Presence Of Nonlinear Excitations in DNA Structure and their Relationship to DNA Premelting and to Drug Intercalation

  • Asok Banerjee
  • Henry M. Sobell

Abstract

We propose that collectively localized nonlinear excitations (solitons) exist in DNA structure. These arise as a consequence of an intrinsic nonlinear ribose inversion instability that results in a modulated β alternation in sugar puckering along the polymer backbone. In their bound state, soliton- antisoliton pairs contain premelted core regions capable of undergoing breathing motions that facilitate drug intercalation. We call such bound state structures β premeltons. The stability of a β premelton is expected to reflect the collective properties of extended DNA regions and to be sensitive to temperature, pH, ionic strength and other thermodynamic factors. Its tendency to localize at specific nucleotide base sequences may serve to initiate site-specific DNA premelting and melting. We suggests that β premeltons provide nucleation centres important for RNA polymerase-promoter recognition. Such nucleation centers could also correspond to nuclease hypersensitive sites.

The possibility that nonlinear excitations (solitons) exist in biopolymers and play a central role I energy transfer was first advanced by Davydov in his classic series of papers (1–3). In addition, a different class of solitons that give rise to localized conformational changes in DNA structure has been proposed by Englander et al. to explain DNA breathing phenomena (4).

Solitons are intrinsic locally coherent excitations that move along a polymer chain with a velocity significantly less than the speed of sound (they may even be stationary). They are combinations of intramolecular and deformational excitations that appear as a consequence of an intrinsic nonlinear instability in the polymer structure.

Extensive research on solitons in many physical systems has shown that this nonlinearity gives the spatially localized conformational excitation a robust character (5,6). Solitons do not significantly interact with conventional normal mode excitations (i.e., phonons). They have their own identity and can be treated by Newtonian dynamics as heavy Brownian-like particles, each having an “effective mass”. Solitary structures — as sites for biochemical activity — behave like chemical thermodynamic. They can arise from equilibrium or nonequilibrium processes.

Here, we propose that localized nonlinear excitations — solitons — exist in DNA. These arise as a consequence of an intrinsic nonlinear instability in DNA structure which is primarily associated with inter conversions between the two predominant sugar-pucker conformations, C2′ endo and C3′ endo. In their bound state, solitons-antisoliton pairs surround β premelted core regions — these regions can undergo breathing motions that facilitate the intercalation of drugs and dyes into DNA. Similar bound state structures could act as phase coundaries that connect different DNA forms.

Several communications describing our ideas have already appeared (7–9). Here, we develop these ideas in greater detail.

Keywords

Sugar Hydration Soliton Adenine Ethidium 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A.S. Davydov, Physica Scripta, 20: 387–394 (1979).MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A.S. Davydov and N.I. Kislukha, Phys. Stat. Sol. 75B: 735–742 (1976).ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A.S. Davydov, Physca 3D 1:1–22, North Holland Publishing Company (1981).ADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S.W. Englander, N.R. Kallenbach, A.J. Heeger, J.A. Krumhansl and S. Litwin, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 77,12: 7222–7226 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A.C. Scott, F.Y.F. Chu and D.W. McLaughlin, Proc. IEEE, 61: 1443–1483 (1973).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Barone, F. Esposito, C.J. Magee and A.C. Scott, Riv. Nuovo Cimento 1: 227–267 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. Alexander, J.A. Krumhansl, in: Structure and Dynamics: Nucleic Acids and Proteins, Adenine Press, Inc., pp. 61–80 (1983).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    H.M. Sobell, E.D. Lozansky and M. Lessen, Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 43: 11–19 (1978).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    H.M. Sobell, T.D. Sakore, S.C. Jain, A. Banerjee, K.K. Bhandary, B.S. Reddy and E.D. Lozansky, Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol., 47: 293–314 (1983).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    In previous communications, we have called this structure the “kink.” However, the word “kink” has a broader meaning in the soliton physics area and, to avoid confusion, we have decided to rename this structure the β element. Its precise definition and full meaning is described in the text.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    H.M. Sobell, B.S. Reddy, K.K. Bhandary, S.C. Jain, T.D. Sakore and T.P. Seshadri, Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol., 42: 87–102 (1977).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    The terms β DNA and β premelted DNA replace β kinked DNA used earlier.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    The dip in the center of the energy density profile signifies the presence of a metastable structural state within the soliton-antisoliton bound state structure. This reflects the relaxation of strain energy in the sugar-puckering within the β premelted core region.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    We use the term β premelton in the most general sense to describe kink-antikink bound states in double-helical DNA and RNA structure. Thus, premeltons can arise in B DNA and A DNA (or A RNA) and can act as phase boundaries transforming B DNA to A DNA during the B to A structural phase transition.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    H.M. Sobell and S.C. Jain, J. Mol. Biol., 68: 21–34 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    G.J. Quigley, A.H.J. Wang, G. Ughetto, G. van der Marel, J.H. van Boom and A. Rich, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 77: 7204–7207 (1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    R.J. Fiel and B.R. Munson, Nucleic Acids Res. 8: 2835–2842 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    V.A. Bloomfield, D.M. Crothers and I. Tinoco, Jr., Physical Chemistry of Nucleic Acids, Harper and Row, Publishers (1974).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    M.B. Fogel, S.E. Trullinger, A.R. Bishop and J.A. Krumhansl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36: 1411–1414 (1976).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    B. Jessee, G. Gargiulo, F. Razvi and A. Worcel, Nucleic Acids Res. 10:19, 5823–5834 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. I.L. Cartwright and S.C.R. Elgin, Nucleic Acids R. 10:19, 5835–5852 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    E. Reich and I.H. Goldberg, in: Progress in Nucleic Acid Research and Molecular Biology, 3: 183–234 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    A.H.J. Wang, G.J. Quigley, F.J. Kolpak, G. van der Marel, J.H. van Boom and A. Rich, Science, 211:9, 171–176 (1981).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Asok Banerjee
    • 1
    • 2
  • Henry M. Sobell
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Radiation Biology and BiophysicsThe University of Rochester School of Medicine and DentistryRochesterUSA
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryThe University of Rochester River Campus StationRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations