Surface Studies with Slow Positron Beaks
Slow-positron physics is an exciting and rapidly advancing field. The continuing progress in the development of intense monochromatic beams of low-energy positrons has made it possible to perform a number of landmark experiments, where the interaction of the positron with solid surfaces plays a central role. These experiments either deal with fundamental atomic physics (positronium spectroscopy) or focus on the electronic and atomic properties of the surface region, using positrons as a probe. In the former category, the surface is involved just as an efficient source of positronium-like atoms. On the other hand, in the second category of experiments the surface i s the main object of study, and has to be prepared and maintained under carefully monitored conditions. The challenge is then to understand the various aspects of the positron-surface interaction and to correlate the observations with microscopic surface information. I shall concentrate on discussing the positron surface physics from a theoretical viewpoint, with emphasis on the new developments and future prospects. For background material and more detailed 1 discussion, the reader is referred to a number of recent reviews1–3.
KeywordsPositron Lifetime Surface Study Energy Loss Rate Slow Positron Incident Positron
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.See the articles by A. P. Mills, Jr., K. G. Lynn, and R. M. Nieminen, in “Positron Solid State Physics”, W. Brandt and A. Dupasquier, eds., North-Holland, Amsterdam (1983).Google Scholar
- 2.A. P. Mills, Jr., in “Positron Annihilation”, P. G. Coleman, S. C. Sharma, and L. M. Diana, eds., North-Holland, Amsterdam (1982).Google Scholar
- 13.R. J. Wilson, in “Positron Annihilation”, P. G. Coleman, S. C. Sharma, and L. M. Diana, eds., North-Holland, Amsterdam (1982)Google Scholar
- 19.S. Valkealahti and R. M. Nieminen, Appl. Phys. (in press), and to be published.Google Scholar
- 25.R. J. Wilson, private communication.Google Scholar
- 27.K. Jester, D. Neilson, and R. M. Nieminen, unpublished.Google Scholar
- 28.A. P. Mills, Jr. and C. A. Murray, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 25, 392 (1980).Google Scholar
- M. Babiker, Physica 103B, 289 (1981)Google Scholar
- 38.A. Vehanen, K. G. Lynn, P. J. Schultz, E. Cartier, H. J. Göntherodt, and D. M. Parkin, to be published.Google Scholar
- 39.P. J. Schultz, K. G. Lynn, W. E. Frieze, and A. Vehanen, to be published.Google Scholar