res., Vol. II, No. 4, pp. 537–552 (July 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Robbins, J.M., Eatherly, W.P., Rossen, D.E., “Fabrication of Graphite for Use as a Skeletal Prosthesis”, 11th Biennial Conference on Carbons, June 4–8, 1973, Gatlinburg, Tenn., Conf. 730601 p. 123; National Technical Information Service, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Springfield, VA. 22151 USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1978 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gray, R.J. (1978). Failure Analyses of Surgical Implants from the Human Body Can Improve Product and Performance Reliability. In: McCall, J.L., French, P.M. (eds) Metallography in Failure Analysis. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2856-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2856-8_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-2858-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-2856-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics