Ageing of Structural Film Adhesives — Changes in Chemical and Physical Properties and the Effect on Joint Strength

  • C. E. M. Morris
  • P. J. Pearce
  • R. G. Davidson

Abstract

Epoxy-based film adhesives are extensively used in structural aircraft applications but although the one part nature of these materials has many advantages in terms of ease of use, the short shelf-life can be a serious disadvantage, especially when the material spends lengthy times in transit between manufacturer and user. Studies on a number of epoxy and nitrileepoxy adhesives have shown that slow cure, hydrolysis of the resin and specific interactions between components can occur during storage which result in modification of various chemical and physical properties of the uncured adhesives. The relative importance of these reactions depends on the adhesive composition. These modifications are reflected in changes in the strength of joints made with aged adhesives. This paper presents examples of these effects drawn from the results of a number of ageing studies.

Keywords

Hydrolysis Epoxy Rubber Carboxylate Adduct 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. F. Carpenter and T. T. Bartels, SAMPE Quart., 7 (1), 1 (1976).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. A. May, D. K. Hadad and C. E. Browning, Polym. Eng. Sci., 19, 545 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. E. Twichell, J. O. Walker and J. B. Maynard, J. Chromatogr. Sci., 17, 259 (1979).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. L. Hagnauer, Polym. Composites, 1, 81 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. L. Paradis, in “Structural Adhesives and Bonding”, p. 110, Technical Associates Conference, El Segundo, CA, 1979.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. W. Lawless, in “Proc. 24th Natl. SAMPE Symp.”, Vol. 2, p. 979, 1979. Available from SAMPE, Azusa, CA.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. A. Pike, F. P. Lamm and J. P. Pinto, J. Adhesion, 13, 229 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. J. Crabtree, in “Resins for Aerospace”, C. A. May, Editor, p. 459, American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C., 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. A. Pike, F. P. Lamm and J. P. Pinto, J. Adhesion, 12, 143 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. E. M. Morris, A. G. Moritz and R. G. Davidson, in “Adhesion and Adsorption of Polymers”, L.-H. Lee, Editor, Part A, p. 313, Plenum Press, New York, 1980.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. J. Pitt, P. J. Pearce, T. W. Rosewarne, R. G. Davidson, B. C. Ennis and C. E. M. Morris, J. Macromol. Sci., Chem., A17, 227 (1982).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. J. Pearce, R. G. Davidson and C. E. M. Morris, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 27, 4501 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. J. Pearce, R. G. Davidson and C. E. M. Morris, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 28, 283 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. J. Pearce, R. G. Davidson and C. E. M. Morris, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 26, 2363 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    “Adhesives, Heat Resistant, Airframe Structural, Metal-to-Metal”, U. S. Federal Aviation Specification MMM-A-132.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    C. E. M. Morris, P. J. Pearce and R. G. Davidson, J. Adhesion, 15, 1 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. E. M. Morris
    • 1
  • P. J. Pearce
    • 1
  • R. G. Davidson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Defence SupportMaterials Research LaboratoriesAscot ValeAustralia

Personalised recommendations