Skip to main content

Representation of Tolerances in Solid Modeling: Issues and Alternative Approaches

  • Chapter
Solid Modeling by Computers

Abstract

The lack of facilities for representing tolerances and related information is a major deficiency of contemporary solid modelers. This paper discusses the semantics of tolerancing for mechanical parts, with particular emphasis on the problems that arise when the features of physical objects cannot be assumed to have perfect form (e.g., when a machined hole is not perfectly cylindrical). Alternative theoretical approaches are proposed, and the representational implications of each approach are explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. “Dimensioning and Tolerancing,” ANSI Standard Y14.5-1973, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, New York, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Bellevaux, J. P. Crestin, “About Geometrical Computations for CAD in Mechanical Engineering,” in Advanced Manufacturing Technology (Proceedings of PROLOMAT’79), P. I. Blake, ed., North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1980, pp. 87–100.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. M. Brown, “PADL-2: A Technical Summary,” IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, Vol. 2, No. 2, March 1982, pp. 69–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. W. J. Fitzgerald, “Using Axial Dimensions to Determine the Proportions of Line Drawings in Computer Graphics,” Computer Aided Design, Vol. 13, No. 6, November 1981, pp. 377–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A. M. Gopin, D. C. Gossard, “Symbolic Dimensioning,” Proceedings of the First Annual Conference on Computer Graphics in CAD/CAM Systems, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, April 9–11, 1979, pp. 268–281.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. C. Hillyard, “Dimensions and Tolerances in Shape Design,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. C. Hillyard, I. C. Braid, “Analysis of Dimensions and Tolerances in Computer- Aided Mechanical Design,” Computer Aided Design, Vol. 10, No. 3, May 1978, pp. 161–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. R. C. Hillyard, I. C. Braid, “Characterizing Non-Ideal Shapes in Terms of Dimensions and Tolerances,” ACM Computer Graphics, Vol. 12, No. 3, (SIGGRAPH ’78 Conference Proceedings. Atlanta, Georgia, August 23–25, 1978 ) pp. 234–238.

    Google Scholar 

  9. V. C. Lin, D. C. Gossard, R. A. Light, “Variational Geometry in Computer Aided Design,” ACM Computer Graphics, Vol. 15, No. 3, (SIGGRAPH/81 Conference Proceedings, Dallas, Texas, August 3–7, 1981 ) pp. 171–177.

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. B. Nadler, Jr., Hyperspaces of Sets, Marcel Dekker, New York, New York, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. A. G. Requicha, “Part and Assembly Description Languages I: Dimensioning and Tolerancing,” Technical Memo No. 19, Production Automation Project, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, May 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. A. G. Requicha, “Mathematical Models of Rigid Solid Objects,” Technical Memo No. 28, Production Automation Project, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, November 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. A. G. Requicha, “Representations for Rigid Solids: Theory, Methods, and Systems,” ACM Computing Surveys, Vol. 12, No. 4, December 1980, pp. 437–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. A. A. G. Requicha, “Representations of Rigid Solid Objects,” Computer Aided Design, J. Encarnação, ed., Lecture Notes in Computer Science No. 89, Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, 1980, pp. 2–78.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. A. G. Requicha, “Toward a Theory of Geometric Tolerancing,” International Journal of Robotics Research, Vol. 2, No. 4, Winter 1983, pp. 45–60.

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. B. Voelcker et al., “The PADL-1.0/2 System for Defining and Displaying Solid Objects,” ACM Computer Graphics, Vol. 12, No. 3 (SIGGRAPH’78 Conference Proceedings, Atlanta, Georgia, August 23-25, 1978) pp. 257–263.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Y. Yemeni, “Some Theoretical Aspects of Position-Location Problems,” Proceedings of the 20th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, San Juan, Puerto Rico, October 29–31, 1979, pp. 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Requicha, A.A.G. (1984). Representation of Tolerances in Solid Modeling: Issues and Alternative Approaches. In: Pickett, M.S., Boyse, J.W. (eds) Solid Modeling by Computers. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2811-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2811-7_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9730-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-2811-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics